UN Special Rapporteur on the sale and sexual exploitation of children, Maud de Boer-Buquicchio, has called for an inquiry into forced and illegal adoptions in Ireland, after a report she produced raised serious concerns around the sale and exploitation of children inside the country.
There is a very good summary of this development over on The Irish Examiner, but here are a few key thoughts from Boer-Buquicchio about why this inquiry is so important and what it should focus on:
- Her report highlighted failures to provide information, accountability and redress to survivors of institutional abuse, and to individuals adopted in a manner that would amount to the “sale of children under international law”;
- Commercial ties to forced and illegal adoptions were also highlighted;
- The UN Rapporteur said the inquiry should focus on illegal activity around forced adoptions
- Rather than focusing on individual institutions, she would like the State to focus on investigating “the gamut of human rights abuses identified in these and similar settings”
A Twitter survey carried out by this site in May found that 86% of those polled also wanted to see a full scale inquiry into adoption practices in England and Wales.
- Ireland: UN human rights expert calls for national strategy to protect children from sexual violence
- UN Page on Ireland which includes Child Welfare Reports
- Politicians Call For State Inquiry Into Forced and Illegal Adoptions
- Adoption Agency Caught Illegally Registering Births Goes Into Voluntary Liquidation
Is it just me who sees a correlation between slavery, the sale of humans, & forced adoption, the sale of humans?
No Dana you’re not the only one, wow!, I was discussing this point with a family members a few days ago. This is modern day slavery, and it’s modern day slavery because people are not being physically beaten into submission like they were previously, but instead emotionally and psychologically beaten into submission. It’s also shocking how many don’t even realize that this is what is actually taking place.
Something is going to to give one day for this to stop, because I the pressure from what is being done to families, like a pressure cooker, is building up, and building up, and one day it will explode.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Excuse my mistakes 🙂
No Dana you’re not the only one, wow!, I was discussing this point with a family members a few days ago. This is modern day slavery, and it’s modern day slavery because people are not being physically beaten into submission like they were previously, but instead emotionally and psychologically beaten into submission. It’s also shocking how many don’t even realize, that this is what is actually taking place.
Something is going to have to give one day for this to stop, because the pressure from what is being done to families, like a pressure cooker, is building up, and building up, and one day it will explode.
LikeLiked by 1 person
JUDICIAL IMPUNITY/LEGAL SYSTEM ABUSE
Book/amazon: Judicial Criminals The greatest fraud upon American society America’s Legal System
SEEKING WHISTLEBLOWER LAW FIRM /LAW CLINIC/HUMAN RIGHT DEFENDER
What bothers me is why those professionals in the system think that Forced Adoption is ok? Why do they think they have the right to remove a child from the birth family & give it to a stranger?
Who originally instigated it, for what reason? Why has it become so prevalent? Is it ever reviewed to assess if what they are doing is morally right? Is there an alternative? We know that the law states Forced Adoption is the last resort but it’s often the first choice so why are Judges allowing it to continue?
Why are certain counties more likely to take children into care? Why is Forced Adoption more prevalent in certain areas? Why is Forced Adoption generally for the under fives? I suspect it’s because childless adopters want them young to & nothing to do with what is best for the child who has no say in his or her future.
I believe Forced Adoption is fundamentally wrong for all sorts of reasons. I believe it’s morally wrong? Current research negates any long term benefit to a child either being taken into care or forcibly adopted. That research is progressing at a pace the law & social services cannot keep up with so they continue with familiar outdated practices, regardless of the harm they ultimately cause to the child because they fail to adapt to the needs of the child. There’s the irony.
LikeLiked by 3 people
The same should be happening for England, Wales and also Scotland.
I’m from England and a prime example why this should also be happening elsewhere. My childrens and my article 8 CA 1989 human rights have been affected, something which (including article 6 human rights to a fair trial) re ECHR I recall being mentioned in the Reserved Judgement (one prior to Approved Judgement) if things were to move to adoption now.
By the time the Approved Judgement was done with decisions for adoption (forced) being made I’d already had a Solicitor from Birmingham (Aston Carters) inform me there had been plenty of human rights breaches and I was advised to sue. I’d already been told by her that things went really wrong before or about the time adoption decisions got made when she read towards the end of one of my Judgements.
I have 2 copies of the full length newer Birth Certificate for my son stating ‘Adopted’ on those, except how can that be other than them being forged? Re: Fraud. The general registry office have NO record of my son being adopted on official record yet I still got sent those regardless and I have copies of 2 Adoption Certificates too- fact. Both show different surnames re: an alleged mistake with an alleged Adoption Order.
I’ve been deceived or misled by Family Court sending me a section 17 CA1989 Court Order ‘instead’ of the Adoption Order I requested with a Compliment slip, handwritten, stating it’s the Adoption Order when in fact it’s a notice showing only ‘intention’ to adopt.
I’ve had the GRO advise me to get my answers from Family Court, long story short (and years later) I’m restricted mentioning certain names and places when I checked the authenticity of said alleged adoption I’m not allowed to know basically, because the Judge feels satisfied an Adoption took place even though I have the evidence proving otherwise re: serious procedural errors, including being refunded for the 1 certificate they could find no record of because as far as they were concerned there is no trace of Adoption on the entire England and Wales Adoption register, plus Family Court apparently has no Jurisdiction to investigate (post adoption) or post alleged Adoption should I say which just seems bizarre given it don’t appear there really ever was one. No trace of Adoption means there should be none of these newer certificates then.
I had a Court Clerk inform me re: a mistake with my son’s surname when I questioned why he was using a different surname to the one I saw named on his first alleged Adoption Certificate and no one had told me prior, considering it still appeared I did have PR!
I learnt more recently from my son’s alleged Adoptive parent, that she had problems getting my son’s Passport done because of all this so had to get the surname changed/corrected via deed poll instead. She wouldn’t or shouldn’t have needed to do that, if it was just a case of my son’s surname being corrected on written record re: the alleged Adoption Order.
I’d had Letterbox inform me my son’s surname had changed when it had not. I had SS stop my face to face contact in Contempt of Court before the alleged Adoption even allegedly had taken place and one Judge Court Ordered them to hold a meeting to bring me up to do date where it was acknowledged in writing I still had PR despite Adoption decisions already been made by Family Court (this is the same for all natural parents) and the Council had 2 years on written record 4 years for this alleged Adoption (forced) where its since been acknowledged this has been corrected (I’ve not been sent any new entry to show me this though)
I’ve had the Council refer to me all these years as though my son had been Adopted with opportunity to tell me re: the surname problem when I applied for Post Adoption face to face/better level on Contact when my son was in his teens which I did so for him in his best interests when he’d actively tried finding his natural family through social media which got denied at Court despite me having the evidence I could provide properly since but nothing got done to correct that, even though I had a favourable Court Order leaving doors open for next time my son looked.
So please don’t just take any of the above’s word for it with your own Cases. In fact, please don’t take their written evidence as gospel either. I have seen they will do anything to try and cover up, run and hide, leave jobs and I got sent a copy of my son’s Birth Certificate (original one) a year before any Adoption decision was ever even made (premeditated) when he could have been coming home like the Judge was apparently looking at and I had the SW mislead me saying she’d needed to ‘borrow’ my son’s Birth Certificate too yet another lie.
Is it any wonder that my son who is now home is speaking about changing his name back to his family’s, today.
Thank you Xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank God you got your son back Tum Tum ❤️. It’s so heart warming, and wonderful that your son wants to change his name back to his original God given name, that you gave him, it’s so refreshing to hear this. You must have a wonderful son you must be so proud of him. God bless you.
Thank you and yes I am ❤😘 Xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lisa Ann Joseph said:
Yes we need to stop social services teams in every area of England and Wales and Scotland and Ireland and other areas the government is just about the brexit and it should be about the social services and the terrorist attacks and what they Are going to do about it all I can say is Close THE Borders and stop the immigration process of taking up suicide Bombers and terrorism people who are nogooders in our country who kill our friends family and loved ones
Good points Lisa, you have just sparked a thought, within my thoughts. I sincerely believe that SW’s who, especially those who consistently, commit such horrific acts against families, and completely destroy them, should be listed officially as terrorists, under the terrorism act, because that’s exactly how they behave, some might disagree with that view, but I think SW’s who behave in this manner are well worthy, and deserving of being known as a terrorist, under the terrorism act. what does everybody else think?, I’d like to know out of curiosity, thank you.
Good points Lisa, you have just sparked a thought, within my thoughts. I sincerely believe that SW’s, who especially those who consistently commit such horrific acts against families, and completely destroy them, should be listed officially as terrorists, under the terrorism act, because that’s exactly how they behave, some might disagree with that view, but I think SW’s who behave in this manner are well worthy, and deserving of being known as a terrorist, under the terrorism act. what does everybody else think?, I’d like to know out of curiosity, thank you.