In the news 28 Friday Jan 2022 Posted by Natasha in Researching Reform ≈ 3 Comments The latest child welfare items that should be right on your radar: State did not make legal errors in forced adoption scandal, court rules (Netherlands)VIDEO: Mothers call for apology following historic forced adoptions (Scotland)Confronting Canada’s history of forced adoption (Canada) Share this:TweetWhatsAppEmailTelegramPocketShare on TumblrPrintLike this:Like Loading...
The first article makes me sick and I’ve not read the other 2 articles yet.
‘At the same time, the council may have acted illegally in some cases, but now, 50 years on, it is impossible to establish if legal mistakes were made, the court said.’
Are they joking or are they really that sick and sadistic! Complaints are deliberately lacking in transparency and so are SARS and FOI Requests in some cases.
Make a complaint and besides doubling down on the complainant for daring to raise concerns, which can be of a serious, valid nature, the outcomes get minimalised and accurate recordings of the outcome are not even forthcoming to the complainant always where their Complaint has held some success! This means they can be prevented from taking said complaint higher, in a timely manner and it’s even been known that evidence gets destroyed, while the complainant is knowingly still challenging what the problems are.
This is what makes the years go by, met with dead ends, on top because Complaints have not been looked into properly in the first place, when there are things to hide.
Redacted data causes as many problems, because the requester cannot see what is kept hidden away from them, which could be detrimental in helping with their request. Struth! There’s already enough redacted data for some through live secret family court proceedings, especially whenever a Judge has found wrongdoing and criminal activity caused through no other than the perpetrators.
A good tip a friend who requested through FOI Requests once told me, was that he only ever requested the information he already knew the answers to. That way he could establish what was transparent and what was not.
Satisfactory answers are not always been given and I cannot see anything changing, while the ones looking into Complaints are allowed to continue which elements of the Complaint to look into and which elements not to look into.
Same as I read somewhere, a Judge can choose what they write in Judgements and even what to amend. Now if a Judge has found perpetrator/s frauding on a parent’s Case or false diagnosis gets made, it’s been known for the Judge not to reflect this fact in the Judgement/s in the name of accuracy and transparency. If then a further alleged diagnosis is forced by a medical professional on the parent, before closing the Case, why is said alleged, possibly further false diagnosis allowed to be used in hearsay without no mention of it in the Judgement? Is this not fraud too and tampering with evidence in the name of justice? I think not.
Truth is, in England there are Council/s or SW’s still telling parent/s to give their child up now, the child of their picking like cherry picking using the parent/s and worse still all the other siblings as well as the chosen child involved to get to that child like some sort of predator!
But often, not until they’ve first deceived the parent!/s like a cunning venomous deceitful snake, they’ll get their child home!
The SW/’s who take part in this criminal activity, are so confident they’ll have the protection of the secret family court Judge that they just carry on regardless, like it’s some sort of prize before spitting the parent/’s back out!
You see, to them it’s just business as usual, and it’s just typical they do not take the emotions or the aftermath caused to the families into account, when looking into these monstrosities.
There are/have been children affected grow up been severely affected by said such criminal acts who just like the parents have nowhere genuine to turn to for answers or support!
Many get lost to death and suicide along the way, like some sort of cruel, inhumane experiment which has gone wrong. But has enough research not been done already, to prove that forced adoption does not work to bring harmony to the child who was wrongly taken, because I accept some need taking, but not thousands upon thousands I certainly don’t accept it. Not when it’s all done under the guise of secret family court.
It’s outrageous that these kind of inhumane experiments with family’s actual real life lives are allowed to still continue with so many cruel, evil acts been committed against them, breaching their human rights.
I encourage any parents and children in England and Wales to please look at BIC’s in the best interests of the child, new, free family rights booklet as a starting point to help them start understanding what their rights are.
Parent-led by me re the BIC Review which can be found on Researching Reform’s page on Facebook.
Parent’s like me, some are getting to find the evidence of no adoption, even where they were misled their child was forcibly adopted and if all parents were given copies of their child’s full adoption certificate with their newer birth certificate, perhaps they would discover too that their child was not really ever adopted legally or lawfully but instead left to languish in the long term Foster care system and I can state I found the evidence of no adoption since this site is aware of my evidence I do have and any parent’s like me, ought to have really been told the truth we still held/hold PR right up until a child is 18 years old in England, Wales and Ireland (I think Northern Ireland?) and aged 16 in Scotland.
But take said concerns back to secret family court, even with your child affected blessing, said criminal activity just continues because then you get told it won’t be being investigated and that there is no jurisdiction. This is pure madness and you will not even have all your evidence seen by the Judge, but you will get threatened with speaking out naming places and names they want kept hidden!
Is all this really about protecting children or is it about protecting themselves. You won’t get compensation for it for your wronged family either, your just spat out and spat on when raising your genuine concerns.
I’m outraged. This all needs to change. My thoughts are with the families where these not so far back historical happenings took place, but only because the way the system has designed it has made it this way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on tummum's Blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
keith brettwood said:
“Mothers call for apology following historic forced adoptions (Scotland)”
Its very unlikely to happen. they know if they apologize its an admission of wrongdoing and liable cases are bound follow. we must remember that politicians and MPs are usually of middle class backgrounds and very well educated. they can see the future of that scenario before it happens and they dont want it. Hence all the blind eyes.