The latest news items:
- I may quiz Janner myself, says head of abuse inquiry: New experts to decide on his dementia
- Lord Janner was still director of his firm THREE WEEKS ago, it emerges as damning dossier alleges police chief allowed peer to molest young boys
- Election 2015: Labour pledges a radical overhaul of child protection if it wins power – but are their proposals any good?
Maggie Tuttle said:
Let us remember Cameron and Cleg promised grandparents rights so what has labour done jumped on the band waggon for votes to say yea we will overhaul the child protection will they hell.
LikeLike
daveyone1 said:
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
Forced Adoption said:
I can only repeat and repeat my unheeded cry “no punishment without crime” ! To those who say “we are not talking about crime here;we are talking about best interests of the children so nobody is punished” I say “Tell that to mothers whose children have been taken for risk of emotional abuse and been adopted by strangers”
Those mothers have (as Sir James Munby said) been punished in the worst possible way since the abolition of the death penalty !
Children should never be taken from parents who have committed no crime against their children .If parents are charged with a crime children should be taken into temporary fostercareand given back to those parents who are acquitted or when charges are dropped unlike now when family courts take no notice of acquittals by criminal appeal courts and keep the children of parents declared not guilty !
What use are laws if parents are punished when they do not break them??
LikeLike
Dana said:
Hi Forced Adoption, I have just been on your website and watched the
BBC video about parents fleeing the UK with their children. The UK social workers believe that fleeing puts the child at risk. Is there any evidence that supports that belief? I remember the Irish social workers were aghast at how the British social workers operated.
LikeLike
ladyportia27 said:
This is how society is fooled, until their family experience how the system actually works.
“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.”
― Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
There is also a clear war on Motherhood as laid out by Dr Phyllis Chesler
Her work mirrors it and she explains it all so clearly, especially the myths created by the media etc.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/08/05/read-excerpt-from-phyllis-cheslers-book-mothers-on-trial/
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Polite notice to our posters. This is not a forum for pushing personal Party preferences prior to the elections. Any comments trying to do so will not be published. Many thanks.
LikeLike
Dana said:
Election 2015
Hi Natasha, Did you block my last comment? In replying to “Labour saying they will pledge child protection reforms IF they get in after the election” my reply was factual and not said to necessarily promote my own political preference although I do support UKIP. I know you don’t and I respect your choice, each to their own. The next few days will bring forth all kinds of promises by all the parties but as I mentioned UKIP is the only one who has actually put child reforms in their manifesto (which is relevant to this forum) and I think Labour is jumping on the bandwagon! I’ve sent you the 90 second manifestos of all parties except Lib Dems as I couldn’t find it on utube!
LikeLike
Natasha said:
hi Dana, I read your comment as a call to vote for UKIP, which is fine, but this website is not for pushing political agendas. You can do that on your own site or sites which are focused on party politics, but not on Researching Reform. Many thanks.
LikeLike
Dana said:
No Natasha, my comment was not to push any agenda. That was not my intention. I sent the 90 second segments of all main parties plus other vids to you as I thought you might like to put them on your twitter feed as they may be of interest to your followers. My intention was simply to respond to your question. I thought it was relavant and showed a comparison. If it had been any other party I would have commented on them in the same way. With the elections coming up it’s hard to differentiate personal opinion from what appears to be a personal agenda. I don’t think my choice is going to convert anyone or you would have succumbed!☺. However I’ll zip it! 😯
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Hi Dana, I only saw UKIP videos. In any event, this is not about converting people. My point is that this site is about child welfare. I’ll say no more on the matter now.
LikeLike
Maggie Tuttle said:
Morning Natasha, i take on board what you say regarding pushing elections, I never do because i have never had faith in Governments i have never nor would vote for people who only vote for them selfs for money, Labour are saying IF we win the elections we will overhaul the child care Cameron said IF we win the elections grandparents will get rights, there is only one honest person in the house of commons and that is John Hemming, at least he cares for children and would not continually use the word IF.
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Morning Maggie, I know, the comment was not in relation to anything you posted, not to worry. I’m happy for people to mention party politics on this site if they wish to discuss it, which is what I did on my post, but not to push their personal preferences onto others, which I make a point of not doing myself.
LikeLike