• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Daily Archives: June 17, 2020

Best Practice Replaces “Good Enough” Standard in New Family Court Guidance

17 Wednesday Jun 2020

Posted by Natasha in Family Law, Researching Reform

≈ 1 Comment

A document endorsed by the President of the Family Division calls on child welfare professionals to adopt best practice guidance when considering special guardianship orders.

The guidance comes as the family courts begin to signal a significant shift away from the sector’s “good enough” standard of practice, which has been widely criticised by child welfare experts for being inadequate.

Judge Keehan, who wrote the guidance and who has just been promoted to Family Division Liaison Judge for London, also outlined a sharp increase in new child protection cases which was not in line with national data on the prevalence of child abuse, raising concerns about the motivations behind the increase.

Special guardianship orders (SGOs) allow courts to place children with someone other than their birth parents, when the parents cannot look after them. Most SGOs are made in favour of a family member known to the child.

The document offers information about the Working Group which helped to develop the guidance, the background to SGOs (which is very good) and a best practice guidance (Appendix E) on how to spot cases where SGOs are appropriate and how to process SGOs correctly.

The guide also mentions several other recommendations the Group says must be implemented, including a renewed emphasis on parental contact, better support for Special Guardians and a reduction in the use of supervision orders with special guardianship orders.

Other important areas related to child welfare the Group said it would investigate are mentioned, such as:

  • The increase in short-notice applications being made by local authorities when issuing applications for public law orders;
  • Whether guidance should be given on the appropriate use of s 20 / s 76 accommodation;
  • Whether child welfare proposals contribute to delivering enhanced benefits and outcomes for children and;
  • How children in family court cases can be engaged in the most effective way.

While it’s worth reading the whole document from start to finish (you’ll need a packet of Digestives and 12 tea bags – the guidance is 54 pages long excluding the bumpf), these are the sections we think are must-reads if you don’t have that many Digestives, or tea bags:

Executive Summary (Pages 12-13)

Short and sweet, this summary offers a clear outline of the guidance and the 10 recommendations the Group makes for SGOs.

Best Practice Guidance (Page 14)

We have only been saying this for ten years, but it’s great to see the family courts finally raising the bar and demanding that best practice be the “new normal” within child welfare work. The Guidance makes it clear that best practice must be applied when processing SGOs, and while the sector’s idea of best practice is still nowhere near good enough (for us at Researching Reform at least), it’s a good place to start.

Special Guardianship (Pages 17 – 26)

The first page in this section offers a good reminder that local authorities must always try to place children with relatives or someone known to the child before considering adoption. This is a legal requirement and not a discretionary policy.

This section also explains what a special guardianship order is, how it works and the complications within the current SGO framework which can compromise appropriate placements and disqualify eligible family members through no fault of their own.

And there is some discussion about poor assessments and variations of quality nationwide, as well as a sub-guide on how to ensure assessments meet best practice guidelines.

Options for placement with family and friends (Pages 66- 69)

This appendix outlines all the options available to child welfare professionals to enable SGOs with the child’s relatives or friends. We would encourage birth parents and their extended families to read this section, as it offers vital information on how SGOs can be secured and which options allow parents to retain parental responsibility.

Conclusion (Pages 33 – 34)

Another significant development is mentioned in the Conclusion by way of a recommendation, which says that where a child has little to no previous connection with a proposed special guardian, the child may live with the guardian on an interim basis before an SGO is made, if that is in the child’s best interests.

The guidance also recommends that the child’s plan should include clear provisions for the time he or she will spend with his or her parent(s) or former carers and the planning of and support for the contact arrangements.

You can read the message from the President of the Family Division and access the Guidance here.

Further reading

Section 20: Councils Bypassing Parents, Targeting Children To Secure Agreements

Children’s Right To Speak To Judges In Family Cases Shelved Because Of Cost – Former Family Court President 

Screenshot 2020-06-17 at 16.23.58

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 7,954 other followers

Contact Researching Reform

Huff Post Contributer

For Litigants in Person

Child Welfare Debates

June 2020
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« May   Jul »

Children In The Vine : Stories From The Family Justice System

Categories

  • Adoption
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and The Court of Protection
  • Articles
  • Big Data
  • Bills
  • Case Study
  • child abuse
  • child abuse inquiry
  • child welfare
  • Children
  • Children In The Vine
  • Circumcision
  • Civil Partnerships
  • Consultation
  • Conversations With…
  • Corporal Punishment
  • CSA
  • CSE
  • Data Pack
  • Domestic Violence
  • Encyclopaedia on Family and The Law
  • event
  • Family Law
  • Family Law Cases
  • FGM
  • FOI
  • forced adoption
  • Foster Care
  • Fudge of the Week
  • Fultemian Project
  • Huffington Post
  • Human Rights
  • IGM
  • Inquiry
  • Interesting Things
  • Interview
  • Judge of the Week
  • Judges
  • judicial bias
  • Law to lust for
  • legal aid
  • LexisNexis Family Law
  • LIP Service
  • LIPs
  • Marriage
  • McKenzie Friends
  • MGM
  • News
  • Notes
  • petition
  • Picture of the Month
  • Podcast
  • Question It
  • Random Review
  • Real Live Interviews
  • Research
  • Researching Reform
  • social services
  • social work
  • Spotlight
  • Stats
  • Terrorism
  • The Buzz
  • The Times
  • Troubled Families Programme
  • Twitter Conversations
  • Update
  • Voice of the Child
  • Voice of the Child Podcast
  • Westminster Debate
  • Who's Who Cabinet Ministers
  • Your Story

Recommended

  • Blawg Review
  • BlogCatalog
  • DaddyNatal
  • DadsHouse
  • Divorce Survivor
  • Enough Abuse UK
  • Family Law Week
  • Family Lore
  • Flawbord
  • GeekLawyer's Blog
  • Head of Legal
  • Just for Kids Law
  • Kensington Mums
  • Law Diva
  • Legal Aid Barristers
  • Lib Dem Lords
  • Lords of The Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • PAIN
  • Paul Bernal's Blog
  • Public Law Guide
  • Pupillage Blog
  • Real Lawyers Have Blogs
  • Story of Mum
  • Sue Atkins, BBC Parenting Coach
  • The Barrister Blog
  • The Magistrate's Blog
  • The Not So Big Society
  • Tracey McMahon
  • UK Freedom of Information Blog
  • WardBlawg

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 7,954 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
    %d bloggers like this: