A new video produced by charity Just For Kids Law, under the pretext that it is trying to support parents going through child protection proceedings is thinly veiled propaganda which includes dangerous child protection advice.
The video, which is just under three minutes long, follows a young girl who was once in care and who now finds herself going through child protection proceedings after becoming pregnant. Whilst the animation is really nothing more than an advertisement for the charity’s legal services, it is the way in which it treats young parents that is so offensive – and so wide of the mark that it amounts to bullying.
Entitled, “If I Could Talk To Me”, the story approaches child protection proceedings as if the mother whose case we’re watching has gone back in time to advise her younger self to do things differently. Right from the start, the assumption that’s being made is that this young mother has been difficult, or obstructive, or, god forbid, independent minded in her view of the proceedings.
It’s not a great start.
And using the woman’s older self to sell the ideas in this video is a manipulative tactic designed to give young parents the impression that they would give themselves this advice, and that they should therefore trust what’s being said – after all, ‘they’ are saying it.
As the story progresses, there are vague nods to the prejudices and assumptions child protection professionals may make that will lead to the young mother in the video being stigmatised – and unfairly treated – but these issues are brushed over and the young mum is asked to accept all of those injustices – and potential human rights breaches – as a matter of course. It’s a deeply disturbing three minutes of viewing.
The video is also filled with dishonest rhetoric. At one point the young mum’s older self tells her, “It’s the process that makes it so hard – not the people.” We know that’s not true. There is an extensive track record today, of child protection professionals making the process unbelievably hard for parents, through all the prejudices the video makes references to – whether it’s assuming a mother or father is unfit to parent because they’ve been in care (how can this starting point ever be allowed in best practice?) or because they’ve been in an abusive relationship. Assumptions are dangerous, and this video unfortunately plays on care leavers’ worst fears, too.
At one point, the mum’s older self asks her not to take “the most personal thing in the world personally.” She is referring to child protection proceedings and the deeply invasive way they work. It’s a ridiculous request, and one which turns the clock back on new and progressive research which shows quite clearly that these processes don’t work if the emotional elements are ignored. Asking young, potentially vulnerable parents to shoulder all of the harsh realities of the system is a disgrace, and should never be part of child protection practice.
Another sentiment made during the film, which is narrated by the young mum’s older self, is that she will be “judged for things in her past that were never her fault.” Another, terrible reality of the system, which here is being openly acknowledged and accepted as the norm. It beggars belief.
It’s with enormous sadness that we write this post. Researching Reform has for a long while, been a passionate advocate of Just For Kids, but we no longer feel that way.
Watch the video for yourself and tell us what you think. Have we been unfair? Is it more balanced than we’ve given it credit for? Let us know.
AnnoyedIrishMan said:
Reblogged this on BertieS.
LikeLiked by 2 people
truthaholics said:
Reblogged this on | truthaholics and commented:
Another great post, exposing naked propaganda backfiring for profit! The way in which blind prejudices racked against natural parents caught up in safeguarding and care proceedings play out, is itself an abuse of process hence undemocratic. Most lamentable is lack of access to EFFECTIVE legal representation at critical times, with many parents still reporting legally-aided lawyers who cross over to bat for the local authority instead of the natural parents, thus circumventing meaningful access to justice as well as a right to a fair trial.
LikeLiked by 3 people
maureenjenner said:
Reblogged this on Musings of a Penpusher and commented:
The voice-over is harsh and the message hard and uncompromising; a bit like the life portrayed. Never a bed of roses, this youngster has to come to terms with the realities of life in a system that offers no feather bed. Dickens eat your heart out for it seems little has changed, yet we all hope some things are better.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ian Josephs said:
Horrific, horrific ! Did anyone notice the stat at the end? It says 10% of care leavers who are pregnant have their baby removed at birth ! So in effect the care system is a breeding ground for taking babies for adoption (for where else would they go?)
And who are these clowns sitting round a table and voting on whether a mum should be allowed to keep her baby? Yes who the hell are they to judge? How dare they take part in legal kidnapping of infants from defenceless young girls finding themseles at the mercy of a brutal care system ?
Sack the lot of them and leave the police to deal with the crime of child abuse and the world would be a better place !
LikeLiked by 4 people
wenevergiveup2015 said:
A true speaker as usual. They are breeding within the system and the “evidence “ shows this. The young parents who are in long term foster care mostly. They tell the public the rates are going down in fact this is far from the truth. Because of this Baby farming police should be acting and “not “ protecting them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dr. Manhattan. said:
Completely agree Ian.
its a disgrace but how can these crimes be brought to justice. Social workers and their managers are protected behind a wall of Secrecy and LA support. thats why they are as bad as they are.
LikeLiked by 1 person
wenevergiveup2015 said:
Yes Ian you are sadly correct. They are breeding these children in fostercare and taking there babies 15-18 yrs most under 17. What does one do with no experience in law procedures and ppl to scared to touch it. The money wheel spinning babies disappearing and these poor young adults loosing their babies,were loosing count, unless told. Police refuse to step in so it carries on, I believe one day these youngsters will get justice when they we can get them there not one but all of them. Breaking enactments in the name of “child protection “ the stats are high.
LikeLiked by 1 person
wenevergiveup2015 said:
Reblogged this on Site Title and commented:
They target young ones of the system “ child protection “
LikeLiked by 2 people
Mehrnaz Allawi said:
Brilliant observation as always and well done for speaking out on behalf of all those who are unable or do not have the platform. Let’s hope they apologise and remove this offensive video!
LikeLiked by 4 people
daveyone1 said:
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
Dr. Manhattan. said:
“its the Process that makes it so hard not the people”
this is the biggest Lie in the Video. in fact its the exact opposite. its the LA and their Social workers who make it so hard for the parents and children who are captured in their Gigantic Dragnet of Victims.
LikeLiked by 2 people
HOLLIE GREIG JUSTICE said:
Reblogged this on HOLLIE GREIG JUSTICE and commented:
reblogged
LikeLike
no thanks said:
I think you have gone a bit far. This advice is for the people in the thick of it. It’s not a “here is the truth” video. It’s really important to keep focused on working with the crappy deal you’re dealt WHEN you’re in the thick of it. That is GOOD ADVICE. if you focus on the injustice in the thick of it, you loose. When you’re out of it; if you’re researching reform; sure it’s a crap video. But it’s not written for you.
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Thanks for your comment. We are aware the video isn’t written for us, our post makes that clear. Our concern relates to the dangerous messages the video pushes in order to coerce compliance, not the realities of the system.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Richard Grenville said:
Its a snapshot of what is a long and tedious process for the young people caught up in this and plays into the confirmatory bias and the unwritten but widely enforced narrative that the system and those who administer it, follow to the letter.
What needs to be done is for the narrative to be opposed and dismantled and that those involved are taught not to be so gullible to the confirmatory bias that they slavishly follow.
LikeLike