As we were doing some research on child welfare topics this week we came across two films we hand’t shared before and which we thought may be of interest.
In the Best Interest of the Child – 1990
This film was released in America and looks at child sexual abuse within a home setting. Many of the themes in this film are still relevant today and highlight established behaviours in the context of child sexual abuse by a family member.
The film also shows how innocent parents try to protect their children when the law lets them down by fleeing with their children. That action is defined in law as kidnapping in both the US and the UK, and so the film asks us to think about whether these legal definitions are always fit for purpose.
Wikipedia’s summary of the film is good, so we’re adding it here:
“Jennifer Colton is a divorced mother and architect who retains custody of her five-year-old daughter Mandy while her ex-husband Walt is granted regular access. However, Jennifer becomes concerned by her daughter’s restless sleeping and increasingly violent behaviours and is horrified to discover it might be related to sexual abuse by the child’s father.
With the help of her attorney-cousin Howard Feldon, next-door neighbour and best friend Nora, as well as various doctors and therapists, Jennifer seeks to protect her daughter from Walt by having his access suspended.
Jennifer soon discovers that the law is not on her side when the court, in the absence of incontrovertible evidence, refuses to restrict Walt’s unsupervised-visitation rights. When Jennifer refuses to let her ex-husband see the child, the judge finds her in contempt and places her in a county jail until she relents.
Ultimately, Jennifer decides the only way to save Mandy from abuse is to “kidnap” the child. She is willing to go to prison so that Mandy can live in hiding with her relatives and away from her abusive father.”
In the Best Interest of the Children- 1992
This film is based on a real life case in Iowa, America and tells the story of a mother who loses her children to the care system. The film attracted significant public attention which led Iowa to implement legislation creating rights for children in foster care.
The case itself stemmed around a mother who suffered with manic-depression while looking after her five children. Her children are eventually taken from her and placed in foster care.
After Iowa amended its legislation to protect the rights of foster children in the state, the children in the case were subsequently placed in the care of their aunt and uncle and were able to visit their mother often, even though she continued to struggle with her mental illness.
Oranges & Sunshine has just been on TV. Catch up on BBC iPlayer.
Social Worker Margaret Humphries uncovered the scandal of the systematic migration of children from the Care system in the 50s, 60s & 70s. Over 130,000 UK children were shipped en mass to Australia. The government spiel of a wonderful new life with a loving family in the sunshine, where you could pick oranges off the trees for breakfast were lies. The children were put in orphanages run by various organisations, like The (Catholic) Brothers & abused. The scandal is not just how it could have happened at all but how was it able to continue for so long! It took over 23 years for the British & Australian governments to apologise.
The current system is not so different. It’s a scandal that 79,000 children are taken into Care in a year. Breaking up families instead of trying to keep them together. Automatic forced adoption of under fives as a first not last resort. Stopping family Contact with children in Care because it suits the foster care/special guardian. The system is just a corrupt. How long will it take for the British Government to stop these practices & apologise to the families? Has nothing been learnt from the mistakes of the past?
LikeLiked by 1 person
” How long will it take for the British Government to stop these practices & apologise to the families?”
The reason why they dont is simple.
to admit the failings would open the floodgates for court action and damages which would run into hundreds of millions if not Billions.
Money usually always comes first.
Due to the rise of greed and selfishness human life today is worth little more than the animals birds and insects that live around us.
LikeLike
Two more very good Films which i believe are based on true stories.
ive seen both and they are very good to watch but emotional too.
Missing Children: A Mother’s Story (1982) USA.
A young mother hands her children into what she thinks is a childcare center while she finds a new home, but returns to find that they have been adopted out without her knowledge.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084336/
Also Philomena.UK.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philomena_(film)
LikeLike
And 30 years later it is still happening with regularity in the Family Courts of America, Australia, Britain. New Zealand, Norway, Ireland etc etc
IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILDREN – FILM 1990.
Jennifer Colton (Meg Tilly) is a divorced mother and architect who retains custody of her five-year-old daughter Mandy (Marta Woodward) while her ex-husband Walt (Michael O’Keefe) is granted regular access. However, Jennifer becomes concerned by her daughter’s restless sleeping and increasingly violent behaviors and is horrified to discover it might be related to sexual abuse by the child’s father. With the help of her attorney-cousin Howard Feldon (Ed Begley Jr.), next-door neighbor and best friend Nora (Michele Greene), as well as various doctors and therapists, Jennifer seeks to protect her daughter from Walt by having his access suspended.
Jennifer soon discovers that the law is not on her side when the court, in the absence of incontrovertible evidence, refuses to restrict Walt’s unsupervised-visitation rights. When Jennifer refuses to let her ex-husband see the child, the judge finds her in contempt and places her in a county jail until she relents. Ultimately, Jennifer decides the only way to save Mandy from abuse is to “kidnap” the child. She is willing to go to prison so that Mandy can live in hiding with her relatives and away from her abusive father.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unfortunately this rings very true.
All too often do protective parents discover sexual abuse by a family member. After the initial shock they are further traumatised when they realise that the law is not on their side. Social Services, Police and Family Court representatives collude with ‘Hired Gun’ Psychs to claim that the protective parent has got a Paranoid/Delusional Personality Disorder – usually without proper evidence to support their claim.
Problem ‘solved’ – or rather ‘brushed under the carpet’.
I pasted below a link to a case where the systemic weaknesses of the Family Court system were seemingly exploited through an orchestrated campaign that included ‘gaslighting’ (making someone appear mentally ill) and serious offending including inadequate Psych assessments:
https://psychassessmentblog.wordpress.com/2019/05/04/epa-psychiatry-congress-2019-in-warsaw-complex-trauma-dissociation-healing/
LikeLiked by 2 people
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-13/family-court-ordering-children-into-unsafe-situations-alrc/11137344?sf214227542=1&fbclid=IwAR0sdFcp3x8L0UJmGqZ1Jv1fLfNbh8v_Cr_pJhgk_nF6Lt8vBvj_2EOuBLQ
LikeLike
Court is miss up
LikeLike