• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • Guide To Making A Subject Access Request
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Daily Archives: October 5, 2022

Pre-mobile bruising in babies should not automatically lead to child protection investigations, review panel says

05 Wednesday Oct 2022

Posted by Natasha in Researching Reform

≈ 1 Comment

A briefing paper by the government’s Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel has advised that bruising found in pre-mobile babies should not automatically lead to social workers launching a Section 47 inquiry.

Section 47 Inquiries, which are outlined in the Children’s Act 1989, are carried out by social workers in local authorities if they say they have reasonable cause to suspect that a child living our found in their area is suffering or likely to suffer significant harm.

Current guidelines about pre-mobile bruising for social workers and other health practitioners, established by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) say that where practitioners see bruises and ‘suspect’ abuse or maltreatment, they “should refer the child… to children’s social care, following local multi-agency arrangements.”

However, the review panel said it did not support “blanket policies that require Section 47s or other interventions without an initial appraisal of the circumstances of the presentation”. The panel also raised concerns that local authorities across the country were interpreting the process for launching Section 47 inquiries in ways which did not always reflect the laws or the guidance in place.

The panel made five recommendations, including clarifying current guidance, requiring a review by a health professional who has the right expertise to assess the bruise and other connected injuries, and reviews by all safeguarding partners of their current policies on bruising in non-mobile infants to make sure they are in line with the evidence base and national guidelines.

Pre-mobile bruising in babies is a controversial area in child protection. Once-accepted research on the phenomenon suggested that this kind of bruising was rare and more likely to be caused by abuse. New research has challenged this notion, and suggests instead that such bruises are much more common than first thought and can be caused accidentally by the babies themselves.

The panel’s briefing paper will be seen as a welcome development for families with experience of child protective services whose children have been removed from their care or who have been exposed to child protection proceedings, without cause.

Useful links:

  • Panel briefing on pre-mobile bruising in babies
  • Review panel page (including a full list of panel members)
  • Helpful article on the development in Community Care
Photo by Daniel Reche on Pexels.com

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,452 other subscribers

Contact Researching Reform

Huff Post Contributer

For Litigants in Person

Child Welfare Debates

October 2022
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Sep   Nov »

Children In The Vine : Stories From The Family Justice System

Categories

  • Adoption
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and The Court of Protection
  • Articles
  • Big Data
  • Bills
  • Case Study
  • child abuse
  • child abuse inquiry
  • child welfare
  • Children
  • Children In The Vine
  • Circumcision
  • Civil Partnerships
  • Consultation
  • Conversations With…
  • Corporal Punishment
  • CSA
  • CSE
  • Data Pack
  • Domestic Violence
  • Encyclopaedia on Family and The Law
  • event
  • Family Law
  • Family Law Cases
  • FGM
  • FOI
  • forced adoption
  • Foster Care
  • Fudge of the Week
  • Fultemian Project
  • Huffington Post
  • Human Rights
  • IGM
  • Inquiry
  • Interesting Things
  • Interview
  • Judge of the Week
  • Judges
  • judicial bias
  • Law to lust for
  • legal aid
  • LexisNexis Family Law
  • LIP Service
  • LIPs
  • Marriage
  • McKenzie Friends
  • MGM
  • News
  • Notes
  • petition
  • Picture of the Month
  • Podcast
  • Question It
  • Random Review
  • Real Live Interviews
  • Research
  • Researching Reform
  • social services
  • social work
  • Spotlight
  • Stats
  • Terrorism
  • The Buzz
  • The Times
  • Troubled Families Programme
  • Twitter Conversations
  • Update
  • Voice of the Child
  • Voice of the Child Podcast
  • Westminster Debate
  • Who's Who Cabinet Ministers
  • Your Story

Recommended

  • Blawg Review
  • BlogCatalog
  • DaddyNatal
  • DadsHouse
  • Divorce Survivor
  • Enough Abuse UK
  • Family Law Week
  • Family Lore
  • Flawbord
  • GeekLawyer's Blog
  • Head of Legal
  • Just for Kids Law
  • Kensington Mums
  • Law Diva
  • Legal Aid Barristers
  • Lib Dem Lords
  • Lords of The Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • PAIN
  • Paul Bernal's Blog
  • Public Law Guide
  • Pupillage Blog
  • Real Lawyers Have Blogs
  • Story of Mum
  • Sue Atkins, BBC Parenting Coach
  • The Barrister Blog
  • The Magistrate's Blog
  • The Not So Big Society
  • Tracey McMahon
  • UK Freedom of Information Blog
  • WardBlawg

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 813 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: