• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • Guide To Making A Subject Access Request
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Monthly Archives: April 2020

Practice Makes Profit – Voice of the Child Podcast

30 Thursday Apr 2020

Posted by Natasha in Researching Reform, Voice of the Child Podcast

≈ Leave a comment

In the last episode for our storytelling series, Paula finds a way to challenge an interim care order and get her baby home, but will she manage to bypass the tactics inside the system and win her son back?

We will be back next week with interviews and more on the Voice of the Child.

Listen to this episode here. 

Screenshot 2020-04-30 at 20.41.56

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Buzz

29 Wednesday Apr 2020

Posted by Natasha in Researching Reform, The Buzz

≈ Leave a comment

The latest child welfare items that should be right on your radar:

  • At least 12 children taken to intensive care in UK with new syndrome
  • Further support for children affected by domestic abuse 
  • Chief Executive of WillisPalmer: “Never has there been a greater need to eradicate domestic abuse”

Buzz

 

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Care Homes Must Tell Birth Families When Children Fall Ill During The Coronavirus Outbreak

28 Tuesday Apr 2020

Posted by Natasha in child welfare, Researching Reform

≈ 2 Comments

The birth parents of children in residential care homes must be told when their child falls ill during the Coronavirus outbreak, and must also be consulted about how they should be looked after, a House of Commons briefing paper has confirmed.

The paper, which has been published by the House of Commons library, offers answers to frequently asked questions about child contact in relation to both private (divorce) and public family law (child protection) orders.

The document goes on to explain that managers of residential care settings should speak to parents and carers about their views on whether the child should return home if he or she needs to self isolate. This is what the paper says:

“Concerning situations where a child in residential care needs to self-isolate, guidance states that managers of such settings should speak to parents to establish what should happen:

Managers of residential settings should speak to parents and carers to establish views on whether the child or young person should return home for any period of self-isolation (due to them, or someone else in the same setting, displaying symptoms) or should remain at their setting. They should do this pre-emptively, rather than waiting until someone shows symptoms. Where possible, the risk assessment should also include consideration of the impact on the pupil or student from the disruption of their usual staff relationships and routines.”

The briefing paper also offers information on active legislation and policy that must be followed by councils with regards to contact.

A section entitled “Can I visit my child in care/residential home (England)?” explains:

“Under section 34 of the Children Act 1989, where a child is in local authority care, the local authority must allow “reasonable contact” between a child and their parents, guardian, any person with parental responsibility or a named person who had previous care of the child. However, this can be halted for seven days if the local authority believes it necessary to safeguard or promote the child’s welfare; the refusal is decided upon as a matter of urgency.

UK Government guidance for local authorities on children’s social care states that the Government “recognise[s] that the challenging context means that local authorities and partners will struggle to meet the full range of statutory duties relating to child protection, safeguarding and care at present”.

The guidance states that the Government expects contact between children in care and their relatives to continue and for the spirit of contact orders to be met:

We expect that contact between children in care and their birth relatives will continue.

It is essential for children and families to remain in touch at this difficult time, and for some children, the consequences of not seeing relatives would be traumatising. Contact arrangements should therefore be assessed on a case by case basis taking into account a range of factors including the government’s social distancing guidance and the needs of the child.

It may not be possible, or appropriate, for the usual face-to-face contact to happen at this time and keeping in touch will, for the most part, need to take place virtually. We expect the spirit of any contact orders made in relation to children in care to be maintained and will look to social workers to determine how best to support those valuable family interactions based on the circumstances of each case.

Regulation 11 of The Adoption and Children (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 amends the Children’s Home Regulations 2015.

It states there must be suitable facilities within a children’s home for any child accommodated there to meet persons including parents, friends, relatives and their assigned social worker, or, where this is not possible, for communication over the telephone, video-link or other electronic communication method.

The paper also has a section entitled, “My child contact centre is closed: What alternatives are being made (UK)?” 

Crucially, this section confirms that some contact centres have remained open.

The section says:

In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, Child Contact Centres are run by a variety of independent organisations that form the National Association of Child Contact Centres (NACCC). They deal with:

• private law cases, where there is an agreement or court order made for supervised contact, and
• public law cases, where a child is in the care of the local authority and a contact order has been made with respect to the child for supervised contact.

The NACCC is maintaining a webpage on Covid-19. The guidance from them is that people should not be attending Child Contact Centres.

Some Centres are exploring ways to ensure child contact can continue to take place:

1. Centres are working creatively with families to see if there are other
people that might be able to take up the role of the contact centre. This works
well where there are family members or other trusted people that can step in,
to support. The government has detailed that children can travel to see parents
and the judiciary are urging parents to work together in making decisions for
children where this is safe and appropriate.

2. Indirect Contact is being achieved using technology like Skype, WhatsApp
video calling, Face Time and so on. Some centres are finding ways to support
this so that similar arrangements can be implemented in line with the services
usually being offered.

3. Other centres are reducing service sizes and availability. This means
that whilst the centre may have suspended contact, it might be possible for them to offer handovers for those parents who just cannot organise this without the centre.

The NACCC states that impacted members of the public should contact NACCC directly or a local contact centre to find out what services are available. Contact details for local centres may be found here: https://naccc.org.uk/find-a-centre.

In Northern Ireland, the Lord Chief Justice’s Office has said parties should contact their legal respective as all Contact Centres have been closed. In Scotland, parties should contact their local Contact Centre.

The Briefing Paper can be accessed here.

Screenshot 2020-04-28 at 09.44.25

 

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Domestic Abuse: Legal Aid Requirements Relaxed, Bill Second Reading

28 Tuesday Apr 2020

Posted by Natasha in Domestic Violence, Researching Reform

≈ 1 Comment

The Civil Legal Aid (Procedure) (Amendment) Regulations 2020, which extends the types of evidence that can be used by domestic abuse victims, or those at risk of abuse, to apply for legal aid, comes into force on 15th May.

The Regulations also action the following:

  • The removal of the mandatory requirement to contact the Civil Legal Aid (CLA)
    Telephone Gateway for those seeking legal aid in discrimination, debt and special
    educational needs matters, reinstating immediate access to face-to-face advice in
    these cases;
  • The introduction of a discretion for the Director of Legal Aid Casework (DLAC)
    to determine legal help funding, in relation to inquests, earlier than the date of
    determination and;
  • The removal of the mandatory requirement that an applicant for legal aid for
    Family Mediation must always attend the mediator’s premises in order to make
    their application for legal aid.

This Explanatory Memorandum offers more information on the amendments, and you can access Regulation 33 here, which outlines the supporting documents allowed in domestic abuse applications for legal aid (click on the Latest Available tab for changes already made – some changes may still be outstanding).

And the Domestic Abuse Bill has its second reading today in the House of Commons.

The legislation hopes to create:

  • The first ever statutory government definition of domestic abuse
  • A Domestic Abuse Commissioner to support victims and survivors
  • New Domestic Abuse Protection Notices and Domestic Abuse Protection Orders to further protect victims and restrict offenders’ actions
  • A ban on the cross-examination of victims by their abusers and alleged abusers in the family courts
  • An automatic eligibility for special measures to support more victims to give evidence in the criminal courts

You can access a briefing on the Bill from the House of Commons library here.

Screenshot 2020-04-27 at 15.57.48

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Question It!

27 Monday Apr 2020

Posted by Natasha in Question It, Researching Reform

≈ 6 Comments

Welcome to another week.

The family courts in England and Wales use the civil courts’ “balance of probability” standard when it comes to assessing evidence in family cases.

In criminal courts, the standard implemented when trying to decide whether something did or didn’t happen based on the evidence in court, is “beyond reasonable doubt“.

Our question this week, which has been placed inside a poll on Twitter, reads:

Should the family courts stop using the “balance of probability” test when examining evidence in child welfare cases, and use the “beyond reasonable doubt” test instead?

Yes, No, or do you think the test should be something entirely different?

Let us know what you think over on twitter, or in the comments section below. Our poll on Twitter runs for 7 days.

Many thanks to Dana for sharing an article on this subject.

Screenshot 2020-04-27 at 09.41.15

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Practice Makes Profit – The Voice of the Child Podcast

24 Friday Apr 2020

Posted by Natasha in Researching Reform, Voice of the Child Podcast

≈ 2 Comments

Based on real-life cases, the Voice of the Child presents fictionalised stories offering a glimpse into the UK’s child protection system.

In the first episode of “Practice Makes Profit”, a woman has her baby taken from her as soon as he is born, and tries to find out on what grounds social services have removed her newborn from her care.

Visiting the consultant whose report led to her baby being taken from her, the mother becomes suspicious that the removal process is fuelled by greed, and malpractice.

The surreal ending to this episode is not a fictional flourish.

WARNING: This podcast contains some explicit language.

You can listen to the first instalment of this story here. 

Screenshot 2020-04-24 at 19.08.54

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Buzz

23 Thursday Apr 2020

Posted by Natasha in Researching Reform, The Buzz

≈ 1 Comment

The child welfare items that should be right on your radar:

  • The Adoption and Children (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Regulations 2020– Come into force on 24 April, 2020
  • Adoption and Children (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 – Explanatory Memorandum
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19): support for victims of sexual violence and abuse
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19) action plan – what the UK health and social care system has done to tackle the outbreak, and what it plans to do next. (March 2020)
  • New children and education complaint decisions from the Ombudsman
  • Consultation on remote hearings in the Family Court – Repost/ reminder as the consultation ends on 28th April

Buzz

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Ignored By The Government, Children in Care Homes Are Catching COVID-19

22 Wednesday Apr 2020

Posted by Natasha in child welfare, Researching Reform

≈ 6 Comments

Vulnerable children in care are catching the novel coronavirus, with at least one residential home reporting all of its children falling ill, and several staff in other homes going into self-isolation.

Fears over children’s care homes in Britain harbouring some of the worst cases of communal infection have been sparked, after a report shared with this site outlined a number of cases in several care homes where children and staff appear to have contracted the virus.

The report, which was published on Monday by the Independent Children’s Homes Association (ICHA), includes information circulated to 400 care homes.

One care home, which could not be contacted for further information, confirmed in the report that all twelve of its children had become ill. At least two homes said two of their carers had tested positive for COVID-19, with three members of staff requiring hospital admission. Other care home managers said they had isolated staff with “quite severe symptoms”.

It is likely that the current ICHA report outlining COVID-19 outbreaks within these settings are conservative, with many more children infected with the virus. The report also only incorporates voluntary contributions from independent care homes, and does not include updates from care homes run by local authorities in England and Wales.

The Department of Education and the Department of Health and Social Care’s hands-off approach towards children in care during the outbreak may partially be down to ongoing myths about how the novel Coronavirus affects children.

Once thought to be largely immune from the disease, new research is confirming the worst – that children can catch the virus, and die from the infection. Newborns, and children with underlying health conditions, many of whom are represented within the care system, are especially at risk, making it more important than ever for the government to act urgently.

While the government has focused its attention on care homes looking after the elderly during the pandemic, it has routinely ignored children in residential settings, who are by definition also vulnerable.

Edward Nixon, the founder of Every Child Leaving Care Matters, said, “I’m pleased Matt Hancock is looking at issues within care homes, but it seems that his comments do not apply to children’s home settings and are exclusive to the Older People sector, which is partly understandable but he misses the point about many children who are ‘in care’ and vulnerable because of serious physical health conditions, others who are vulnerable due to acute mental health challenges, and who will really struggle in terms of their emotional well-being in the current lockdown.”

A significant number of children in care homes have health conditions which make them susceptible to infection. As many as 62% of children in residential care homes live with a serious mental health condition which could be aggravated by the outbreak, and a lack of government guidance to ensure that the spread of the virus in these homes is stopped.

Staff are required to notify the placing authority of any children infected with the virus, but it is not clear whether care homes are doing so. Birth parents who have court ordered contact in place or who continue to retain parental responsibility have been kept in the dark about their children’s health during the outbreak.

The Office for National Statistics does not carry information about the number of children’s care homes affected by COVID-19 as standalone data.

As the child protection sector continues to operate during the outbreak, new children who could potentially be infected with the disease are being introduced into care homes, increasing the risk of further and recurring infections among children and staff.

While some care homes are isolating newly admitted children for 7-14 days, not all care homes are employing this strategy, leaving children open to infection, and staff confused about what needs to be done to protect children in these homes. Some staff also raised concerns in the report that their homes had not been inspected in over two years.

Elizabeth Cooper, the deputy CEO of the ICHA said that although Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) could provide a barrier to infection in care homes, it posed other problems:

“Children need physical contact and affection. Looked after children have as great, if not more of a need for this to help them heal. They already often feel alienated and ‘different’ and adding a physical barrier to this contact compounds this.”

Mandatory testing for the virus could be a way forward, but while it has been made available to front line workers looking after children in care, vulnerable children are still not eligible for these tests, making it impossible to know the full extent of infection spread within children’s homes.

The testing kits too, are problematic. A booking form produced by Wakefield NHS for health and social care staff requesting a test seen by this site, highlights concerns about the accuracy of the kits.

The test used in their programme is called PCR, which NHS Wakefield says has a high number of false negative results, and that, “Research studies have suggested that false negatives may be as high as 30% in ‘real world’ testing situations.”

The form goes on to explain that, “Out of 10 people who have COVID-19, seven will test positive for the virus but three will test as negative when they are actually positive.”

NHS Wakefield outline the local public health advice for these tests, which it says requires a key worker with COVID-19 symptoms to isolate for the full 7 days before returning to work, even if the PCR test result is negative.

The guidance then tells organisations to use their discretion as to whether or not to follow the advice.

For vulnerable children in care and at-risk adult carers, the test’s 30% failure rate, a lack of compulsory COVID-related duties on councils and care homes, and incomplete government guidance on how to support children in care during the outbreak could be fatal.

Ms Cooper said she would welcome detailed guidance from the government;

“There are guidelines for care homes that don’t really apply to our sector, but are all we have. Clarity from the government and the Department for Education would make a positive difference.” 

coronavirus-4937226_1920

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

In The News

21 Tuesday Apr 2020

Posted by Natasha in News, Researching Reform

≈ Leave a comment

The latest child welfare items that should be right on your radar:

  • COURTS: Summary of family business 
  • Child Welfare’s Response to COVID-19 Is Sickening (US)
  • Wrexham Council to start providing cash to families of children on free school meals

boy-reading-newspaper-new-001

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Question It!

20 Monday Apr 2020

Posted by Natasha in Question It, Researching Reform

≈ 3 Comments

Welcome to another week.

As the government tries to address the challenges faced by parents and professionals in the family courts during the Coronavirus outbreak, families are highlighting ongoing problems with applications for urgent hearings and contact with their children.

Our question this week then, is just this: what challenges are you currently facing?

face_question_mark

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,468 other subscribers

Contact Researching Reform

Huff Post Contributer

For Litigants in Person

Child Welfare Debates

April 2020
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar   May »

Children In The Vine : Stories From The Family Justice System

Categories

  • Adoption
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and The Court of Protection
  • Articles
  • Big Data
  • Bills
  • Case Study
  • child abuse
  • child abuse inquiry
  • child welfare
  • Children
  • Children In The Vine
  • Circumcision
  • Civil Partnerships
  • Consultation
  • Conversations With…
  • Corporal Punishment
  • CSA
  • CSE
  • Data Pack
  • Domestic Violence
  • Encyclopaedia on Family and The Law
  • event
  • Family Law
  • Family Law Cases
  • FGM
  • FOI
  • forced adoption
  • Foster Care
  • Fudge of the Week
  • Fultemian Project
  • Huffington Post
  • Human Rights
  • IGM
  • Inquiry
  • Interesting Things
  • Interview
  • Judge of the Week
  • Judges
  • judicial bias
  • Law to lust for
  • legal aid
  • LexisNexis Family Law
  • LIP Service
  • LIPs
  • Marriage
  • McKenzie Friends
  • MGM
  • News
  • Notes
  • petition
  • Picture of the Month
  • Podcast
  • Question It
  • Random Review
  • Real Live Interviews
  • Research
  • Researching Reform
  • social services
  • social work
  • Spotlight
  • Stats
  • Terrorism
  • The Buzz
  • The Times
  • Troubled Families Programme
  • Twitter Conversations
  • Update
  • Voice of the Child
  • Voice of the Child Podcast
  • Westminster Debate
  • Who's Who Cabinet Ministers
  • Your Story

Recommended

  • Blawg Review
  • BlogCatalog
  • DaddyNatal
  • DadsHouse
  • Divorce Survivor
  • Enough Abuse UK
  • Family Law Week
  • Family Lore
  • Flawbord
  • GeekLawyer's Blog
  • Head of Legal
  • Just for Kids Law
  • Kensington Mums
  • Law Diva
  • Legal Aid Barristers
  • Lib Dem Lords
  • Lords of The Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • PAIN
  • Paul Bernal's Blog
  • Public Law Guide
  • Pupillage Blog
  • Real Lawyers Have Blogs
  • Story of Mum
  • Sue Atkins, BBC Parenting Coach
  • The Barrister Blog
  • The Magistrate's Blog
  • The Not So Big Society
  • Tracey McMahon
  • UK Freedom of Information Blog
  • WardBlawg

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 813 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: