• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • Guide To Making A Subject Access Request
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Daily Archives: March 8, 2021

Children’s Commissioner flooded with emails after call to report child welfare concerns

08 Monday Mar 2021

Posted by Natasha in Researching Reform

≈ 3 Comments

The Children’s Commissioner has been inundated with emails days after making a call to get in touch with the Office.

Rachel de Souza, who took up the role of Children’s Commissioner on 1 March, asked members of the public to email or call her if, “you can think of an unmet need for a child you know about”, and added, “If you are a child, and you are thinking about writing to us, don’t hesitate.”

Researching Reform shared de Souza’s invitation in a post published last week and included a link to the contact form on the Children’s Commissioner’s website.

The link in the post for the contact form was accessed several thousand times shortly after the post went live, but within 48 hours a growing number of individuals, many of whom were concerned parents with children in care, had begun to complain that they could no longer submit messages to the Commissioner.

Parents reported seeing a “processing” message appear after clicking “submit”, but no ensuing message to say the email had been sent, or any change in the page to suggest the email had gone through.

The Children’s Commissioner promised to look into the glitch on 5 March, after this site posted a tweet explaining what had happened. Following a tweet on 8 March to ask de Souza for an update, the Commissioner confirmed the issue had been resolved.

However in an apparent change to the contact form, a new notice had been added, which can be seen once an email is sent.

The message says, “Thank you for contacting the Children’s Commissioner for England.”

“While we appreciate you getting in touch, we are unable to respond to all correspondence due to the very high volume of emails we receive and limited staff capacity. We will always respond to emails directly from children.”

“All correspondence is read by a member of the Commissioner’s Policy Team. We will be in touch if we need more information from you.”

The notice poses several problems. Many children will be unable to send emails themselves because they will either be too young, unable to access the internet, or too frightened to reach out.

A significant number of parents with children in care are deeply concerned by the way in which their children are being looked after, and are often the only voice their children have. That is because children in care can be wary of raising concerns about the people who are currently caring for them, or the harm they may be experiencing.

And given that the Children’s Commissioner has little to no experience of the care system, reading all of the emails she receives would be an invaluable introduction into the serious problems inside the child welfare sector. These emails are priceless.

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,070 other followers

Contact Researching Reform

Huff Post Contributer

For Litigants in Person

Child Welfare Debates

March 2021
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Feb   Apr »

Children In The Vine : Stories From The Family Justice System

Categories

  • Adoption
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and The Court of Protection
  • Articles
  • Big Data
  • Bills
  • Case Study
  • child abuse
  • child abuse inquiry
  • child welfare
  • Children
  • Children In The Vine
  • Circumcision
  • Civil Partnerships
  • Consultation
  • Conversations With…
  • Corporal Punishment
  • CSA
  • CSE
  • Data Pack
  • Domestic Violence
  • Encyclopaedia on Family and The Law
  • event
  • Family Law
  • Family Law Cases
  • FGM
  • FOI
  • forced adoption
  • Foster Care
  • Fudge of the Week
  • Fultemian Project
  • Huffington Post
  • Human Rights
  • IGM
  • Inquiry
  • Interesting Things
  • Interview
  • Judge of the Week
  • Judges
  • judicial bias
  • Law to lust for
  • legal aid
  • LexisNexis Family Law
  • LIP Service
  • LIPs
  • Marriage
  • McKenzie Friends
  • MGM
  • News
  • Notes
  • petition
  • Picture of the Month
  • Podcast
  • Question It
  • Random Review
  • Real Live Interviews
  • Research
  • Researching Reform
  • social services
  • social work
  • Spotlight
  • Stats
  • Terrorism
  • The Buzz
  • The Times
  • Troubled Families Programme
  • Twitter Conversations
  • Update
  • Voice of the Child
  • Voice of the Child Podcast
  • Westminster Debate
  • Who's Who Cabinet Ministers
  • Your Story

Recommended

  • Blawg Review
  • BlogCatalog
  • DaddyNatal
  • DadsHouse
  • Divorce Survivor
  • Enough Abuse UK
  • Family Law Week
  • Family Lore
  • Flawbord
  • GeekLawyer's Blog
  • Head of Legal
  • Just for Kids Law
  • Kensington Mums
  • Law Diva
  • Legal Aid Barristers
  • Lib Dem Lords
  • Lords of The Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • PAIN
  • Paul Bernal's Blog
  • Public Law Guide
  • Pupillage Blog
  • Real Lawyers Have Blogs
  • Story of Mum
  • Sue Atkins, BBC Parenting Coach
  • The Barrister Blog
  • The Magistrate's Blog
  • The Not So Big Society
  • Tracey McMahon
  • UK Freedom of Information Blog
  • WardBlawg

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 8,070 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: