We recently wrote about a petition which was created by Jonas Stadden’s parents to ask the government to look into the unusual death of their baby son, and we can now share the response from Downing Street with you.
Jonas Stadden, who suffered with Down’s Syndrome until he passed away last year in less than clear circumstances, was separated from his family and sent to live with foster carers as he awaited the outcome of his own adoption proceedings. Arriving perfectly healthy at his new home, he soon became ill and seven months later, he collapsed and died.
The Staddens were never given full and frank information surrounding the death of their son, and so they decided to create a petition asking for a proper inquiry into Jonas’s passing, which they handed to Downing Street last week.
The response does not even come from the Prime Minister himself, rather his comms team, and as you might imagine, the letter indicates that the Staddens’ concerns will need to be dealt with by other departments. We very much hope this petition won’t simply go round and round until it stops being passed on without the proper consideration it deserves.
You can read the letter below:
Many thanks to Maggie Tuttle and Jonas Stadden’s mother for kindly allowing us to print the letter.
Having met Jonas’s mum outside Downing street it is somewhat disheartening to see the standard “not my Job” response, I will say hand on heart the very problem Jonas’s mum will face is the run around simply because there are other issues not relating to Jonas’s family attached, the two matters should have been kept entirely separate from the outset, I was not aware that was the cause until I left parliament that day!
For the Jonas Family to get anywhere in this battle they face they have to keep it to them and them alone for short term.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jerry the family have the top Barrister on the case as they cannot get leagal aid for eather case, so it is all going forward now.
LikeLike
You can expect the usual reply from D of E as well, no children are placed for fostering adoption without a court order, the judge must be satisfied that all other alernatives have been explored and that the decision is made in the best interest of the child blah blah blah.
LikeLiked by 1 person
when Cameron lost a child in death, at the time i wrote to him from all grandparents with our condolences but went on to say that although you have lost a child in death that your child is now in peace, but for the families of children taken into care they will never find peace, and now comes the truth with yet another baby dead in the care system with peace for the family with his mum who carries baby Jonas in her arms 24/7 and she was not aloud to carry Baby Jonas to the door of No 10,
LikeLike
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
Reblogged this on L8in.
LikeLike
Pingback: Downing Street Respond To Baby Jonas Petition | meggiemom342
The petition makes a harrowing read – especially as it sounds so ‘familiar’ to those who critically follow the parallel universe that the child protection and family court system seems to represent.
Manipulative coercion ‘as it would be better for’ seems to be a standard phrase proffered by Social Services and LA layers acting as ‘hired guns’. This is what a compromised Psychiatrist reportedly said after boasting about his ‘friend’ in the Senior Civil Service who apparently had given the instruction to diagnose a mother who tried to report a toddler rape as ‘schizophrenic-schizoid-paranoid’ adding: ‘I know that this is not the right diagnosis but I do as I am told. I am against child snatching but I trust my employer the NHS.’ Reportedly the Psychiatrist added: ‘If this all goes wrong I can go back to my home country. Do not expect me to remember that I ever said this, or that I would remember this in court.’ A compromise complaint submitted some 3 years ago was largely ignored as the advocate raising the issue was not ‘party to the proceedings‘ – and 2 dozen ‘professionals’ paid by tax payers to do a proper job decided to ‘cover up’ the matter.
Police thwarted the rape crime report in the first place accusing the mother of being ‘delusional’ and are showing no signs of acting on the criminal allegations filed recently.
The Legal Aid solicitor ‘recommended’ to the mother to admit to at least some of the ‘neglect’ allegations. The head strong mother resisted this manipulation and the judge quashed all the neglect allegations as false – thus making an appeal application feasible.
However the judge continued to rely on two Court Appointed Experts one of whom tried to smear the advocate by saying ‘Dr X believes in the existence of cults’. Anyone with statutory child protection duties ought to have heard of the Jonestown mass suicide, Waco siege of the Branch Davidians and the Aum sect attacks on the Toyko underground.
The workings of sex cults that blend into UK society are described in the Extreme Abuse Dossier:
https://arsoninformer.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/ead-version-10-09-2013.pdf
The organised crime structures described could well be behind the shenanigans e,g, in the Hollie Greig tragedy:
http://holliegreig.info/
Apparently disabled children are particular ‘popular’ for abuse – as they can even less defend themselves and will be ‘disbelieved’ in the socially constructed systems of UK society. In fact Children with Downs Syndrome are particularly good at remembering facts in a very literal manner and unable to create ‘fantasies’.
When the mother of Hollie first made allegations persecutors attempted to get her sectioned under the mental health act. Psychiatry has a long history of serving the powerful using Deep Sleep, Frontal Lobotomy, Electroshock or forced medication to silence abuse victims and their advocates.
‘Death while in care’ needs proper investigation through National Crime Agency or similar. As child abuse scandals have engulfed the establishment the scene may well have moved towards ‘foster care’ etc. settings where it will be very difficult to find enough victims in a single setting to bring charges – and if so decades too late.
At present local level powers could with ease play the role of ‘game keeper’ and ‘poacher’ simultaneously.
Something along those lines may have happened at Kingston Council which lost control of its Child Protection responsibility following a tragic case where an unwell father let his 2 year old daughter watch porn with him. The mother asked Social Services for help but was ignored – and killed by her husband:
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/london-council-loses-control-of-child-protection-7932131.html
Some months later Kingston Council Leader Derek Osborne quit over his Child Porn arrest:
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-22883414
Osbourne had also accessed 152 extreme images, either in still form or as movies, showing “revolting images of deviant sexual practices”, including depiction of sexual behaviour between humans and animals, and depictions of serious violence being inflicted on women.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/derek-osbourne-former-liberal-democrat-2653210
Social services are quick to act if there is business for the Adoption Industry. Any allegations are nodded through by complicit fellow professionals who prefer to ‘close rank’. On the other hand it is very difficult to get a crime report accepted and a statement issued, and near impossible to get anywhere with challenging a ‘cover up’.
Bad legislation and poor practices are shielding abusers. The legal basis for Forced Adoption has to be revoked to get real change and more safety for children (and their families).
LikeLike
Forced Adoption = Government Legalised Trafficking!
Social workers (involved in Forced Adoption) = Government Legalised Traffickers!
How can it possibly be morally right to give a child to a stranger with the basic checks and have no follow up? What happens to the child post adoption?
How can it be right to Forcibly Adopt a child who will already be traumatised by the loss of his own family?
How can it be right to give a grieving child who has lost its mother/father/extended family to a woman grieving the loss of being unable to give birth to her own child?
Why would anyone want to give a child to someone who has no track record of child care as they have never had a child?
Forced Adoption does not satisfy the child’s needs and will never satisfy the adopting mothers expectations. This is why many children are returned to the care system, when the adoption breaks down.
If this seems a harsh stance to those reading this, these thoughts are expressed by those organisations trying to stop child trafficking.
LikeLike
We all need to join forces in fighting not just abuse but its concealment. I am happy to help in any way I can as this is an epidemic which has been hidden for decades
Milton
LikeLike