Whatever The Timpsons and Loughtons of this world have to say about progress for children in care, the reality is that not much has changed since light was first shed onto the dire conditions most children experiencing social care face, almost a decade ago now.
Jackie Long is social affairs editor over at Channel 4, and her recent blog on outcomes for children in care is a stark reminder that whilst adults seem to be talking about change, virtually nothing is happening on the ground. And no one is actually listening to our children.
Her post highlights several things ministers tend to forget whilst they’re busy patting themselves on the back for jobs seemingly well done. It costs more to see a child through the care system, than it does to send a child to Eton. Despite this, whilst children at Eton get the Rolls Royce of education and pastoral care, children in care most often face the prospect of illiteracy and physical, and emotional abuse. Here are some stats from Jackie’s piece:
- Almost one third of children in care leave school with no GCSEs at all.
- Only 6 per cent of care leavers go onto university – as opposed to 38 per cent of all young people.
- Almost 40 per cent of prisoners under 21 had been in care while they were growing up.
- children in care have a higher chance of developing mental health problems or ending up homeless.
All this we know, but we tend to forget amidst the clarion calls for reform and the loud trumpeting of more children taken into care, taken from ‘abhorrent monster parents’ to be placed in the arms of loving foster carers and residential staff.
But that’s bollocks, and we know it.
We can have as many voice of the child conferences and seminars as we like, but until we get staff on the ground to understand what it means to listen to children and to show them love and affection at the same time, these children will continue to go unseen and unheard.
Time and again we hear social workers saying they can’t show love and affection to children because it might cause emotional trauma once they’re moved on, but that is to suggest that children’s emotional development can be frozen in time once they land in care and reignited at a later date once they are ‘safely housed’ with foster carers or adoptive parents. The merits of that sentiment about safety too are questionable as children continue to be bounced around from carer to carer, let down by people who are either unable to cope with vulnerable children or are simply looking for a quick way to make cash (the debate raging around ‘salaries’ for foster carers is a big issue as well).
And all these things, over a period of time, contribute to a feeling of powerlessness and a fading voice, which with time, becomes so quiet, no one even notices it anymore.
You can catch Jackie on Twitter, for more on social affairs.
Many thanks to Maggie Tuttle for alerting us to Jackie’s blog post.
Catherine Mill said:
But that’s bollocks, and we know it.
I love your frankness and you have the energy just right.
Oh yes, all love is cut off on entering the care INSTITUTION as it was in the past.
We also changed our policy re teachers and children in about 1990- no picking up injured children and hugging them better- lest we done as a pedophile.
I still remember resigning because I could not do this in conscience.
I still see the faces of the injured children looking up at us adults and wondering why we no longer showed them any love or affection.
I was out of there.
Social workers are trained in the same way. Dr Janov makes it all clear in his work too.
I totally agree that re training of social workers and “carers” is essential.
Cutting off all love to children once in care is a crime against humanity – well to adults but not children. Its all so old patriarchal thinking and teaching that suffering is good for the child’s soul. Only a sadistic human would agree with this and certainly not some invisible man in the sky.
In 20 years I have observed social workers, Guardians, solicitors, barristers, judges etc in action re “Best interest of the child” and to say there was an ounce of love or care for any of the children would be an untruth.
What is needed is someone like Charles Pragnell to retrain the entire “pack” of social workers etc . I say pack, because they prey and hunt in packs.
I have been in contact with both Mr Timpson and Mr Loughton re children in care and the abuse taking place. Sad to say, not an ounce of care in their eyes. They were incapable of absorbing my words.So they need retraining- if it is possible. Why are these 2 men both keeping up a barrier to the pain and suffering of children.
One day with each and we look at their childhoods and there will be the answer and solution.I would gladly do it for free.I will bet they are not even aware themselves that they are shut down and so cannot feel children’s pain and suffering in state care.
I will never ever forget that woman barrister in RCJ when she laughed in my face re never prosecuting LA and foster carers-as tha would be prosecuting themselves and admitting they failed the children re rape, torture, etc. All documented . This case is there for someone with balls to take on. No, 101 solicit -ors felt it was too hot to handle and they would be threatened and blackballed if they took it on.
So what is that saying to children raped and tortured in care?
Are we listening? No
Do we care? No
Too concerned re professional reputations to care about children
If we look back at the his story of UK and its treatment of children- shitbags- remember the term- we see exactly what we think of them- they are nothing but chattels, Eve ill little creatures that make perfect adult slaves ££££.
Then we went into other sovereign nations and spread this virus of destroying children by pain and suffering because the invisible man in the sky said so.
I understand the cognitive dissonance here too, but we have to collectively look at it and admit to what we have been doing .”Where there is Love, Let us destroy it.”
We have done it.!
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Thank you for your thoughts, Catherine x
LikeLike
daveyone1 said:
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
Dana said:
Some social workers have told families their children in care don’t want to see them! If it’s the voice of the child why is their voice not heard? Why should a social worker relay the message? If the child is old enough to make that decision they should be old enough to say it directly to the family concerned. Otherwise one might think it’s the social worker making a decision, that interferes with the child’s human rights, and has a massive impact on the childs mental health, as research has found. We live in a digital age and tape recordings can be made, so there is no excuse!
LikeLike
Roger Crawford said:
Sorry for the lateness of this contribution. ‘Too concerned re our professional reputations to care about children’. Too right, Catherine Mill. I would add, ‘and our salaries’.
I think Leonard Cohen hits the nail on the head in his song ‘The Future’.
‘Give me back the Berlin Wall
Give me Stalin and St. Paul
Give me Christ
Or give me Hiroshima
Destroy another foetus now
We don’t like children anyhow
I’ve seen the future, baby:
It is murder.
Things are going to slide, slide in all directions
Won’t be nothing you can measure anymore:
The blizzard, the blizzard of the world
Has crossed the threshold
And has overturned the order
Of the soul.’
LikeLike