• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • Guide To Making A Subject Access Request
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Daily Archives: June 16, 2021

Separating families because of poverty is illegal, court rules

16 Wednesday Jun 2021

Posted by Natasha in Researching Reform

≈ Leave a comment

A court in Tbilisi, the capital city of Georgia, has ruled that taking children from parents over poverty is illegal, in a ground-breaking case which has made precedent in the country.

The case involved three children who were removed from their parents by social workers who had failed to try to provide state support for the family beforehand. The children spent two years in state care before they were reunited with their families.

The Tbilisi City Court ordered the Georgian government to pay each child £8,000 for the harm they suffered as a result of the separations.

The court case is the first to use Georgia’s new child rights focused lawsuits.

The process — produced in partnership with the European Council and using the Partnership for Good Governance guidelines — allows children to appeal decisions about them using a child-friendly form. The pioneering form enables children to write down their wishes and feelings, and ask the court for help and for assistance in appointing lawyers.

The court heard directly from the children in the case through the lawsuit they filed, which included details about the errors that were made during their child welfare investigations.

A Facebook post published by the Council of Europe’s Georgia office on June 15, said the court held that the decision was made in the best interests of the children. Lawyers representing the children said the judgment was “a great achievement for the judiciary.”

Growing concerns that children in England and Wales have been unjustly removed from their parents by local authorities simply because the families were experiencing poverty have been voiced by researchers, pioneering social workers and key stakeholders inside the child protection sector in recent years.

A growing body of research has shown that children living in the poorest areas are more likely to be taken into care, with single mothers being a significant at-risk group when it comes to inappropriate child removal.

Further reading:

  • Suffer the little children and their mothers – Legal Action for Women report
  • Poverty, Inequality, Child Abuse and Neglect: Changing theConversation across the UK in Child Protection?
  • Children in poorest areas more likely to enter care
  • Do No Harm – Andy Bilson
The children in the case, outside the court house, following the final hearing.

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,452 other subscribers

Contact Researching Reform

Huff Post Contributer

For Litigants in Person

Child Welfare Debates

June 2021
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« May   Jul »

Children In The Vine : Stories From The Family Justice System

Categories

  • Adoption
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and The Court of Protection
  • Articles
  • Big Data
  • Bills
  • Case Study
  • child abuse
  • child abuse inquiry
  • child welfare
  • Children
  • Children In The Vine
  • Circumcision
  • Civil Partnerships
  • Consultation
  • Conversations With…
  • Corporal Punishment
  • CSA
  • CSE
  • Data Pack
  • Domestic Violence
  • Encyclopaedia on Family and The Law
  • event
  • Family Law
  • Family Law Cases
  • FGM
  • FOI
  • forced adoption
  • Foster Care
  • Fudge of the Week
  • Fultemian Project
  • Huffington Post
  • Human Rights
  • IGM
  • Inquiry
  • Interesting Things
  • Interview
  • Judge of the Week
  • Judges
  • judicial bias
  • Law to lust for
  • legal aid
  • LexisNexis Family Law
  • LIP Service
  • LIPs
  • Marriage
  • McKenzie Friends
  • MGM
  • News
  • Notes
  • petition
  • Picture of the Month
  • Podcast
  • Question It
  • Random Review
  • Real Live Interviews
  • Research
  • Researching Reform
  • social services
  • social work
  • Spotlight
  • Stats
  • Terrorism
  • The Buzz
  • The Times
  • Troubled Families Programme
  • Twitter Conversations
  • Update
  • Voice of the Child
  • Voice of the Child Podcast
  • Westminster Debate
  • Who's Who Cabinet Ministers
  • Your Story

Recommended

  • Blawg Review
  • BlogCatalog
  • DaddyNatal
  • DadsHouse
  • Divorce Survivor
  • Enough Abuse UK
  • Family Law Week
  • Family Lore
  • Flawbord
  • GeekLawyer's Blog
  • Head of Legal
  • Just for Kids Law
  • Kensington Mums
  • Law Diva
  • Legal Aid Barristers
  • Lib Dem Lords
  • Lords of The Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • PAIN
  • Paul Bernal's Blog
  • Public Law Guide
  • Pupillage Blog
  • Real Lawyers Have Blogs
  • Story of Mum
  • Sue Atkins, BBC Parenting Coach
  • The Barrister Blog
  • The Magistrate's Blog
  • The Not So Big Society
  • Tracey McMahon
  • UK Freedom of Information Blog
  • WardBlawg

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 813 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: