• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • Guide To Making A Subject Access Request
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Daily Archives: May 28, 2020

New York Raises Legal Threshold For Child Abuse

28 Thursday May 2020

Posted by Natasha in child abuse, child welfare, Researching Reform

≈ 1 Comment

Legislation has been passed in New York which raises the bar for entries into the state’s Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment (SCR). The amendment makes it harder for social services to place parents on the register without sufficient evidence.

The amendment, which was placed inside New York’s 2020 budget bill, raises the legal threshold for determining that someone maltreated a child, reduces the length of time before records of neglect are sealed, and provides additional protections for accused parents before employers can access their records.

The legislation has been called the most significant reform of New York’s child welfare laws in over a decade, and includes four key amendments:

  1. Raising the standard of evidence required to indicate a case in the SCR from “some credible evidence” to “a fair preponderance of evidence”;
  2. Parents will no longer be required to file a claim to clear their records once family courts dismiss allegations;
  3. Parents challenging their records now have the opportunity to show that the allegations are not relevant to working with children and;
  4. Neglect records will be automatically sealed after eight years.

The register has been widely criticised by reformers in New York for failing to differentiate between different kinds of abuse. Campaigners also say that while it is very easy to be placed on the register, it is notoriously difficult to be removed from the record, even when a child is no longer at risk.

Another criticism levelled at the register by legal advocates and child welfare organisations is that it does not distinguish between charges of abuse and of neglect, and ignores underlying causes of involuntary neglect (an inability to provide basic care to a child through no fault of the parents).

Many of the neglect charges currently cited on the register relate to poverty, such as inadequate housing or leaving children unattended when no childcare options were available.

Chris Gottlieb, co-director of the Family Defense Clinic at the NYU School of Law, says the state has a low burden of proof in these kinds of cases, which makes it much easier for parents to find themselves on the register.

As a result of this low threshold, at least 47,000 people are placed on the register each year. According to Gottlieb, the vast majority of these cases involve allegations of neglect, most of which are poverty related.

And less than 14% percent of cases involve abuse allegations. Gottlieb also notes extreme racial disproportionality in who is placed on the register, with black parents 2.6 times more likely to have an indicated report than white parents.

The new legislation asks the state to seal the records of parents accused of neglect (not abuse) after eight years. Currently, parents with records in the register are barred from working in a variety of sectors, including daycare.

A push inside the state to place parents in employment could be the driving force behind the bill.

Widely supported by child welfare bodies and child care agencies inside the state, the register’s heightened threshold will allow more people into work, boosting the state’s production and relieving it of costly financial burdens associated with supporting vulnerable families.

The concern that the amendment could see abused children fall through the new threshold, and allow inappropriate individuals to work in child welfare roles has been raised by opponents of the new legislation.

This site welcomes the increased threshold but remains concerned as to how social services inside New York will be ensuring that voluntary neglect and involuntary neglect cases are separated.

The amendments are due to come into force on January 1, 2022.

girl-3422711_1920

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,468 other subscribers

Contact Researching Reform

Huff Post Contributer

For Litigants in Person

Child Welfare Debates

May 2020
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr   Jun »

Children In The Vine : Stories From The Family Justice System

Categories

  • Adoption
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and The Court of Protection
  • Articles
  • Big Data
  • Bills
  • Case Study
  • child abuse
  • child abuse inquiry
  • child welfare
  • Children
  • Children In The Vine
  • Circumcision
  • Civil Partnerships
  • Consultation
  • Conversations With…
  • Corporal Punishment
  • CSA
  • CSE
  • Data Pack
  • Domestic Violence
  • Encyclopaedia on Family and The Law
  • event
  • Family Law
  • Family Law Cases
  • FGM
  • FOI
  • forced adoption
  • Foster Care
  • Fudge of the Week
  • Fultemian Project
  • Huffington Post
  • Human Rights
  • IGM
  • Inquiry
  • Interesting Things
  • Interview
  • Judge of the Week
  • Judges
  • judicial bias
  • Law to lust for
  • legal aid
  • LexisNexis Family Law
  • LIP Service
  • LIPs
  • Marriage
  • McKenzie Friends
  • MGM
  • News
  • Notes
  • petition
  • Picture of the Month
  • Podcast
  • Question It
  • Random Review
  • Real Live Interviews
  • Research
  • Researching Reform
  • social services
  • social work
  • Spotlight
  • Stats
  • Terrorism
  • The Buzz
  • The Times
  • Troubled Families Programme
  • Twitter Conversations
  • Update
  • Voice of the Child
  • Voice of the Child Podcast
  • Westminster Debate
  • Who's Who Cabinet Ministers
  • Your Story

Recommended

  • Blawg Review
  • BlogCatalog
  • DaddyNatal
  • DadsHouse
  • Divorce Survivor
  • Enough Abuse UK
  • Family Law Week
  • Family Lore
  • Flawbord
  • GeekLawyer's Blog
  • Head of Legal
  • Just for Kids Law
  • Kensington Mums
  • Law Diva
  • Legal Aid Barristers
  • Lib Dem Lords
  • Lords of The Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • PAIN
  • Paul Bernal's Blog
  • Public Law Guide
  • Pupillage Blog
  • Real Lawyers Have Blogs
  • Story of Mum
  • Sue Atkins, BBC Parenting Coach
  • The Barrister Blog
  • The Magistrate's Blog
  • The Not So Big Society
  • Tracey McMahon
  • UK Freedom of Information Blog
  • WardBlawg

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 813 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: