We should be used to disappointment by now as far as the nation’s inquiry into child sexual abuse is concerned, but the latest statements from Home Secretary Theresa May are not encouraging.
In a piece she wrote for The Daily Telegraph, May warns that what we have seen so far is just the tip of a grotesque iceberg which will highlight that, “sexual exploitation runs through every level of British society like a “stick of Blackpool rock.” This all sounds on cue and very much in line with what many of us working in the sector have known for a very long time, but then, the caveats start to creep into May’s rhetoric.
She goes on to say that “the trail” will lead into schools, hospitals, churches and youth clubs as well as “many other institutions that should have been places of safety but instead became the setting for the most appalling abuse”. However, she doesn’t mention Parliament in the list, despite the very many allegations we are seeing now about high profile paedophile rings operating inside Westminster, and the fact that the current terms of reference include Parliament, and its ministers.
And then May tells us that the inquiry will not be probing individuals at all. This she says in connection with questions about the VIP paedophile ring. We can only speculate as to whether she read our piece suggesting that members of the now infamous Paedophile Information Exchange be summoned to give evidence to the Inquiry, but it seems rather uncanny that she should make that point now.
This latest revelation will be an enormous blow to many. It is most likely that members of PIE will be mentioned by certain survivors and that they will have a great deal of information on the movement both during and after its heyday in the 70’s and 80’s. May tells us that any allegations surrounding individuals will be passed on to the police, but their remit is not to work out how the abuse came about, or the wider implications of the cases they will receive.
The Inquiry is missing an incredibly important opportunity, not only to understand the cultural and social origins of child sexual abuse in Britain, but the structure in which it works – and therefore the mechanics of how to stop it. Which, as Theresa May knows, is part of the Inquiry’s remit after all.
UPDATE: The original piece from the Daily Telegraph was published a few hours after we wrote this post – you can read it here.
daveyone1 said:
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
truthaholics said:
Reblogged this on | truthaholics.
LikeLike
padrestevie said:
If Theresa May can assert where the inquiry might lead it does sound like some pre-inquiry investigations have already been carried out.
Why would anyone wish to stop any further inquiries from turning over a few stones in order to expose any lower life forms to the full glare of daylight?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Natasha said:
Hi PS, yes, it seems most odd that she should feel able to make commentsprior to the inquiry getting off the ground, like tip of the iceberg, and the problem runs deeper than you know, etc. not terribly professional when it comes down to it.
LikeLike
patricknelson750 said:
Tories would stop further inquiries because they have had more than their fair share of figures who learned buggery at boarding school and as a result developed tastes that ruined the lives of many young boys.
LikeLike
bob thomas (@bobthom94965788) said:
Agreed. Investigation so far may well embarrass Westminster, I suspect a huge tranche of evidence has been shredded.
LikeLike
Maggie Tuttle said:
Paedophiles are very aware they can walk away or maybe a couple of years in prison or be put on a sex offenders register, it is time for the so called medical experts to learn that a paedophile will always be a sick person, or are the so called experts paedos them selfs, people do not change they can adapt, paedos do not change they are very sick people and need to be locked away for the rest of their lifes, and until the laws are changed to do so then paedos will continue to walk away to continue to rape children, It is not a law changed to bring the paedos to account it is a law changed to bring paedos to account to protect the children screaming to be heard who are not beleived, how can a child be beleived against the Sirs Lords and the well known paedos who are high up in society, and this has been going on for 100s of years, as for the police they have to do as they are told, such as 30 years ago I was told Scotland yard knew of Savile, but could do nothing until he is dead because of the millions he raises for the big charities, so 30 later years how many more childrens lifes have been taken away from them, the police have to do as they are told by the high ups, so what is the point of a police force, I was the founder of prisnoers wives and families society back in the 70s now known as PACT no one knows better than I do of the way the police work, the city police back in the 70s was known as the untouchables and to close a case the police will charge innocent people, so as I was brought up to respect the police in old age not any more. again kids are put into detention centres and my god are they abused sexually and the guards turn a blind eye, same as prisoners they sexually abuse each other it also happens in the womens prisons, so what good are prisons , just another money making industry, and I did the research into PRINDUS the prison industry, Burtons use to have their suites made in prison, woolworths had their garden furniture made in Pentonville prison Gartree Prison in their factory who made screws nuts and bolts boy what a fiddle there, so back in the 70s a prisoner was paid a few pounds a week in the governments own prison industry, whilst at the same time telling the Nation how much it costs to keep a man in prison, with many prisoners doing the repairs on the prisons, so what hope has any child got to be safe, as for Mrs May well the likes of her are off the planet or protecting their wages and high living with debates and debates and the children will always be SCREAMING TO BE HEARD.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sabine Kurjo McNeill said:
The “trail” has indeed lead to Hampstead schools, Natasha… And I told the Home Secretary a month ago: http://tapnewswire.com/2015/02/courts-want-crime-kept-quiet-while-the-innocent-are-punished/
LikeLike
Maggie Tuttle said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2993704/Judge-visibly-distressed-case-paedophile-raped-two-year-old-girl.html
This recent article is exactly what I am saying, this guy raped a 2 year old baby then sentenced to 15 years and with tax payers money will appeal the sentence and it maybe reduced or he will serve a third of the 15 year sentence on good behaviour and let loose to do it again. The rape of children should be for life in prison.
THEN WE HAVE AS IN THIS LINK
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2993067/Made-sleep-barn-eat-vomit-suffer-vicious-beatings-UK-s-sadistic-mother-never-let-jail-three-children-abused.html
again children screaming to be heard with this foster women in the link
who appealed on her prison sentence it was reduced, when people learn to listen to the children instead of CAFCASS telling me all kids in care tell lies then the abuse of kids may stop
When a complaint against a foster carer is reported guess what the child is left for months with the carer whilst the social services investergate, but as with a parent/grandparent a child is taken within a day on allegations only, the amount of parents who have reported to me that when on contact they find their children bruised or other and report this to the social worker then the contact is stopped with the child and nothing more is known such as the foster carer in the link. One grandmother reported her grandchild to be very badly bruised, she never saw the grandchild again for 9 months and this was only after having to go back to court for contact at a great expense then made to signe a contract for contact also stating she must not show any affection to the child, or quesion the child on this that or other, so much again for the children screaming to be heard who are the silent witnesses and here lies the truth, is it any wonder that the family courts are closed, every case of child abuse should be in a crimanal court and then truth can be told. This so called British Empire is rotten to the core and no child has a chance.
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Thank you all for your comments. Just a quick reminder for those of you who may be unclear: whilst we love and welcome thoughts, feedback and the sharing of your work on our site where relevant, we will not tolerate continued attempts at using the blog to simply advertise or gain more exposure for other sites, blogs or personal projects. If we feel the site is being taken advantage of in that way, we will simply not post the comments in question. Many thanks.
LikeLike
Mike Howard said:
It seems a very strange comment to make, how can the enquiry possibly get to the roots of the problem without investigating individuals, whether members of PIE or not?
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Hi Mike, I agree. What is the point of the inquiry being statutory if it won’t use its powers of compulsion? The inquiry will not be forcing victims and survivors to give evidence, so who will these new powers be for? It’s all very odd.
LikeLike
Forced Adoption said:
We are slowly but surely drifting into a communist type regime in the UK;Every time we hear of a government inspired injustice or simple blunder we hear in answer the same dreary refrain. “we cannot comment on individual cases but lessons have been learned”Like tropical parrots all squawk together be they police,social workers ,MPs,Ministers local government ,councillors,or civil servants of any kind at all.
Reports,enquiries,inquests,and requests for information: nearly all meet the same respose “we cannot comment on individual cases”
Where I ask has the common duty of care for the individual gone? Surely we elect people to protect individuals not political institutions or at least we elect representatives to employ others whose duty it is to protect ordinary citizens instead of systems instigated by the very bodies about whom the complaints of unfairness and injustice arise?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maggie Tuttle said:
Another year has nearly gone by with more talks and talks of who should be on the committee and it will go on and on just like they put dear old Sir Munby to tell the Nation change for the family courts is coming , poor old boy, and in this past year with the talks going on how many more kids have been adopted fosterd abused or missing. Apart from John Hemming I would like to see Guy Faulks come back then all the other MPs to include dear old Mrs May would all move their a—-ses and help the children screaming to be heard, ahhaha but not screaming to save the MPs from Mr Guy Faulks.
LikeLike
Mike Howard said:
I have just watched a recording of The Savile programme, I went cold when he said “I think all children should be eaten at birth.” After having spent a lot of time recently trying to make sense of the Hampstead satanic abuse allegations (A and G) and the lack of authoritarian response, I can’t help but think was he “Hiding in plain sight” with this comment?
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Hi Mike, I do think he was blatant and people knew, but by the same token I think society then, and still to a certain extent now, considered child abuse and abusers to be of little consequence. That lack of interest, coupled with a culture that wasn’t really child friendly, perhaps made up part of the problem.
LikeLike
Terri said:
The PIE members and their supporters must be questioned… Harriet Harman!
Keith Vaz and Margaret Hodge should be investigated! IMHO
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dana said:
I rarely disagree with you Natasha but whilst I agree with everything else you have written I make exception to “society …considered child abuse and abusers to be of little consequence.”. I believe everyone knew it was wrong then and everyone knows it wrong now. People, even to stop abuses, rarely do for a multitude of reasons. This allows the perpetrators to get away with it. In Savilles case it was his celebrity and connections to others in power and the fact he made a lot of money, so he was given a lot of latitude. This was a man who used everyone and anything to his own agenda and I have no doubt others higher up in the chain used him, for their own ends and therefore turned a blind eye. Had he been caught red handed they would have dropped him and disowned him! He wasn’t caught but was exposed after his death and now everyone is distancing themselves from him and proclaiming they didn’t know what he was doing! I don’t belelive that for a minute!
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Hi Dana, you know I don’t mind disagreement 🙂 I think I was just trying to say that even as recently as 50 years ago, children were not really given the same respect as adults. They were to be seen and not heard, and most importantly to my mind, to do as they were told without question, always. Robotic instruments without a voice. In some ways I think that lent itself well to avoiding any serous consideration of our little peoples’ rights and their welfare.
LikeLike
Dana said:
Hi Natasha, so true but they still knew right from wrong and chose to disregard it.
What’s sad is that the past lack of media reporting on this issue created an environment that hid the scale of abuses from the general public so if any abuse stories were wriitten about they depicted the horrific type resulting in the death of the victim not the endemic everyday systematic grooming of children that is coming to the fore by professionals now restrictions on the media have been lifted.
What is worrying is many decisions about child protection were (and are still being made) on flawed information. The focus was (is still) on the family. The child was deemed to be at risk if left in their home but the reality was (and still is) the child was (and is) not safe when put into the care of those who could potentially abuse them!
LikeLike
Mike Howard said:
Natasha, that is still happening with children in care today. The Idea that so called Guardians such as CAFCASS are truly representing the wishes and feelings of a child in court is laughable. IRO’s are just Social Workers with a different title, often working in the same buildings as the SW’s, and paid by the same LA’s. The very title IRO is a misnomer, they are not independent and neither are they conducting any sort of review, they have become the “Rubber Stamps” that their appointment was designed to eradicate, leaving children in care without a voice and to quote Maggie T “Screaming to be heard”
LikeLike
Natasha said:
I think that’s a very big problem, made worse by poor training and a sector with low self esteem, which they had before their resources shrunk. I really feel the heart of this is training. Set standards high, select the right people and ensure the culture inside the sector is self checking and open. To start with 🙂
LikeLike
Dana said:
If they can take away children from their homes they can review the situation, based on what is now known and return them! Frankly the myth of the Care System keeping children safe has been blown apart by all the recent news articles that show just how endemic sexual abuse really is. ‘Neglect’ or ‘At risk’ can be worked with and families can be educated and supported to keep their child, just as foster carers/adopters are educated and supported!
LikeLike
A6er said:
Reblogged this on Britain Isn't Eating.
LikeLike
Pingback: UK Column News 27 July 2015 | ukgovernmentwatch