In a terrible turn of events, it has emerged that Prime Minister David Cameron and his deputy, Nick Clegg have been trying to block significant materials outlining child abuse at government level.
New reports confirm that documents prepared by the Establishment, highlight the extent to which the government knew about the late paedophile and MP Cyril Smith’s crimes against children. Despite a Freedom Of Information request made by the Daily Mail asking for the release of the 19 page dossier, the government dragged its feet on the matter and refused to release the document. The newspaper complained to the Information Commissioner’s Office, which ruled that the Cabinet Office had broken the law by failing to respond to the original request.
The Cabinet Office, faced with the threat of High Court action, submitted and released the document to the paper.
Even more concerning still is the Cabinet’s continued insistence on hiding information relating to child abuse within government, which is clearly of public interest. Four new historic files have come to light, however the Cabinet Office has refused to share even the names of these files, which has left survivors and victims’ families feeling disgusted by the government’s clandestine behaviour.
The Prime Minister should tread carefully. Having called out social work professionals for failing to report child abuse, and currently threatening them with a five year prison sentence if they fail to do so, he is likely to find himself being thrust under the legislative train by the media and members of the public with longer memories it would seem, than his own. Having also told the nation to its face that a VIP paedophile ring was nothing short of a conspiracy theory, he may have to eat his words, and a great deal of humble pie, if the four files he is currently refusing to reveal happen to document widescale abuse, or the suggestion of it, within government circles.
The Statutory Inquiry Into Child Abuse must make this area of their investigation a priority. It may well be the source of the trouble. This week we wrote an article on what the Inquiry may wish to do in order to build trust amongst survivors and members of the public. We would include the need to carry out a full investigation into central government’s part to play in covering up child abuse, facilitating it and engaging in this terrible crime.
That investigation must be carried out swiftly and with full and unfettered access to all relevant documentation. Mrs Goddard must have the stomach for this imperative. And she should start by demanding the immediate release of the four new files.
daveyone1 said:
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
MealtimeStrategy said:
It’s shocking that they can’t see that this is where the covering up has to stop.
They really do appear to still believe they can “get away with it” by lying, concealing and delaying. It’s hugely disappointing…
In any other job, concealing ANY kind of information from one’s employers, let alone documents about the criminal acts of another employee, would be gross misconduct and a sacking offence.
If Cameron and Clegg can’t see that this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity we are giving them to clear the decks, open the files, make things right is a lifeline to their careers, their political legacies and the very integrity of the system they peddle, they are either incompetent beyond comprehension or doggedly determined for the truth to remain concealed.
Both possibilities are genuinely terrifying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maggie Tuttle said:
I will repeat yet again what a Cafcass officer of 30 years told me that
ALL CHILDREN IN CARE TELL LIES AND NONE KNOW WHAT THEY WANT.
Untill the social services are brought to account along with the stopping of the multibillion pound childrens industry which creates millions of jobs with the prison sentencing of the paedophiles changed, if you are found guilty for lesser offences such as benifit charges where people can be sentenced to more years in prison then a paedophile then no child in the UK will be safe, the corruption is at such a high level but then this is dear old Great Britain and the heads of state for hundreds of years have ruled most of the world as well as the UK so does any one really think that the child abuse by Governments is really going to change, NO, as for the kids from care who have been abused and tried to report the abuse with no support from the police again another dead end, I have watched governments for more then 40 years and they will dabate make a new law but nothing will change it is just all talk so the nation thinks truth is on the way, but it is a cover up to shut up the nation, Sir Munby what has really changed nice old boy but its talk and talk, not his fault he has to do as he is told to do and kids continue to suffer, there is no way any one can report a kid in care being abused if they do or did the contact is stopped and another kid left alone in fear, there are no doors to open for the abuse of kids in care or for the families wrongly accussed and the paedophiles continue to walk away apart from the odd ones or when the likes of Cyril Smith and Savil and others are dead, so let the nation continue to beleive Cameron and the likes are now bringing change,
Lets go to the courts and no one knows better than I as my info comes from families throughout this country, Judges are making orders such as in a recent case two judges agreed with the child for contact and then passed the BUCK back to social services with stating I do hope the social services will consider the childs feelings, so why are judges not making the orders for the contacts, the whole system is so corrupt judges are getting paid untold money with expences “In a child’s best interest” with contacts for family and kids stopped over night by a social worker with thousands of familes not knowing what to do as the social workers are a law unto them selfs and rule this so called Great Britain that traffics kids like there is no tomorrow. NO KID IN THE UK IS SAFE.
LikeLike
fstoptwo said:
I would just like to say a few words on this if I may?
I was abused by my family when I was young. I put myself into care because of the physical abuse. The staff in the childrens home were the best I could ever hope for. The key worker I had was the sweetest man and he treated me like his grandson. Giving me the best advice any man could hope to gain? He was tremendous. I worked in top secret government facilities and then joined the Army where I became a well rounded person with high expectations of myself. I may well be lucky coming through the system like I did? But I can swear , that at no point in my child care did anyone do me any harm . They were all fantastic.
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Hi Fstoptwo, thank you for your comment. There are wonderful people in the sector doing wonderful, caring things, and we are so glad that you have had the benefit of those kinds of people in your life. It’s a lovely thing to know. Unfortunately, many of the people who come to this blog have had bad experiences, and they are a significant group, but it is always heartening to hear that others have had good experiences.
LikeLike
Maggie Tuttle said:
Teen wins right to speak in court care proceedings
Posted: 06 Mar 2015 05:57 AM PST by Mariilyn Stowe Blog
A 14 year-old girl has won the right to speak on her own behalf in care proceedings relating to herself and her younger sister.
and according to the article the child has not reported that her father sexually abused her, but no one can get passed the social workers with their written lies as I said in my previous blog some kids are speaking to the judges in the courts but the judges pass all back to the social services with many kids sent back to the care system to be abused with no contacts with the family.
LikeLike
Dana said:
It clear why they don’t want to release the files, it’s contents are damming to the parties. With a general election coming up in May they don’t want to display their own dirty laundry! Governments have been brought down for less!
Cameron and Clegg sounds like a comedy act but there is nothing funny about what they are doing. Deliberately withholding the names of possible abusers from the public will thwart investigations into the historic child abuse perpetrated within Parliamentary walls, as it is known that other victims come forward after allegations has been made, reassured that they may be finally believed now. This may also draw out more recent victims. What is funny is that Cameron & Clegg both profess to be family men!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Forced Adoption said:
Only Paedophiles have the motivation to suppress information about sexual abuse of children
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Or sociopathic politicians who are more concerned that the evidence might hurt their party’s chances of re election. Conservatives historically, have attracted the cruel. I wouldn’t be surprised if many sex offenders in Westminster have conservative leanings.
LikeLike
bill funter said:
any politicians who are their puppets , spineless or believe in ‘ the greater good ‘ which basically means ‘ cover up no matter how bad it is and keep a stiff upper live and as long as its not your kids being raped its fine ‘ .Thats the worse part , the people in power now ? clegg / cameron etc > they know !!!!!!!!!!!!and they cover it up , what does that say about them ? and yet they will be voted in by grandmothers with grand childen ? the uk has really lost it for now , the next 2 generation will destroy the tories though when its our time , in a few years the tories and labour will be finished
LikeLike
Pingback: Paedophiles are running the country – as per usual |
Pingback: Paedophiles are running the country – as per usual | Alternative News Network
ladyportia27 said:
Not looking good, is it?
No change after all these years.
How can the public have any trust now in those paid to protect children from abuse?
Its all about keeping up the illusion that all is well when it is not.
The entire can of worms will be opened in the end anyway and hiding the truth now is going to make these people look a million times worse in a few months.
Why not release the files as citizens have a right to know.
Is it going to be another Dunblane perhaps?
LikeLike
ladyportia27 said:
Nothing new Natasha.
I remind myself here of actually reporting the truth re sexual abuse of children in care in recent years.A criminologist asked that we inform the ministers .
Both remained silent and did not ask for the files, which would have proved everything related to them .
So was it to protect social workers, GAL and other legal reps involved?
Its not looking good for all those involved and for those who have turned a blind eye.
These are fairly recent cases within the last 8 years clearly showing little change in exposing the child rapists and their agents.
LikeLike
Forced Adoption said:
Official Government advice to paedophiles:- “If you fancy abusing a child get a job as a social worker or care assistant in a “special school”If you want a particular child just see that it gets taken into care and that poor kid will be at your mercy.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
ringwind said:
FBI polygraphers know that undetectable deception is impossible when using a Stoelting Ultrascribe polygraph. Google “The FBI uses polygraphs to eliminate suspects”
LikeLike
Maggie Tuttle said:
Has any one really looked into the deaths (or cover ups) of child abusers start with to Savil dead, Lord McAlpine accussed walked free left the country then dead then we have Lion Brittan accussed and dead and the rest of the government paedos who supposidly are dead, Myra Hindley dead, NO, she could not have parole as there would have been an out cry because of childrens bodies still unknown on the Moors and who was her good friend Lord Longford so time will go by with dabates and promises for the nation and the paedos in governments will have the time to hide all and no one can be bought to account they are all dead or register them selfs as citizens such as in Barbados or the likes, I know Scotland yard knew of Savil and ??? 30 odd years ago and was told nothing will happen to them until they are both dead because of the millions they raise for the big charities, so you see money again “In a child’s best interest”
LikeLike
bill funter said:
its about maintaining strong governance , thats why fathers like David Cameron are covering up for known Paedophiles they Protect even now , if they release the truth it will destroy the entire system and monarchy as they are ALL BENT and corrupt , ALL LIARS.ALL OF THEM.the only party anywhere near true aree the greens but house prices win votes , not policies for the young.
Cameron and all the fathers and mothers in power who Lie on behalf of Paedophiles ? they sold their soul forever……..big karma to come for them , i think personally these sex scandals will destroy british politics within 3 years.When it comes out that cameron and others are NOW covering up for sex offenders its going to create a shitstorm that destroys the tories at the very least.I really hope it does.Itsa fake rigged casino british politics , democracy is a LIE , its whip corrupted fixed casion in breed establishment games , NOTHING MORE.Keep it real
LikeLiked by 1 person
bill funter said:
the process i think is a deliberate slowing down and release of info , as people die they will be exposed on purpose , so it looks far less worse , i have zero doubt most members of the house of commons etc know who are the Paedophiles.Some of this relates to members who like rent boys from care homes , thats for some reason regarded as a lesser crime , half thatchers party was into that at one time , its a public schoolboy thing , you get buggered an you bugger and they see it as normal or a little ‘ quirk ‘ and they sweep it aside as ‘ just homosexuality ‘ ( remember when cameron was confronted on day time tv ? – he said he didnt want a gay witchunt ‘ .)The disturbing truth is these people in power like Cameron and Clegg who are fathers ? they cover up for Paedophiles , no matter what the excuse that is the work of someone no better than a Paedophile.Look at thatcher , she knew who was one ? she then employed them ? she dined with them ? ( look at Saville who everyone k knew was a Paedophile and worse ) and she is suppose to be some saint ?she was a scumbag selfish user who protected Paedophiles for her own career and for some fake queen and fake country ideology and pure blood nazi ethic..
LikeLike
davef said:
I agree with everything that`s being said, when oh! when will the people of this country wake up to the fact that our so called leaders are just out for themselves,and to hell with the rest of us,anything that could be a slur on them is always covered up. I would like to see the case of Dr David Kelly resurrected,he obviously knew too much, so what happened too him, I`ll say no more.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Margaret Mills said:
has HE got the right to STOP this info being released – if he has who gave hm that POWER ?
LikeLike
rainbowsspirit said:
Seriously though. Why would a accused pedophile hand over information, on thereself. Local authorities refuse to give me all my mine or my dead brother’s . As Cameron says. Were all in it together. As for the victims were all in the stitch up together. So keep going, stay safe and use there law’s to shaft them as they continue to do to us
LikeLike
Pingback: 2015 In Review: Controversial Posts, Top Commenters And Global Mischief | Researching Reform