• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • Guide To Making A Subject Access Request
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Monthly Archives: April 2015

Child Abuse Inquiry – Lord Janner May Be Called To Give Evidence

29 Wednesday Apr 2015

Posted by Natasha in child abuse inquiry

≈ 11 Comments

In a very thorough statement published today on the Inquiry’s website, Chair Lowell Goddard has confirmed that she will be investigating the claims against Lord Janner. The decision to do so was made by Goddard and the current panel members.

The investigation will look at the conduct of institutions involved, the factual basis for the allegations both in relation to Lord Janner and the alleged improper attempts by senior public figures to influence the decision making process by these bodies, as well as previous police investigations and prosecutorial decisions.

Survivors and witnesses who wish to make  statements will be able to do so, and interviews with individuals whose conduct may be called into question will also make up part of the investigation.

The statement also suggests that Lord Janner could be interviewed if Goddard considers it appropriate upon reviewing all available medical evidence, and, crucially, commissioning her own expert report should she feel this is necessary.

Whilst this investigation won’t impact on or change The Director of Public Prosecutions’ (DPP) decision not to prosecute Lord Janner, Lord Janner could be prosecuted if the DPP’s decision is successfully overturned by a Judicial Review.

The statement and the Q&A section under it are worth a read. You can catch it all here.

If you’d like to get in touch with the Inquiry about this investigation, you can do so by contacting their Senior Communications Advisor, David Jervis at david.jervis@childsexualabuseinquiry.gsi.gov.uk or on 07771 982 759

Inquiry image-page0001

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Nesting Instinct – Are Fathers Really Powerless During Pregnancy?

29 Wednesday Apr 2015

Posted by Natasha in child welfare

≈ 1 Comment

This was the thought that occurred to us whilst we read an interesting article published in one of our favourite father-focused magazines, Fathers Quaterly.

The piece talks about how fathers often feel powerless during their partner’s pregnancy and that in order to understand their partner’s experience better and to bond with their baby, fathers should engage in the nesting instinct.

It’s a really touching post, which looks to engage fathers in the Nesting phase of pregnancy, where women typically feel the need to clean, rearrange and prepare the home for the arrival of their little one. The central theme is enabling mum, and allowing her to Nest without doing the heavy lifting, fixing and building that is sometimes a part of this phenomenon. Enter dad with his screwdrivers, flat pack cot and electronic baby monitors…

This is a lovely idea, and a great way for both parents to get into the spirit of mummy and daddyhood, but it misses the point a little.

Fathers are not powerless during pregnancy, and power tools alone are not going to empower them. It’s a myth that women are in complete control whilst going through the many different phases of pregnancy. Despite playing host to the miracle inside their bodies, women have no control over their child’s development. It can feel incredibly frightening at times, not knowing whether your baby is alright in your womb, or suffering in silence as something goes terribly wrong on your watch. Just as alienating is the constant anxiety that you might have eaten or drunk something taboo which could impact on your baby’s development at any time. And those fears can leave women feeling just as powerless as men.

But the truth is, for all the reasons we have to feel powerless, there are many more that allow mothers and fathers to empower themselves during pregnancy and to develop a bond with their unborn baby that will last forever. Yes, getting in touch with the Nesting instinct, is one, but there are many others.

Talk to the foetus. That might sound strange, but it’s been scientifically proven to benefit babies. And the more you talk to the tummy the more familiar your unborn baby becomes with the sound of your voice, so that when they eventually enter the outside world, they will be able to recognise you by the sounds you make. It also helps to develop their language skills, so dads, if you speak another language, why not introduce your baby to it?

It’s all about the music. Research aside, and there’s plenty of it extolling the virtues of letting your baby listen to music in the womb, fathers can get involved by making music compilations and playing them to their babies whilst still in the womb. Besides the basic nurturing skills involved in picking music for your child and being aware of their development, it’s also a lovely way for dads to share their musical taste with their children (before they’re old enough to shake their heads and tell you you’re not cool :)).

Talk about the future. Talking with your partner about all the fantastic things you want to do with your child once they’re out of the womb is a great way to develop empathy skills further and start to explore the world of parenting. Talk for long enough, and your fatherly instincts will kick in so that parenting feels natural and a part of who you are.

And the beauty of these rituals? They are as equally applicable to mums as they are to dads. In a world where fathers are often made to feel like they don’t have a role to play during pregnancy, the opposite is in fact true. The more dads engage during pregnancy, the easier it will be for both dad and baby to develop that special bond that only fathers can have with their children. The only thing you guys can’t do is carry the baby in your womb, but that just means mums develop their own special bond, too.

Parenting is about sharing the experience, and bonding plays an important part. How you choose to share the experience is up to each parent, but there is no doubt that babies benefit from more love and attention, rather than less.

So go for it dads, and don’t ever let anyone tell you you’re powerless during pregnancy – it’s all about perception.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Spain Moves To Raise Minimum Marriage Age To 16 – But Are Its Reasons For Doing So Flawed?

28 Tuesday Apr 2015

Posted by Natasha in child welfare

≈ 4 Comments

Lawmakers in spain are almost finished drafting legislation that would raise the minimum marriage age from 14 to 16 there, but whilst the intention behind the shift is good, very little evidence on the ground seems to support the move.

Should that matter if there is an overarching philosophy to protect potential victims of child marriage or is it just lip service in a world where Spain’s most vulnerable children are not likely to register their marriages with the state and so remain largely invisible, and ultimately immune to legislative protections like this one?

That tension is at the heart of the debate, which wil be aired in full in the Spanish senate next week as the House discusses the proposals.  Whilst the marrying age in Spain is 18, there are exceptions which allow 14-16 year olds to marry. Any 16-year-old wanting to marry can do so with parental permission, while 14-year-olds are allowed to marry, but they require permission from a judge to do so.

Under the new law proposed, 14 and 15-year-olds would no longer be able to marry, while 16-year-olds would require permission from a judge or parental consent to tie the knot.

Charities within Spain are quick to defend the move, citing forced marriages and a gender imbalance which sees girls married off at a much younger age than the boys marrying them, as reasons to change the law. However, the number of children recorded as being involved in such marriages is small and it is not clear whether these unions happened under duress, or not.

Advocates of child marriage would argue that the new legislation encroaches on the teenager’s right to make a choice, however child welfare activists take an opposing view. They suggest that raising the age of marriage in this way would allow children a greater say in a decision which not only potentially impacts upon their health, but also their education and overall quality of life.

Child welfare activists, who have been lobbying for a change in the law, may be trying to stem child marriages which are not yet on their radar. They cite religious communities and other minority demographics as possible sources for child marriage, though very little is known about the children who find themselves engaging in the practice.

And whilst the number of child marriages in Spain appears to be increasing, any notion that the new legislation might reduce the practice is likely to be unfounded. If child marriages are taking place within small, elusive and often hidden communities, laws like these will have little impact on the phenomenon. Often carried out without state registration, using only customary rituals and practices, child marriages are notoriously hard to detect – and legislation alone will not be able to stop it.

If countries like Spain wish to reduce forced marriages involving children, they must reach out to those communities taking part in the practice and start to engage with them. Only then will they be able to make a difference.

So what do you think? Does raising the marrying age protect children or should we look to ways of ascertaining which marriages are sound and which are based in duress?

Spain

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Digital Single Market – Strange Name, Interesting Idea

28 Tuesday Apr 2015

Posted by Natasha in child welfare

≈ 1 Comment

The Digital Single Market is a new project which aims to unify EU countries online and ensure individuals in every member state have equal access to resources and commercial opportunities. The idea, as stated on their website, is to improve people’s lives and provide a simple and accessible way to connect, and converse. The goal, in reality, is to  promote the free flow of online services and entertainment across national borders.

Although we’re not mad on the name (it feels cold and too corporate), the idea is an interesting one. Next month, the EU will officially set out its proposal for a strategy to make the Digital Single Market a useful and efficient way to access information and connect with people (although the report has already, unofficially, been leaked), but the DSM site as it is, is still very much in beta phase – some links don’t work and it looks messy.

The website is also multilingual. Currently, the text is in French, German and English. The site also looks like it wants to be a crowdsourcing effort, with Ideas, Evidence and Video pages all allowing members (you have to register to use the site), the ability to upload and share data. There’s even a page for polls asking things like, “Should there be a multilingual news source to enhance the exchange between countries without constant English-filter?” Touché.

The site also wants to encourage general debate. And that’s where child welfare comes in (and how we found the site). One conversation thread, which appears to have been started by someone working for the European Child Safety Online NGO Network (ENACSO) is entitled, “Removal and blocking of child abuse images (‘child pornography’)” It’s just a small piece that makes no controversial or questioning remarks, but it clearly hopes to incite conversation.

Whether this site will take off is yet to be seen, but it is a noteworthy development within the digital revolution and an interesting platform for its implicit political agenda and its part too, to play in the work revolution.

DSM

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Question It!

27 Monday Apr 2015

Posted by Natasha in Question It

≈ 32 Comments

Welcome to a sunny start to the week.

As election time draws near, we thought we would focus on what you would like from the relevant parties when it comes to child welfare. So, our question to you this week is this: what policies or proposals would you like to see the parties hoping to be elected, offer when it comes to children and family?

face_question_mark

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

In The News

23 Thursday Apr 2015

Posted by Natasha in News

≈ 2 Comments

Some headlines from today’s news outlets:

  • Baltic States Say Norway, UK and Finland Have Stolen Their Children
  • National Crime Agency lists police failings over Rotherham sex abuse
  • Retired Bishop sorry for sexual abuse of children at Queensland orphanage (Australia)

news12

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Buzz

21 Tuesday Apr 2015

Posted by Natasha in The Buzz

≈ 5 Comments

The latest:

  • Transgender father loses court battle over children’s birth certificates – rights of the child versus rights of the parent, but the law must be updated to be able to offer a better solution
  • Sex offending may be in the genes but knowing that won’t prevent it – nature versus nurture, but still, bias must be left at the door for best practice in the relevant sectors
  • Fostering before the age of two helps children in institutional care deal better with stress – part controversial, part common sense, except when you factor in the number of foster placements that break down in the UK….

Buzz

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Question It!

20 Monday Apr 2015

Posted by Natasha in Question It

≈ 12 Comments

Welcome to another week.

In an unusual decision by social services, a husband and child abuser who has been convicted of attacking a 13-year-old girl has been allowed to reside in the home of his partner and two daughters, both under the age of 13.

The local authority has allowed this measure on the condition that the children are locked in their bedroom at night, have a baby monitor on in their room so they can call their mother should they need to use the bathroom, and the partner himself must sleep on the far side of the mother’s bed so she can sense if he tries to get up in the middle of the night to go into the girls’ bedroom. The man in question is not the girls’ biological father. He is considered to be an ongoing risk to the children.

Our question to you then, is this: do you think this plan is in the best interests of the children, and do you think it would make a difference if the man in this case was their biological father?

face_question_mark

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Buzz

17 Friday Apr 2015

Posted by Natasha in The Buzz

≈ 7 Comments

The latest news items:

  • Parents with a disability are treated almost like criminals, a parliamentary committee conducting a hearing has heard
  • Former Catholic bishop tells inquiry he failed to adequately protect children
  • Three chances to prosecute Labour peer Lord Janner for child abuse were missed

Buzz

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Parliament Square Demo on Child Sexual Abuse – Statements From Attendees

16 Thursday Apr 2015

Posted by Natasha in child abuse inquiry

≈ 8 Comments

Campaigners for a fair and just child abuse inquiry gathered in Parliament Square last weekend (11th April), to highlight those issues which remain at the core of past and present abuse.

Speaking on behalf of those who had suffered abuse, politicians, victims, survivors and whistleblowers all shared their thoughts on the current investigation into child sexual abuse. Those who could not attend the meeting, added their thoughts so that they could be shared on the day.

One campaigner has very kindly provided us with statements that were prepared for the demonstration, and so we add them below:

Zac Goldsmith

‘I have no doubt that grotesque things have happened at Elm Guesthouse and other places around the country at the hands of depraved and powerful people, and that those things were systematically covered up. The evidence is overwhelming, and it is a national disgrace that it has taken so long for Governments to act.

But I am pleased that thanks to extraordinary campaigning by some journalists and many, many survivors, the Home Secretary has heard those arguments, and that she set in place an all encompassing inquiry. The very fact that the Inquiry is happening has already stimulated far great action by police. I hope the process is sufficiently advanced that whatever happens at the election, we will get to the bottom of these monstrous events. But it is for all of us to remain vigilant and ensure the inquiry is never blown off course. Victims need to be heard, and criminals need to face the law.

I want to congratulate and thank all those – both inside and outside of Parliament – who helped pressure the Government to take action. For many, the wait has been a lifetime, but it is drawing to a close.’

Simon Danczuk

“Child abuse is one of this country’s most shameful secrets and I’m pleased to see it’s now being dragged out of the shadows and people are slowly waking up to the fact that we’ve turned a blind eye to a massive scandal for far too long.

“I’m sorry I can’t be with you today. I’m currently campaigning to stay in Parliament where I hope to carry on fighting to secure justice and better support for survivors of child sexual abuse.

“I know we’re now in a General Election period and I share your frustration that Parliament is making slow progress in its inquiry into decades of child abuse that’s been covered up by the establishment. But your voices will not be silenced, your determination to get to the truth will not be stopped and I’m confident that the powers that be will not be able to put this genie back in the bottle. The truth must and will be told.”

John Mann

“I support any and all efforts to expose how grievously survivors of child abuse continue to be failed in this country.

Only with effective campaigning and the organisation of survivors’ groups has it become possible that perpetrators at all levels of society can be brought to justice, and for survivors to receive justice.

That is a crucial point. The cover-ups of so-called VIP abusers are very important, but we must always remember that children have been abused in every part of the country and at every level of society.

Some of the people who have come to me in Nottinghamshire have told me of their horrific experiences of abuse and how they have been failed by the very agencies that should have been there to support them. There are hundreds of cases in Nottinghamshire alone that need prosecuting, and resources need to be put in place to go much further than that. A national institute for survivors of abuse would bring those agencies that are currently failing survivors together and provide the support that they really deserve. Concerted pressure on all MPs after the election can make this happen.

The campaign must be non-partisan and we will find that we have unlikely allies. A few decent Liberal Democrat and Conservative MPs voted for my measure to lift the threat of prosecution under the Official Secrets Act in cases of child abuse. If I am re-elected I will re-submit my proposal to change the law and allow special branch officers, the police and others to come forward with evidence without fear of being prosecuted under the official secrets act.

The outstanding efforts of campaigners have forced the issue of child abuse up the political agenda. If that continues, alongside the national inquiry, we can achieve for survivors the justice that many of them should have received years ago, and build systems that will create a better world for the survivors of the future.”

Phil Frampton, Barnardo’s Survivor, Whiteflowers Group

“It is important that child abuse survivors stand up and show that they are not prepared to be marginalised by the government’s child abuse inquiry, which is descending into a YES MINISTER Farce.

Justice Goddard has declared that abuse survivors lack objectivity and therefore cannot be on the Inquiry Panel. Instead, she declares that some of them can sit on a consultation panel. But this consultative panel is by definition tarred with the same brush as lacking objectivity.

The Ban on survivors being on the Panel is a direct slur on those of us that have disclosed and the attack on our objectivity is the same as that which stops over 10 million people disclosing in this country for fear of stigmatisation. The Home Office actions will not encourage people to disclose and therefore leave paedophiles at large and children at serious risk.

The Home Office are squirming. They refused to confirm that all members of the Panel were checked as to whether they were survivors of child sex abuse or not. The ban is just an excuse to bar survivors.

Meanwhile on the Panel is Druscilla Sharpling who is employed by the Home Office and Alexis Jay who was a senior social work manager – so how independent will they be? They have a clear conflict of interest and such people will not shine a torch into the dark corners for fear they will see themselves and their friends.

Only major protest by the survivors plus public outrage has stopped this Inquiry from being a complete farce. So we continue our fight. Meanwhile we must not forget that this Inquiry was supposed to deal with the establishment.

You start sweeping the stairs from the top.

I believe that we now need a separate urgent inquiry, which should report in 12 to 18 months time on the child abuse and cover ups which involved members of the Houses of Parliament and senior government officials. Venceremos”

Peter McKelvie, Child protection officer and Islington whistleblower

” I have little doubt that a relatively small but significant number of MP’s and Lords have sexually abused vulnerable children over at least the last 50 years.

Present information implies that the number could be between 20 and 30 but the allegations need to be thoroughly investigated and final figures could be higher

I have no doubt in my mind that politicians from all 3 main political parties are amongst the most powerful names that have been passed to various Police forces In the last couple of years

I have also no doubt in my mind that the hierarchies of all 3 main political parties would have known of any allegation against someone in their own party and that there has been a history of collusion and cover up right across the board amongst individuals and agencies that should have exposed such criminal behaviour and put child protection before any other consideration ”

Kaz Tiggr, Survivor

” The one thing survivors were promised in 2012 was support. That support has not been forthcoming.

There are tales of key witnesses being left to make their own way to Sentencing. A key factor in the journey toward acceptance of events and a certain level of Closure.
People, two years after being promised counselling, are still waiting for it to start or are being told to fund it themselves.

The police are very unapproachable, for the most part. Unwilling to push the boundaries of their remit or explore the truth of what they are supposed to investigate.
When asked if she had read the Waterhouse Report, one DC sent out to survivors homes under

Operation Pallial said; “Of course not, have you Seen the Size of it?”
The survivor replied “Yes, I’ve read it several times.”.

One thing that nobody seems to be taking into account the effect this has on survivor’s families. Loved ones are left to pick up the pieces each time a dark anniversary comes around, or a chance remark triggers a memory, or the Police phone to say the CPS are going to write to say, “Sorry, not enough evidence to prosecute.” or worse “Sorry, time limitation…”.

There is no help for those that see the daily self-destruction and can do nothing to stop it.”

A very big thank you to Terri Thatcher for sharing these statements and photos with us.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,496 other subscribers

Contact Researching Reform

For Litigants in Person

April 2015
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar   May »

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 812 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: