Purpler Winter, an annual social media campaign which goes viral every year, highlights and raises awareness around child abuse.

The campaign, which launches tomorrow on Twitter for just 24 hours, urges social media users to wear a purple item and share snapshots of themselves, while also talking about ways to spot, and stem, child abuse in its many forms.

People from around the world use this day to upload images and videos of support in a variety of languages. The campaign is supported by charities, celebrities, and survivors of childhood abuse.

If you are a Twitter user and you’d like to take part in the campaign, log in to the platform and type in #PurplerWinter, for all the latest updates and ideas on how you can get involved.

A family court expert in Australia has been charged with sexually abusing three children. The development could lead to contact decisions previously made using the expert’s reports being overturned.

The psychologist was hired as a Family Court expert to make contact recommendations in cases where one parent had accused the other of sexual abuse.

In one report, the court psychologist – who has not been named – recommended that a child continue to live with the father after the mother raised allegations of sexual abuse, telling the court he found no significant evidence the abuse had occurred.

The news comes after research showed judges were far more likely to award contact to a parent after they make an allegation of parental alienation in cases where the other parent brings up an allegation of child sexual abuse.

The suspect remains on bail and the case’s next hearing is scheduled for October.

The article, which was published by Australia’s ABC news outlet, also talks about concerning problems inside Australia’s care system, which mimic the UK care system’s challenges.

The topics include unfit registration processes for expert witnesses which allow individuals to write up expert reports without the necessary qualifications, to an inability to get complaints properly assessed because ombudsmen continuously claim they do not have the power to investigate them.

Further reading:

• Mothers In Australia Told To Lie To The Family Court About Domestic Violence
• Expert Witness Scheme To Be Rolled Out Across English and Welsh Family Courts
• Loophole Allows Unqualified Psychologists To Practice

Many thanks to Charles Pragnell for alerting us to this case.

The Sunday Mirror has launched a campaign to highlight the number of children murdered by their parents after a nine-month probe carried out by the tabloid. 

The probe found that 63 children had been killed by their parents from 2004 to 2019.

The data collected confirmed that 52 of the 63 children were killed by fathers known to authorities for domestic abuse. A further seven children were killed by both parents in cases where the fathers had similar histories. 

All of the children who died had parents who were known to either police, social workers or family courts for being violent. 

The investigation also revealed that family members often tried to warn authorities about the dangers but were ignored. 

The “Save Kids from Violent Parents” campaign aims to ensure that parents and carers convicted of violent crimes, child abuse or sexual offences and known to the authorities do not have automatic access to their children.

The campaign is calling for an amendment to the Government’s domestic abuse bill which would make it harder for violent parents to have contact. 

Shadow Home Office minister Carolyn Harris is set to table the amendment to the Government’s domestic abuse bill in response to the newspaper’s investigation.

Domestic violence charity Refuge is working in collaboration with the Sunday Mirror. 

Chief executive Sandra Horley told the Sunday Mirror:

“Domestic abuse needs to be taken more seriously by family courts as children are paying for decisions around contact, sometimes with their lives. Ending unsafe contact and improving how family courts respond to domestic abuse is essential if we are to end this widespread problem.”

The Sunday Mirror’s campaign features three demands:

“1. A change in the law, which means anyone who has been convicted of violent crime, child abuse or sexual offences can’t have automatic, unsupervised access to their kids. The same rules would apply to those who’d had similar findings made against them in the civil courts.

The ban could only be overturned by a judge if the parent had undergone a thorough assessment by an independent expert proving they have been rehabilitated.

2. Mandatory, standardised training in domestic abuse for judges, social workers and any other professionals involved in child access arrangements.

We also want to see domestic abuse training for coroners overseeing domestic homicide inquests.

3. More State funding to support the hundreds of thousands of children in the UK affected by domestic abuse – including the 3,627 kids currently being supported by Refuge.

It is only with the right support, such as specialist therapy, that these children can recover from the trauma they have experienced.”

You can read more about the campaign here. (WARNING: The article contains details about child deaths). 

Welcome to another week.

Several high profile peers called on the government to introduce legislation that would make it compulsory for child welfare professionals to report suspicions of child abuse in a debate in the House of Lords.

The calls came during a discussion on the Victims of Crime (Rights, Entitlements, and Notification of Child Sexual Abuse) Bill, on 19 July, which was having its second reading.

The Bill contains a clause (clause 11), which places a statutory responsibility on “any person who works in a regulated profession or works with children in a regulated activity [to] make a notification… if, in the course of his or her work, they discover that a child appears to have been subject to an act of sexual abuse.”

The Bill could also be amended to place a duty on members of the clergy to report child abuse after the Archbishop of Canterbury told the nation’s child abuse inquiry that reporting by clergy should also be made compulsory.

The government dismissed proposals for legislation to make reporting mandatory after it carried out a consultation on the matter in 2016. The results of the consultation were published in 2018.

The Department of Education said that the majority of submissions it received argued against the idea of a mandatory duty to report. That was not the case.

Of the 768 responses it received, 12% wanted to implement a duty right away, while 63% were in favour of allowing the Government’s existing programme of reforms time to be implemented before considering additional statutory measures.

Ireland made reporting child sexual abuse mandatory in 2017. 

The debate in the Lords highlighted several important points. The first was that the consultation was carried out at a time when the government’s understanding of child abuse was not as great as it is now.

A growing body of research shows clearly that mandatory reporting does not interfere with the running of child protection agencies or bodies, nor does it cause harmful delays or increase costs inside the child protection system. We also know from the research that it can reduce instances of child abuse.

Calls for a mandatory duty to report during the discussion came from Baroness Brinton, the Bishop of Rochester, Lord Marks of Henley-On-Thames and Baroness Benjamin.

The debate also outlined significant findings by the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) on the rise of child sexual abuse images online, particularly imagery involving girls between the ages of 11 and 13. Some of the data shared in the debate included the finding that from 1 January to 30 June, the IWF handled 22,484 reports of self-generated child sexual abuse content. Of those reports, 96% featured girls.

Although the minority of IWF reports included boys, we must not forget them. A study carried out by Interpol in 2018 found that while boys accounted for one third of child victims online, they were more likely than girls to suffer the worst kinds of child sexual abuse. 

While the peers didn’t look at this aspect of abuse in relation to boys, they chose instead to address the abuse boys suffered at the Peterborough and Southampton Football Clubs by football coach, Bob Higgins.

They also discussed the double jeopardy rule and how it affected child sexual abuse cases, making reference to a meeting with solicitor Dino Nocivelli, who is representing six of the football club abuse survivors. Dino launched a petition asking the government to remove the double jeopardy rule for all sexual offences.

This debate is a must read, for its advocacy on a compulsory duty to report – which Researching Reform fully supports – and for the very important information it contains.

Further reading:

• Should child welfare professionals be made to report child abuse? – The case for and against (Lexis Nexis)
• Victims of Crime (Rights, Entitlements, and Notification of Child Sexual Abuse) Bill – Second Reading (The debate)
• Victims of Crime (Rights, Entitlements, and Notification of Child Sexual Abuse) Bill [HL] 2017-19 (Follow the Bill here, and read the draft documents)
• Government To Launch Consultation On Mandatory Reporting Of Child Abuse (2016)
• Government Explains Reason Behind Blocking Duty To Report Abuse (2018)
• Department For Education Blocks Mandatory Reporting Of Abuse – And Survivors From Suing Councils (2018)
• ITV Exposé On Sexual Assaults At Boarding Schools Calls For Mandatory Reporting Of Abuse (2018
• BBC’s ‘Three Girls’ Re-Ignites Debate Over Mandatory Reporting Of Child Abuse
• Survivor Calls For Mandatory Reporting Of Child Abuse (2017)