• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • Guide To Making A Subject Access Request
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Daily Archives: April 23, 2021

Lords concerned by the ongoing relaxation of children’s social care regulations

23 Friday Apr 2021

Posted by Natasha in Researching Reform

≈ 3 Comments

Fresh concerns about the government’s decision to extend controversial easements allowing local authorities to set aside fundamental rights for children in care during the Coronavirus pandemic, have been raised by members of the House of Lords in a new report.

The report, published on 21 April by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee – a House of Lords Select Committee which assesses the merits of laws and other types of secondary legislation subject to parliamentary procedure – criticised the Department for Education’s decision to extend the easements for a further six months.

“We are concerned about the length of this further extension, especially as children have now returned to school. We consider that a three-month extension may have been more appropriate, given the vulnerability of the children affected and the benefits of face-to-face contact, especially over the summer holidays,” the peers said.

“The House may wish to press the Minister for an assurance that the Department will make every effort to bring to an end the temporary measures and return to regular face-to-face visits and meetings at the earliest opportunity.”

While the majority of the easements in place during the pandemic expired in September 2020, a remaining number of regulations were extended until 31 March 2021, and have now been extended further by the government after allegedly consulting with stakeholders.

The decision to extend the relaxation of important rights for children in care for a further six months, until 30 September, follows a landmark case which found the government had broken the law by failing to consult the Children’s Commissioner and other child welfare bodies before amending rules and regulations which could significantly impact children’s welfare in the sector.

Judges in the Court of Appeal also laid out the reasons for a consultation, which they said was necessary to improve the quality of decision making; to ensure those affected were consulted; and that a consultation was part of a wider democratic process that needed to be followed.

The extended easements, enabled through the Adoption and Children (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Regulations 2021 (SI 2021/261) include;

  • Allowing social workers to make virtual visits to looked after children via video conference, telephone, or any other electronic means;
  • Virtual visits of residential family centres and virtual interviews with residents and staff to form an opinion on the standard of care provided; and
  • Virtual meetings of children and young people in children’s homes with their families, social workers and others.

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,014 other followers

Contact Researching Reform

Huff Post Contributer

For Litigants in Person

Child Welfare Debates

April 2021
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« Mar   May »

Children In The Vine : Stories From The Family Justice System

Categories

  • Adoption
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and The Court of Protection
  • Articles
  • Big Data
  • Bills
  • Case Study
  • child abuse
  • child abuse inquiry
  • child welfare
  • Children
  • Children In The Vine
  • Circumcision
  • Civil Partnerships
  • Consultation
  • Conversations With…
  • Corporal Punishment
  • CSA
  • CSE
  • Data Pack
  • Domestic Violence
  • Encyclopaedia on Family and The Law
  • event
  • Family Law
  • Family Law Cases
  • FGM
  • FOI
  • forced adoption
  • Foster Care
  • Fudge of the Week
  • Fultemian Project
  • Huffington Post
  • Human Rights
  • IGM
  • Inquiry
  • Interesting Things
  • Interview
  • Judge of the Week
  • Judges
  • judicial bias
  • Law to lust for
  • legal aid
  • LexisNexis Family Law
  • LIP Service
  • LIPs
  • Marriage
  • McKenzie Friends
  • MGM
  • News
  • Notes
  • petition
  • Picture of the Month
  • Podcast
  • Question It
  • Random Review
  • Real Live Interviews
  • Research
  • Researching Reform
  • social services
  • social work
  • Spotlight
  • Stats
  • Terrorism
  • The Buzz
  • The Times
  • Troubled Families Programme
  • Twitter Conversations
  • Update
  • Voice of the Child
  • Voice of the Child Podcast
  • Westminster Debate
  • Who's Who Cabinet Ministers
  • Your Story

Recommended

  • Blawg Review
  • BlogCatalog
  • DaddyNatal
  • DadsHouse
  • Divorce Survivor
  • Enough Abuse UK
  • Family Law Week
  • Family Lore
  • Flawbord
  • GeekLawyer's Blog
  • Head of Legal
  • Just for Kids Law
  • Kensington Mums
  • Law Diva
  • Legal Aid Barristers
  • Lib Dem Lords
  • Lords of The Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • PAIN
  • Paul Bernal's Blog
  • Public Law Guide
  • Pupillage Blog
  • Real Lawyers Have Blogs
  • Story of Mum
  • Sue Atkins, BBC Parenting Coach
  • The Barrister Blog
  • The Magistrate's Blog
  • The Not So Big Society
  • Tracey McMahon
  • UK Freedom of Information Blog
  • WardBlawg

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 8,014 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: