• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • Guide To Making A Subject Access Request
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Daily Archives: October 30, 2019

Family Court President Warns Journalists Against ‘Unreasonable Stances’ in Latest Guidelines

30 Wednesday Oct 2019

Posted by Natasha in Family Law, Family Law Cases, Researching Reform

≈ 7 Comments

The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane has said that journalists may be asked to pay court costs if their reporting of a case amounts to an “unreasonable stance,” in the latest guidelines on family court reporting.

The guidance does not clarify what might constitute unreasonable reporting.

However, McFarlane also told courts that they should support journalists wishing to report on family law cases.

The guidelines offer a summary of the law around reporting family law cases and explain that permission to attend a family court hearing does not give the attending journalist an automatic right to report on the case. The guidance goes on to outline how journalists can apply for permission to lift the reporting restrictions.

In the guidance, McFarlane says, “Courts should be astute to assist reporters seeking to attend a hearing, or to relax reporting restrictions, and should provide them with relevant contact details of the court office, the judge’s clerk and the parties where requested.”

If the court and the parties to a case cannot agree on whether to allow a journalist to report on a case, the journalist will then have the right to make oral submissions in court. Attending advocates will be required to assist the reporter with the relevant law and procedure that needs to be followed.

Courts deciding on an application to report will still have to carry out the balancing exercise between privacy and transparency, prioritising the best interests of children involved in these cases.

On the point of costs, McFarlane said, ” In seeking to vary/lift reporting restrictions, the standard approach as to costs in children cases will apply and a reporter, media organisation or their 6 lawyers should not be at risk of a costs order unless he or she has engaged in reprehensible behaviour or has taken an unreasonable stance.”

You can read the guidance here.

McFarlane

 

 

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,496 other subscribers

Contact Researching Reform

For Litigants in Person

October 2019
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Sep   Nov »

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 812 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: