This just in – Fiona Woolf has decided to step down as Chair for the nationwide inquiry into child abuse in the UK.
This was due to pressure from victims’ groups who felt she was not suitable.
The panel members all appear to be intact for the time being.
It is perhaps a cruel irony, and indicative of the deeply endemic nature of the problem, that this inquiry has not yet been able to find a chair that has not somehow been involved, or come into contact with child abuse perpetrators.
Bring on the next candidate. We still think Kids Co’s Camilla Batmanghelidjh would be perfect for the job.
Dana said:
Hi Natasha, Jane Collins UKIP MEP has called for the resignation of both Teresa May and Fiona Woolf. Fiona Woolf has finally resigned, I now await the resignation of Teresa May!
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Crikey…..
LikeLike
Dana said:
http://www.ukip.org/news
LikeLike
Tom Dobbie said:
It is unbelievably sad that people with extensive powers and big salaries can find it nigh on impossible to appoint someone from the establishment (old boys crony network) who is not tainted with this national scandal of child abuse.
Our country must be seen as an entire generation of immoral child abusers by the rest of the world.
Is our country really run by a network of abusers ?
As i have already been exposed to the tactics and negligence of police, social services and judiciary in these matters, then please
nominate me for this
job and I will clean the system up, make it fit for purpose and bring the criminals to justice.
LikeLike
daveyone1 said:
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
Angry Grandparent II said:
The problem is, and the people lurking in the shadows know this, is there is little chance of finding someone who won’t be elastic for the elite or aid in the cover up because a lot of power and money is being brought into play to ensure the elite are protected.
The government won’t allow activists like Tom Watson or John Hemmings anywhere near it because they need a tame hand as a lot of high and mighty are sweating that they will be exposed and it has been suggested that a mood of “If I go down, I don’t go alone” is uniting them as one.
Look at how Jersey has faded from the public memory, they prevented the American investigative journalist access to even entering the channel islands and kept her at bay until she gave up and moved on, its interesting when the first rumblings of this terrible situation started becoming apparent, one of the local “monied” men in this rural SW town who had links to corrupt freemasonry and was part of the Jersey debacle suicided.
The problem is too large to even contemplate, I am minded of a situation of a North Dorset Conservative Councillor (this is public in the media and public record so not speculation) who was so arrogant at being untouchable, was caught driving his Jaguar blind drunk around Blandford, he didn’t lose his licence, he was not convicted but a dedicated local group of outraged people exposed his darker sides, how he took a shameless bribe to force through the destruction of a listed building to allow a Tesco to be built and then the real news hit, that he was around the county setting up internet cafes for the “community” and was utilising them to facilitate a massive child porn imagery network but did it in such a way that he used the credentials of the volunteer staff and the police, the media really couldn’t accept that little old ladies who were his usual decoys were at the heart of this and it was only when his oversure attitude dropped him in it when an elderly man was implicated who had never used a computer and because of personal circumstances had not taken up a course, was implicated as yet another octogenarian crimelord that it all unravelled.
The senior councillor of course was caught and it all came out, he never went to prison, the Conservatives finally yet still reluctantly dropped him and he was finally barred from public office or becoming involved with internet activities.
One only has to remember the harrowing case of Mark Trotter, the senior Labour councillor for Hackney who was actively protected by his party, 500 proven cases of children infected with HIV but this only came out AFTER he died, the same with a Laindon social services manager who was also a councillor, whose crimes only emerged after he died, again infecting children with AIDS and HIV.
In every county, in every council, this is going on, it isn’t Asian gangs, it isn’t small core groups either, it is an established, protected network of deviant criminals who are using public bodies and organisations to protect themselves with and are utilising Freemasonry to find like people and to ensure they are immune to the law.
People have been doing the maths in places like Jersey, in Rotherham and Rochdale, in West London, in North Wales and the myriad of other places that are buried deep from the public view. People are beginning to wake up to secret cabals like the very sinister common purpose and how it was perverted from a “mean well” group into something akin to Adolf Hitler’s Lebensborn that general social services and the family courts have all adopted considerable aspects of. I think it no coincidence that our family courts are as secret as Germany’s was, I think it no coincidence that the agents of the state are given immense powers without any recourse to law or judicial process, a German state social worker could offer as fact their opinion as freely as a British one can today and both were considered solid and undeniable evidences in the eyes of a court and whilst in Nazi Germany, to refuse the state was a capital crime, the witchhunt attitude, the destruction of the parents to attain a “win” could be interpreted along those lines.
It is very disturbing that the word, the opinion of a social worker is considered a higher quality of evidence in a balance of probability against a statement of proven fact and record. When a Nazi era court worker stated she felt that child A is at risk of… something undefinable and should become the possession of the state, is she any different from the crystal ball mysticism that is used today when a social worker states to the court that child A is at risk of something that maybe, could happen, perhaps somewhere down the line… probably with the insinuation that even if it doesn’t come to light, evil parents no doubt covered up this mystical event despite parents being of good character, of good upbringing and moral fibre.
Yet this is seen time and again, when Ian Huntley was caught finally, the police said “Yes, we made some critical errors”, the schools said “Yes we made some critical errors”, social services shamelessly said schools and the police made ALL the critical errors YET it was the social services database that they refused to share with other agencies that actually held the links to Ian Huntley’s prior concerns, that I believe today that if social services had worked with their fellow agencies, Ian Huntley would have been prevented from his later actions. What concerns me too is that some years back, Ian Huntley was revealed not to live a life in Wakefield Jail of isolation, but that of being protected and that he was given free and continual access to deviant images of children and which were NOT being smuggled in the same way as drugs and other contraband, was Ian Huntley another Thomas Hamilton? Why was the journalist who exposed this particular worrying affair mysteriously attacked in what was seen as a professional warning?
And if we consider Lebensborn, Generalplan Ost and other chillingly familiar acts of state, how the best “Aryan” children were selected for family life, for adoption, became a stock in trade even and how those that didn’t make the grade, were seen to be non Aryan, mentally defective or disabled were “graded” by a system for their future life, a simple non Aryan girl or boy would be moved to a SS childrens home for indoctrination as a sex worker, a disabled child would be euthanised, in later years of the regime, as cows and pigs became valued assets, older children captured and taken by the state would be with other “human waste” be assigned to “9” or “999” battalians and kept in barbaric minimalistic conditions and utilised for mine clearing by simply driving them into mine fields with whips and coshes to detonate mines.
Of course the latter isn’t happening BUT aspects of Lebensborn ARE. Which brings me back again to Freemasonry, which were born out of the outlawed Teuton knights who still practised for the main part ancient Talmudic necromancy which did involve some very disturbing practices towards children. The SS BrigadeFuhrer Dirlewanger that bore his name was specifically chosen from Germany’s death row for his serial crimes against women and children, his cannibalism and was given vast numbers of equally deviant men and unleashed on the Polish and Russians, he was a former German Mason before the Nazi’s abolished freemasonry. What has been a very quiet kept secret is that Dirlewanger had correspondents in Britain, across Europe and in the US, he was not a lone wolf nor was he man born without power or money. What else is concerning is that a body of psychiatry believed he was not mentally ill, depreved or criminally deviant, he was a man who believed his behaviour, his violence and his way of life was normal yet he did not fit the criteria for either sociopath or psychopath.
The binding mortar, the lifeblood, the means and the method of modern established abuse IS freemasonry because of that old Teutonic attitude to protection of their brethren, that the brethren were above the rules, the laws, the edicts of even the crown and that the brother who didn’t protect his brethren would be condemned, killed by a court of the brothers and THAT is a very disturbing fact today that for all crimes, for ALL crimes except murder, a freemason swears an oath to protect his brother Mason from prosecution of those crimes, in a Victorian “sop” to the crime of murder, a change to the oath was made in that no Mason may assist the Crown in the prosecution of a Mason charged with murder yet it is expected that a brother must not speak out against his charged fellow nor must he cooperate or offer information to the Crown against that brother even if charged to do so by warrant or court order.
These people are in charge, my local departed director was a very senior Mason, he resigned abruptly as did his deputy when it was discovered that I was in possession of emails from him to the team manager instructing her on how the county were to cover up the theft of my grandchild, of emails to the records director to ensure certain details were never given to me and have vanished into the ether, he was on a level with the local chief constable, the Lord Lieutenant of the county, if you look into how damned seriously these people take these oaths and to what extents they use to protect their brethren and that this is a false religion, promoting the worship of false gods and cabalism, of secret rite and sinister ritual, for the most part we see them all in their funny clothes going to their posh dinners and promoting their charity work but it has been said time and again of former members that the charity work is but a sham, that there are chapters within lodges, of secret “degrees” made from the elite and powerful, the “movers”, the people like directors of childrens services, the people like the chief constables, the high court judges, the MP’s and senior councillors, their abject refusal to reveal the very fact they act often illegally in courts where the law demands they declare outside interests.
Where in my own case I discovered that apart from the Judge and my solicitor who both belonged to different lodges, every person involved in my case, the foster carers husband (interestingly the solicitor who protected the aforementioned councillor above), the county solicitors husband, the team managers husband, the father of the assistant team manager, the husband of my OWN barrister, the director of children services, the manager for complaints, the manager for data access requests, the court appointed expert ALL, yes ALL belonged to the one single lodge and not ONE declared this to the courts.
Asian gangs are the brainchild of these people, we are all indoctrinated by the state and media right now to hate the Muslim who have become the cause of all our ills and this is just a very handy cover for a very criminal situation and we must look past these straw men thrown into our path, see beyond the obvious and get to grips with such as the Jersey homes, the historical and the recent because until we do, it goes on today, unchallenged, unabated and sorry I am not comfortable with that one bit.
LikeLike
Dana said:
AG, the trouble is most people don’t believe it! It’s just too off the wall for most to stomach! Unfortunately this results in people switching off in denial and disbelief. The messenger is then declared loony tunes!
The root cause may be more simple. It’s a fact that most of the ruling elite, MPs, Judges go to boarding schools. It’s childhood where behaviours are formed and become the norm. It’s not too far a stretch to use blackmail/offer a leg up the career ladder/promotions in order to control people. To facilitate and promote offbeat sexual activities, clubs are formed, where such activities continue to be the norm, introducing others who have the same desires, increasing their numbers. All very secretive!
Exploiting those desires is easy to keep it secret. Homosexuality for instance has gone from being a sexual devient to acceptable in Western cultures in a few decades. For years blackmail was the stick to beat them with!
It was not so long ago lowering the age of consent was voiced by those who move in elite circles, when will that become the norm? After al,l its so much easier to indulge your desires if you are not going to be prosceuted!
It’s not until you get a deluge of reports coming in do people start to believe that kids have been abused systematically and those “caring” for them ignored it or played it down, foisting the blame on the victim! Saville springs to mind!
We now have reports coming in from all directions about the local authorities failure to protect kids in care. There is a flurry of panic as the media spotlight is focused on them while they look for a strategy to downplay their part and pass blame onto other bodies or individuals so they can continue as before when the public outrage and criticisms has died down.
Children are nothing more than a resouce to these people! They are either being abused or they make money, mostly the two are combined. Radical reforms in care protection are necessary but the elite balk at making them. You have to ask why?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Angry Grandparent II said:
I thoroughly agree, it is a strange world they inhabit but then again, some of my forebears went through the same education, university steps and they didn’t become deviants and my grandfather refused to become an MP when it was offered to him whilst working at the GLC as he didn’t believe it was right he should be elected because it was a safe seat and that people should vote on the issues and principles and his ability to present them, not because they chase a coloured flag blindly.
And we tiptoe into another minefield, that of the suspicion, more recently voiced in that baby P programme where some of these terrible cases are allowed to happen, knowingly leaving children in danger so that councils, social workers etc can gain more from the state in their favour, I am aghast at this, I know some of us have thought this but this becomes a premeditated murder surely?
One of the more hidden bones of contention with this abuse inquiry is that a case was going to be made to throw Thomas Hamilton’s locked and closed records back to parliament to seek a new motion to have them released to the inquiry, he moved in circles that will crop up time and again with this inquiry and people are demanding that if the police or other agencies have records that would help this inquiry, they should be brought forth and we know full well the only reason they were locked in such a manner is to protect either a high ranking peer or a Royal, it is very disturbing indeed that a persons reputation is worth more than a childs life or emotional well being, that this right of protection is worth more than a given right and expectation every child should have of being protected from such people whether they are from the state or not.
What I suspect is that if this inquiry doesn’t produce some heads and some serious court cases, there is likely to be serious outrage in the community about this.
LikeLike
Dana said:
Google wiklpedia for Blue Code of Silence, or Blue Shield or Blue Wall, originally for police but appears to be extended throughout the care system among professionals!
If a whole police force can conspire against one other cop resulting in this death because he violated this unwritten code, what will other professionals do to cover up each others crimes?
LikeLike
Dana said:
Also on wiklpedia, Snow Job or Cover Up for a list of actions and non actions that those seeking to cover up wrongdoings do!
LikeLike
Pingback: A Fortnight in the Life of the Overarching Child Sexual Abuse Inquiry. Where now? | cathyfox