One of our greatest bug bears here at Researching Reform is the continued insistence by government, foster care and adoption agencies of trying to source carers for vulnerable children through financial incentives. It is a battle we have been fighting for several years and we are dismayed by the current figures showing a sharp rise in children going missing from foster care.
Clearly, the current system does not work, and it is making things worse.
As far back as 2012, adoption agencies for example, have been at liberty to not only advertise children for adoption, using their photos, names and other personal details, but they have shown no hesitation in using so-called ‘benefits’ to attract carers. Remember Foster Care Agent? They were, and still are, an active agency looking to recruit foster carers through financial incentives like holiday breaks, income and other sources of financial ‘reward’.
“The reality is that ££ grab people’s attention, just as it has yours.” Yes, but the difference is that we are not looking to take children into our home so that we can increase our income. We are reading on, in horror.
Google the phrase “why foster care fails” and what comes back is astounding. From glaring oversights where children have been subjected to the most awful sexual and emotional abuse, to the ongoing debate over whether carers should be paid ‘professionally’ for parenting often very vulnerable children (the comments section makes for enlightening reading), the one thing that seems to be missing from these discussions is the critical aspect of love.
As long as we allow cost to dominate the debate in foster care, we will never make any headway in helping distressed children blossom into confident, happy adults. And whilst everyone understands that looking after a child is an expensive affair, this element of parenting, because that is really what this is all about, should be very much secondary to ensuring that these children get what they need – a loving, and secure home.
We already know that placements break down because the families taking in children are not prepared or able to look after and love them, and we also know that a lack of stability runs through the entire system, making children feel even less cared for and secure. The most commonly cited factors for foster care placement breakdown are:
- A change of social worker
- Over-optimistic expectations
- Placement breakdown, particularly for teenagers
- Any policy or practice which generally discourages children from remaining fostered after the age of 17
- The child’s level of emotional disturbance and motivation to remain in the placement also appears to be a key factor.
It should be obvious that these factors cannot in any way be addressed by financial incentivisation. What we see is a system which is under incredible strain, staffed by fleeting and often less than competent professionals, and far too many carers who are clearly not fit to love and care for these children. Financial incentive does not target and attract the right carers – it simply fulfils a function by dumping children with anyone who will take them.
Isn’t it time we looked at the way foster care, and adoption is run in this country?
Researching Reform 
On the back of a bus in Suffolk a huge poster advertising “be a foster parent and earn £590/week per week per child !! Nice work especially if you can get 3 or 4 kids at the same time but a great incentive to stop the original parents recovering their children by badmouthing the parents and brainwashing the kids over a concentrated periods of time
LikeLike
Strange it only printed half the sentence above.
On the back of a bus in Suffolk was a huge poster advertising “be a fosterer and earn £590 per child per week !” Photo on my forced adoption site .
If fosterers receive 3 or 4 kids they get over £2000/week ! Very nice and a good motive to brainwash children into disliking the parents who the kids think left them there as the parents were not allowed to explain the truth at contact.
LikeLike
Is it any wonder that fostering of children in the UK is a multibillion pound industry and is drawing in thousands of unemployed people from all walks of life this to include kids from the age of 18 BEING ASKED TO FOSTER then take into account the free fostering allowance grants for home improvements to make more rooms for more kids to be fostered, free holidays of the carers choice with the child sent to a respite carer then there are the insurances cars petrol special mortgages for foster carers you name it the fostering is huge, and what of the social workers from ???? many working illegally and are given government grants of many thousands of pound for reallocation then they bring their friends over tell them what to do and say so they become foster carer my god it is never ending and don’t any one reply and say its all rubbish what i write, remember i run the help line and i hear all this along with the years of researching, so what is it the Governments are doing to our children, i do agree there are many children need foster care and i know there are some wonderful carers along with many good social workers but the whole system goes back to control of the population via the children and the elderly with the SS in charge and yes Mr Hitler’s legacy “IN A CHILDS BEST INTEREST” what interest our kids in care are even used for drug experiments, every kid going into care within days has a psychiatrist psychologist anger management team most kids are diagnosed as dyslexia then in comes the CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKERS every kid in care has so many people in its life to include being moved from different foster and adopted carers on the pretence that the kids are naughty well well more money in the system because every time a kid is moved the agencies get paid, so not many kids will have stability and when they do leave the system and have a family low and behold in comes the SS to take their children, and i hear of this every day, then take into account the social workers with many registering their own out side companies for assessments and yes bed and breakfast in readiness when kids are leaving the care, we have to thank Natasha for giving people the chance to report on her blog but sadly it goes no where as the kids in the UK are a multibillion pound industry “In a child’s best interest”
http://www.richmond.gov.uk/home/council/news/press_office/older_news/december_2014/dedicated_foster_carer_benefits_from_29k_house_extension.htm?viewmode=pr
LikeLike
THIS SAYS IT ALL
UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS IT CLEARLY STATES CHILDREN ARE NOT TO BE SOLD
SO IF THE UNITED NATIONS CAN BREAK THE LAWS THEN WHAT CHANCE HAVE WE THE KIDS OF THE WORLD GOT ONLY TO BE SOLD BY THE FOSTER AND ADOPTION AGENCIES THEN ABUSED IN EVERY WAY.
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/OPSCCRC.aspx
Article 1
States Parties shall prohibit the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography as provided for by the present Protocol.
Article 2
For the purposes of the present Protocol:
(a) Sale of children means any act or transaction whereby a child is transferred by any person or group of persons to another for remuneration or any other consideration;
SALE OF CHILDREN AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING BY TRANSACTION FOR MONEY
(b) Child prostitution means the use of a child in sexual activities for remuneration or any other form of consideration;
(c) Child pornography means any representation, by whatever means, of a child engaged in real or simulated explicit sexual activities or any representation of the sexual parts of a child for primarily sexual purposes.
Article 3
1. Each State Party shall ensure that, as a minimum, the following acts and activities are fully covered under its criminal or penal law, whether such offences are committed domestically or transnationally or on an individual or organized basis:
(a) In the context of sale of children as defined in article 2:
(i) Offering, delivering or accepting, by whatever means, a child for the purpose of:
OFFERING BY ANY MEANS YES A CHILD FOR PROFIT
a. Sexual exploitation of the child;
b. Transfer of organs of the child for profit;
c. Engagement of the child in forced labour;
(ii) Improperly inducing consent, as an intermediary, for the adoption of a child in violation of applicable international legal instruments on adoption;
(b) Offering, obtaining, procuring or providing a child for child prostitution, as defined in article 2;
(c) Producing, distributing, disseminating, importing, exporting, offering, selling or possessing for the above purposes child pornography as defined in article 2.
2. Subject to the provisions of the national law of a State Party, the same shall apply to an attempt to commit any of the said acts and to complicity or participation in any of the said acts.
3. Each State Party shall make such offences punishable by appropriate penalties that take into account their grave nature.
4. Subject to the provisions of its national law, each State Party shall take measures, where appropriate, to establish the liability of legal persons for offences established in paragraph 1 of the present article. Subject to the legal principles of the State Party, such liability of legal persons may be criminal, civil or administrative.
5. States Parties shall take all appropriate legal and administrative measures to ensure that all persons involved in the adoption of a child act in conformity with applicable international legal instruments.
—————————————————————————————-
LikeLike
Foster care doesn’t work for the kids!
Financial incentives attract those who want to make money and are not the least interested in the child or what happens to that child in the future but shush… social services know this but they have targets to reach! Few fosteres do it for altruistic reasons. Easy to check though, take away the money & incentives and see who would foster then. They would be crushed in the rush to leave fostering!
Moira McGrath Tierney of Baltimore Social Services explains how social services dismantle families and how the kids are left traumatised. Seen as a success for the social services but the price is paid by the child and it’s family
latinalista.com/2014/tuesday-video-rethinking-foster-care
What is going on in the US is exactly what is happening here in the UK.
LikeLike
David Cameron PM has it right for once! In his speech about Landmark reforms he voiced we, the State, is failing the children! That’s an understatement!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
I would like to share a story that illustrates the corrosive impact that inadequate foster carers can have when colluding with equally inadequate Social Workers in the barbaric ‘UK Child Protection System’. It is related to the unpalatable topic of child-on-child sex which is frequently reported in abuse survivor literature and occasionally makes it into mainstream media:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/533091/EXCLUSIVE-Charities-claim-satanic-abuse-children-rife
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/533158/Child-abusers-filmed-murder-claims-charity
This kind of extreme child abuse appears to be practised in secret societies that tend to be based on ideological aberrations of religions, political power structures and/or commercial sexual exploitation.
A single mother attempted to obtain a police report regarding a sexual assault on her child. The account provided by the mother would suggest to any neutral observer that the mother was rather obviously ‘set up’ in a child trafficking sting and fell for a trap. Police, Paediatrician, Social Workers and Psychiatrists found it ‘easier’ to claim that the mother was delusional then squaring up to an utterly dangerous serial offender. Vital evidence was withheld from a Clinical Psychologist who meekly went along with what everyone else had said – completely failing to cover the two ‘index incidents’ in the final interview.
While in ‘foster care’ the boy had 5 chest infections in 12 months, head lice on 3 occasions, cuts and bruises at several occasions, became anaemic as another ‘blood sample’ had been taken (as the original one allegedly ‘got lost’) and wore shoes that were too small. He showed exactly the kind of temper tantrums that a toddler would show who had been traumatised through a sexual assault and was being prevented through a regime of secrecy from talking about exactly that topic – his trauma.
Due to the ‘made up’ diagnosis Schizophrenic-Schizoid-Paranoid of an inadequate Psychiatrist the mother was not allowed to have unsupervised contact and was immediately censored when getting onto personal topics in contact. However due to a kind of ‘secret language’ that the two developed the mother concluded that a female toddler also taken into the care of the same foster family was ‘getting it’ from her boy. In addition a new born baby had been added to the foster family thus netting around £60k tax free per annum for providing ‘care’.
The female foster carer had provided extremely unfavourable (and seemingly ‘made-up’) evidence against the mother and may well have encountered her some 10 years earlier in the context of an Organised Ritualised Crime Abuse Network (ORCAN). A compromise allegation against the 1st Psychiatrist (who made self-incriminating remarks) was ignored by Council, legal aid solicitor, social workers, guardian and judge (who reportedly encountered the mother when she was a teenager).
More information on this case and ORCANs can be found here:
https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-28/october-2015/close-encounters-psychological-kind
LikeLike
“Dump them with anyone who will take them” just about sums up the foster care & adoption industry.
Barely non existent checks (CRB’s, not really worth the paper they are written on ) on potential candidates to off load the the kids onto. This might be the reason why 1 in 4 kids (estimated but considered to be just the tip of the iceberg) are abused whilst in care!
Family members disregarded with the stupid belief ” the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree”. Funny how that mentality is dropped and parents are not blamed when it concerns someone higher up the pecking order!
However, some beliefs are changing.
In America, Moira McGrath Tierney is not a lone voice. Changing their models of social work practice have resulted in better outcomes for the children and communities. How have they achieved this when before they have failed?
They have changed their mindset to include the “family of origin”. Such a simple concept. They are making funding availiable to invest in families and not in “placements”
http://www.social work today.com/archive/031109p30.shtml
http://www.latinalista.com/2014/tuesday-video-rethinking-foster-care
If this link doesn’t work, Google “rethinking foster care” and the TEDx Talk of Moira Mc Grath Tierney will show up.
If you are not convinced that foster care does not work, you will be, after hearing what she says about social services and how they have failed the kids and their families in the past and what they are now doing to change the dire outcomes for the kids in care.
LikeLike
http://www.socialworktoday.com/archive/031109p30.shtml
LikeLike
If we was to believe there are less then 80.000 kids in care then how come there are 100s of agencies throughout this country all making untold thousands with some making millions from what less then 80.000 kids and I know 1001% the guy who registers for the social workers foster and adoption agencies and boy what a fiddle it costs pennies to register the company and do remember social workers registering their own companies already work and get pain by the SS so yes they all have direct contact to the kids as they are the ones stealing the kids, how many Lords Sirs Government people legal people all have shares in the agencies, truth as I have always said is with the Nation but we are the plebs so as they say UP YOURS “In a child’s best interest” As for the thousands of child abused victims just think on can the Governments REALLY allow the evidence to be told as we are talking billions of pounds in INSURANCE CLAIMES and people are not that stupid not to know that Tony Blair is part of the Insurance company and the big insurance company that also rules the SS so of course its another cover up for victims of abuse on the words of where is your evidence and you are out of time, well the evidence is in the child’s body which has been sexually abused and any doctor knows this along with the victims distraught mind,
I WOULD SAY THE GOVERNMENTS ARE THE PLEBS WHAT DO THEY KNOW ONLY HOW TO ABUSE THE KIDS TAKE THE MONEY AND DEBATE AND DEBATE AT THE TAX PAYERS EXPENCE IN THE LORDS AND THE COMMONS WITH FOOD BOOZE PAID FOR BY THE TAX PAYERS. AND WHEN I AM AT THE GATES OF HEAVEN THEN THEY WILL ALL FACE A PLEB AND BE SENT TO HELL
LikeLike
More like double that figure! 160,000 s.47 investigations which will almost always entail entail foster care during the investigation (p.8 of the report)
Click to access SFR41-2015_Text.pdf
LikeLike
Hi Mike, as in the link on your comment as I have copied here which states most kids in care have been abused or neglected, what a load of rubbish they write and want the people to believe, I agree many children need support and their parents imprisoned if abuse and neglect has been proven as opposed to hear say, but I know of the thousands of families who have never hurt their child along with grandparents who would give a loving home I also know of many grandparents who have used their life savings on legal teams to home the grandchild they love, but grandparents are also put down as abusers, and yet there are more abused kids in care then kids with families who may have abused them in some way. The Great British Empire which has been and still is so corrupt will only give false figures to the Nation, It would be fantastic if ALL children and grandchildren of the so called Lords Ministers Sirs and MPs were questioned of being abused, bet there would be many BUT THEN WE CAN SEE THIS IN THE CHARICTERS OF THE BLOODY LOT OF THEM, and as I know so well they are all brought up by au-pares going onto public schools , then follow daddy and mummy into Parliament to be paid untold money and to tell the Nation lies and as we know to steal the kids into care so them in power who are paedophiles can HAVE AXCESS to abuse them with no come back and when caught out it is OH SORRY I HAVE MEMORY LOSS, it is time the Nation put a stop to this so called GREAT BRITISH EMPIRE THAT HAS ABUSED AND SOLD KIDS FROM DOT.
Most children’s primary need is due to abuse or neglect and the proportion is up on last year, from 47.2% to 49.4%. Family dysfunction is the second most common need, 17.9% this year down from 18.6% last year.
4.5
0.9
2.6
0.5
2.0
17.9
9.2
2.8
10.2
49.4
N0 – Not stated
N9 – Cases other than children in need
N8 – Absent parenting
N7 – Low income
N6 – Socially unacceptable behaviour
N5 – Family dysfunction
N4 – Family in acute stress
N3 – Parent’s disability or illness
N2 – Child’s disability or illness
N1 – Abuse or neglect
LikeLike
If there are almost 400,000 kids in need at any one time, why take any child into care? Surely it makes more sense to strengthen all families and put the money into keeping the child within the family.
I have a problem with family courts taking a child into care on the “balance of probabilities” After all that is just someone’s opinion! We all know how peoples opinions change according to whatever variables are at work.
LikeLike
And yet the answer is so simple !
1:- Take into care, only children from parents charged with or convicted of a serious offence against children.
2:- Scrap all gagging orders against parents and children so that both may speak freely at contact or report abuse in care or complain of injustices in court at public meetings or via the media.
LikeLike
and give grandparents rights
LikeLike
Butterbox Babies (Official Trailer) – YouTube
Video for butterbox babies information▶ 3:21
25 Apr 2014 – Uploaded by Sullivan Entertainment
“Butterbox Babies” is the shocking true story of Lila and William Young, owners of the Ideal Maternity Home …
The Butter Box Babies my god the bloody world has known and allowed child abuse to go on for 100s of years Butter Box Babies in Canada is one of the most horrendous abuse of babies but because of the money was ALLOWED to continue just as it is and has happened in THIS SO CALLED BRITISH EMPIRE
LikeLike
EVERY TIME A PARENT OR GRANDPARENT REPORTS ABUSE TO A CHILD IN CARE THE CONTACT IS STOPPED SO AGAIN THE COVER UPS THATS ALL THE BLOODY GOVERNMENTS DO IS TO SAY AND DO NOTHING AND THE KIDS CONTINUE TO BE ABUSED PLEASE READ THE LINK
LikeLike
In the news
Image for the news result
Canada’s Dark Secret: Forgotten Case of Duplessis Orphans
Sputnik International – 18 hours ago
These children later became known as the Duplessis orphans. Thousands of children died …
YES AND HOW MANY WERE SOLD FROM BARNARDO TO CANADA AND BECAME THE DUPLESSES ORPHANS
LikeLike
IS IT ANY WONDER THAT BRITIAN NAMED ITS SELF THE GREAT BRITISH EMPIRE AFTER SENDING THOUSANDS OF THE BRITISH CHILDREN TO CANADA ONLY FOR MANY BABIES TO BECOME PART OF THE BUTTERBOX BABIES AND THE DUPLESSES BABIES
LikeLike
Fostering, The Fostering Partnership, Eden Foster Care and Seafields Fostering; Caretech
Foster Care AssociatesFoster Care Associates logo
Owned by: Jim Cockburn and Janet Rees through Ideapark Ltd
Income from foster care in 2014**: £127.2m
Payouts to owner in 2014: £7m
Highest paid director salary and other benefits: £406,000
Who says us directors can’t make money out of fostering????????
LikeLike
What happened to “conflict of interests?”.
LikeLike
Pingback: Sharing Vulnerable Children’s Details Online – Are UK Fostering Agencies Feeding Child Trafficking? | Researching Reform
Pingback: Sharing Vulnerable Children’s Details Online – Are UK Fostering Agencies Feeding Child Trafficking? by Natasha | HOLLIE GREIG JUSTICE : SUPPORTING FRESH START @FSFtruthjustice