• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • Guide To Making A Subject Access Request
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Daily Archives: August 6, 2020

Family Case Tests Children’s Right To Contact With Birth Parents During Lockdown

06 Thursday Aug 2020

Posted by Natasha in Researching Reform

≈ 8 Comments

In what may be the first case of its kind, a decision by a judge to deny a mother’s request for contact with her children while in care during lockdown has been set aside by the Court of Appeal.

The children, aged 7, 3 and 1, had been taken into care and were living with their grandmother temporarily, after the youngest child had sustained a leg injury which was suspected to have been non accidental, while in the care of their mother.

Before lockdown, which began in March, the children had face to face contact with their mother three times a week for two hours. The local authority then decided to shut its contact centres, leading to the family having indirect telephone and video contact.

Two of the children were noted to have found these forms of contact distressing.

When the mother asked for face to face contact to resume, the local authority refused, citing government guidance as the reason, and so the mother made an application to the family court for contact.

The judge dismissed the application during a telephone hearing, which had been enabled during lockdown to allow some cases to be heard, also citing government guidance on the issue.

The mother appealed.

By the time the case was heard in the Court of Appeal, face to face contact for the family had resumed, as lockdown measures had eased during the life of the case, but the mother’s counsel asked the Appeal Court judges to hear the case as it held wider significance for the child protection sector.

The judges agreed to hear the appeal, and took the view that the lower court judge had made several mistakes in his judgment, including not assessing whether the contact offered had been reasonable and not making the children’s best interests the paramount consideration.

The judgment goes on to explain that courts must look at the children’s circumstances, resources available to local authorities and have a proper grasp of current government guidelines.

Researching Reform predicted cases of this nature would be filed during lockdown after the child protection sector expressed wide-spread confusion over what local authorities were required to do while COVID-19 safety measures were in place.

We urge parents to read the guidance, and to be aware of their rights.

You can access the judgment here, which is very much worth a read.

Further information:

  • Are Children In Care Being Denied Access To Their Birth Parents During the COVID-19 Outbreak? (Podcast)
  • Pioneering Research on Contact with Children in Care During the COVID-19 Outbreak
  • Face to Face Contact For Children and Birth Parents Allowed Under Lockdown Regulations

virus-4937553_1920

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,468 other subscribers

Contact Researching Reform

Huff Post Contributer

For Litigants in Person

Child Welfare Debates

August 2020
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Jul   Sep »

Children In The Vine : Stories From The Family Justice System

Categories

  • Adoption
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and The Court of Protection
  • Articles
  • Big Data
  • Bills
  • Case Study
  • child abuse
  • child abuse inquiry
  • child welfare
  • Children
  • Children In The Vine
  • Circumcision
  • Civil Partnerships
  • Consultation
  • Conversations With…
  • Corporal Punishment
  • CSA
  • CSE
  • Data Pack
  • Domestic Violence
  • Encyclopaedia on Family and The Law
  • event
  • Family Law
  • Family Law Cases
  • FGM
  • FOI
  • forced adoption
  • Foster Care
  • Fudge of the Week
  • Fultemian Project
  • Huffington Post
  • Human Rights
  • IGM
  • Inquiry
  • Interesting Things
  • Interview
  • Judge of the Week
  • Judges
  • judicial bias
  • Law to lust for
  • legal aid
  • LexisNexis Family Law
  • LIP Service
  • LIPs
  • Marriage
  • McKenzie Friends
  • MGM
  • News
  • Notes
  • petition
  • Picture of the Month
  • Podcast
  • Question It
  • Random Review
  • Real Live Interviews
  • Research
  • Researching Reform
  • social services
  • social work
  • Spotlight
  • Stats
  • Terrorism
  • The Buzz
  • The Times
  • Troubled Families Programme
  • Twitter Conversations
  • Update
  • Voice of the Child
  • Voice of the Child Podcast
  • Westminster Debate
  • Who's Who Cabinet Ministers
  • Your Story

Recommended

  • Blawg Review
  • BlogCatalog
  • DaddyNatal
  • DadsHouse
  • Divorce Survivor
  • Enough Abuse UK
  • Family Law Week
  • Family Lore
  • Flawbord
  • GeekLawyer's Blog
  • Head of Legal
  • Just for Kids Law
  • Kensington Mums
  • Law Diva
  • Legal Aid Barristers
  • Lib Dem Lords
  • Lords of The Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • PAIN
  • Paul Bernal's Blog
  • Public Law Guide
  • Pupillage Blog
  • Real Lawyers Have Blogs
  • Story of Mum
  • Sue Atkins, BBC Parenting Coach
  • The Barrister Blog
  • The Magistrate's Blog
  • The Not So Big Society
  • Tracey McMahon
  • UK Freedom of Information Blog
  • WardBlawg

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 813 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: