• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • Guide To Making A Subject Access Request
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Monthly Archives: September 2019

Little Voices, Big Impact

16 Monday Sep 2019

Posted by Natasha in child welfare, Children, Researching Reform

≈ 4 Comments

Welcome to another week.

As the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of the Child celebrates its 30th anniversary this year, the UN has decided to highlight the milestone with a campaign they have called Little Voices Big Impact.

The campaign runs today and includes a line-up of speakers in Geneva, who will be discussing the Convention and the state of child rights in 2019.

The UN are inviting people to pledge their support for child rights on Twitter, and as part of that campaign, we would like to ask children and young people to share their wishes about how they would like the UK government to protect their rights going forward. We invite families to share their thoughts too.

Screenshot 2019-09-16 at 10.25.35.png

Any responses we receive before 2pm London Time will be made into a collage and shared with the UN, who have promised to feature tweets using their campaign hash tag #LittleVoicesBigImpact, and include the sentiments in their discussions.

If you’d like to take part, please leave your pledge or wish, along with your first name (or ‘anon’ if you would rather not be identified) and your age, on the Researching Reform website.

UN0296105_CRC_30

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Top Human Rights Court Rules Forced Adoption Violates Right To Family Life

13 Friday Sep 2019

Posted by Natasha in forced adoption, Researching Reform

≈ 22 Comments

In a groundbreaking case, the European Court of Human Rights ruled on Tuesday that a child services agency breached a mother and her son’s rights by forcibly removing her son and giving him to a foster family several years after he was removed from her custody as a newborn.

The grand chamber of the European Court of Human Rights concluded that Norway’s Barnevernet child services agency had violated Trude Lobben and her son’s rights to family life, and had not carried out adequate investigations into the mother’s parenting skills or provided adequate evidence to bolster its claim that the child was vulnerable and that adoption was in his best interest.

L1.png

In a statement published on ADF International, a faith-based legal advocacy organization promoting human rights, Lobben’s lawyer, Grégory Thuan Dit Dieudonne, said:

“Human rights advocates have been highlighting the destructive practices of the Barnevernet for years. This ruling is a step in the right direction for parental rights in Norway and beyond. Even a positive judgment cannot make up the precious 10 years this family has lost at the hands of the Norwegian state.”

L4

Ms. Lobben told Norway’s TV2 that she hoped the judgment would help other families in similar predicaments:

“This must have consequences. I’m glad the decision can help many others who have experienced injustice from child welfare.”

The judgment is very long, but is a must-read for anyone interested in forced adoption and the human rights concerns around social services practicing this policy.

For those who don’t want to read the details in full, there is a very good summary of the case on the Christian Post.

L5.png

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Child Protection Sector Harms Children’s Mental Health.

12 Thursday Sep 2019

Posted by Natasha in child welfare, Researching Reform, social services, social work

≈ 7 Comments

A report by the Children’s Commissioner on children’s experiences inside the care system highlights the appalling way in which children are being treated, and evidences the serious emotional harm the sector is causing these children.

The report, which is 14 pages long and features 22 children and young adults aged between 9 and 21, offers extracts from interviews in which children and young adults describe how the care system treated them and how that treatment made them feel.

While there are a few good experiences shared by children (most of which stem from support given by individuals outside of the care system), the report makes for a read which is both embarrassing and deeply troubling.

The most concerning revelation comes from several children in care who explain that the lack of proper care inside the system directly damaged their mental health, highlighting once again that the child protection system is causing tangible harm to the children it is supposed to be looking after.

One example given was that a change in social worker caused children to have to relive past traumatic events, because they had to talk about their past again.

An exceptionally high turnover in social workers around the country means that children are often having to relive painful past experiences – including the act of separation itself – multiple times.

Despite the volumes of research available on how to look after children, and the very obvious knowledge gaps inside the child protections system – which existed long before austerity – children are also still being left to languish on their own, separated from their siblings and moved sometimes hundreds of miles away from anything familiar to them.

The same tired themes of stability and mental health feature in this document, themes which have been clearly labelled and identified a thousand times over, in child welfare campaigns, scientific data and pioneering social work.

This report is not insightful, or trail blazing, but it is worth sharing the quotes from the children who took part in these interviews, because every one of their voices matter.

You can access all of the quotes published, here.

Below are a selection of quotes which we think broadly capture the key sentiments of the children interviewed. Please read all of them, if you can:

“[Social services] don’t do enough to guarantee the emotional wellbeing of that child, and the psychological wellbeing, it can have a big impact on kids because there’s all that stability gone. … It can have a lot of psychological damage on a kid, and you get the kids acting out, you get kids being rebellious, going off and doing drugs, and they turn down paths, and get involved with the wrong people, and I feel like, a lot of the time, that can be prevented. If they just put more measures in place to make sure kids really understand why this is happening, it’s not their fault, and I just feel like a lot more should be offered, like counselling definitely.” (Female, Care leaver)

“My behaviour got a bit uncontrollable [when moved placement to another town]. It’s because I still wasn’t given the help I want, I needed… Like I needed therapeutic help and I didn’t get it. And then when I moved to [new town following another placement move], I finally got it … It [therapy] made me get rid of all my anger … I haven’t kicked off as often as I used to.” (Female, 13)

“I probably cried myself to sleep each night, the first week.” (Male, 17)

“I was worried a lot at the time. Because it was unknown to where we would be going, how it would be like.” (Female, 16)

My social worker, I ask her so many times, what’s going to happen in my future, I’m really scared. I want to know what’s going to happen in my future and she’s just, she can’t be arsed to talk about it.” (Female, 15)

“But the more you move to different places and then the more you just get used to it … It’s just [breathes out], it’s just tiring … I don’t know how to explain it, you do literally feel tired, you hear it and it’s just like [breathes out] go back to bed.” (Female, 15)

“I think it [moving placements] just had an impact on … how I act, how I controlled my emotions. If I felt angry now, I’d just hold it in but then I would just lash out.” (Female,16)

“I was going through a lot of instability at the time… and I was making decisions that I probably wouldn’t rationally make normally, like running away from school and things like that. Yeah, they well and truly were [due to the instability], and it I guess it was a coping mechanism.” (Male, 17)

“Well they just said that he’s getting adopted to North England. That’s all I’m now allowed to know. … When she told me that he was gone, I just broke down… It was hard, I would cry every single day at school. I’d get taken out of lessons because I just couldn’t cope with it.” (Female, 18)

“I was out of school for three weeks rather than two, because the woman we was given to help me find a new school didn’t really do her job properly… I understand that she’s busy with loads of other people, but she left me and my mum on a voice message for a whole week, then a second week. We gave her a call and we actually got through to her and said, OK, we said to her, oh what’s happening, why haven’t you found a school yet, haven’t you found a school yet or are you just ignoring us, and she said, well I haven’t found a school yet, let me, just give me time. And she left us for another week.” (Male, 16)

“I didn’t meet my new social worker for quite a while, and then I met her a couple of times, and then I got another one. And it’s just like, well I only saw you three times and you’re already leaving, am I that bad? And it just makes you feel like you’re worthless, you’re not valued, and you’ve done something wrong all the time. It also makes you feel like you’re not important to them, and they don’t want to be with you, they don’t want to work with you, they’re just doing it because they have to. So it just makes a real downer on the young person, it makes them feel like, have very low self-esteem and low confidence in themselves.” (Female, 17)

Screenshot 2019-09-12 at 09.58.15

 

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Lawsuit Claims Forced Adoption Breaches Legislation

11 Wednesday Sep 2019

Posted by Natasha in forced adoption, Researching Reform

≈ 6 Comments

A mother who was forced to give up her child for adoption in the Netherlands is suing the state for emotional damage.

The lawsuit claims that a policy which allowed the state to forcibly remove her child from her care was in breach of Dutch and international law.

Trudy Scheele-Gertsen, who is now 73, is one of over 10,000 women in the Netherlands who gave up their children at birth in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. She was also the first woman to take the Netherlands government to court over the legality of forced adoption at the time the policy was enacted.

The lawsuit cites several procedural irregularities, which it says led to Scheele-Gertsen’s son languishing in care for the first three years of his life.

Speaking to Dutch newspaper, Trouw, yesterday, Ms Scheele-Gertsen said, “What was done to me and my son is disgraceful, that is the main reason I am going to court.’

The legal claim also hopes to shed light on why state institutions promoted the idea that unmarried mothers could not care for their children.

The lawsuit comes as the Netherlands launches its own inquiry into why single mothers gave their children up for adoption.

The Netherlands Association of Separated Mothers told Dutch News that the forced adoption process was riddled with procedural errors, which were either consciously or unconsciously a result of deliberate policy which prejudiced unmarried women.

lawsuit

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

In The News

10 Tuesday Sep 2019

Posted by Natasha in News, Researching Reform

≈ Leave a comment

The latest child welfare items that should be right on your radar:

  • Major review into support for children with special educational needs 
  • EU children in custody to be stripped of rights as Home Office prevents them from applying for settled status
  • New guide for parents of LGBT+ children

boy-reading-newspaper-new-001

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

UK Child Rights Campaigner Dies

09 Monday Sep 2019

Posted by Natasha in Researching Reform

≈ 9 Comments

Maggie Tuttle, who founded the child welfare charity Children Screaming To Be Heard, has died.

She passed away on the evening of the 5th September after a long battle with illness, and was cremated near her home in Los Belones, Spain, in a small private ceremony, according to her wishes, on 9th September.

Maggie was passionate about improving the child welfare system, and her work often focused on children who had been neglected by the government.

As a child rights campaigner, Maggie worked in several fields during her lifetime.

Maggie was a direct force inside the system, forging powerful networks and assisting children directly through her advocacy. While in London she would regularly visit homeless children living in tunnels and under archways, offering them food, blankets and emotional support.

She was particularly astute at finding voices inside the family justice system which were going unheard, and ensuring they were amplified by her charity, and when we could help, sites like Researching Reform.

Maggie advocated tirelessly to ensure that parents could remain in contact with their children wherever possible when going through the courts and she fought hard for grandparents to have the right to contact with their grandchildren during separation, divorce and care placements.

This extract from her charity’s blog offers an insight into Maggie’s life, and humanitarian efforts: most of which were unpaid. The 2014 blog post was written by Maggie:

“Aged 19 I toured the world as a singer in stage productions. At the same time I experienced the suffering of children in many countries and this was the start of wanting to do some thing positive to help people and children.

In 1970, after my last world tour, I resigned from showbiz to marry and one year later my only child was born.

In 1972, I was voted Miss Islington with at the same time joining the Gaytones and organising at the Islington Town Hall (Old Time Music Hall Shows) for the elderly. I also assisted Councillor Barnard of Islington Council on meetings in Parliament.

Then I met Paddy O’Conner who offered housing for prisoners’ wives and families. In 1973 I helped to organise a help line for families of prisoners and in 1975 with the support of Roy Friedman, a lawyer in Welbeck Street, London, and his wife Denise Friedman a Barrister I became the founder of a charity for prisoners wives and families with financial funding from the Home Office (Mr Evens Prison Department).

I organised the first nursery to be built for prisoners’ wives to enable them to go back to work. I also brought change to the prison system, lectured in prisons, and Capital Gold brought a caravan in St Oseths so that wives and children of prisoners could have a holiday, along with an overnight hostel in Islington for women and children visiting families in London prisons. Adjacent to this I organised a hostel for women from Holloway prison. This charity is now known as PACT with Andy Keens-Down as the director.

There were times when I supported St Mungos charity working in the early hours of the mornings. We did the soup runs in central London to feed the homeless.

In 1978 I was asked to help set up hostels in Hackney for the homeless. I worked with Sammy and Eddy Iranie. The hostels accommodated up to 60 people. I was also the health visitor for children at risk once all was established, and then I moved on.

In 1980 I was asked by Dr John Reed, the Psychiatrist of F Block of the Hackney Hospital, to set up accommodation to help people from the hospital to adjust back into society and with the support of Hackney council supporting with empty council houses this all then became registered as a charity (The Vanguard Commune).

In 1981 I bought a hotel and public house In Spalding (The White Lion) and supported the very young and opened a disco twice a week. After one year I sold everything and
in 1983 bought a property in La Manga Spain and built a health centre with three houses.

This became known as La Manga health centre with private accommodation, three consulting rooms, full size tennis court, pool, with organic food grown in the grounds. The health centre was also a centre for women from the menopausal help line to have free holidays and care. I owned the health centre for 23 years and sold it in 2005/6.

Alongside the health centre, in 1984 I opened my own store in La Manga Spain known and trade marked as Ardly Arrods. I was the main fund raiser, raising many thousands of pounds for electric wheel chairs for the disabled children of Murcia with the store having a restaurant and coffee shop which was the meeting place for ex-pats. From time to time I produced shows putting on the Ritz to raise funding for elderly ex-pats.

In December 2005/6 Ardly Arrods and the Health Centre were both sold to enable me to return to the UK to be with my family, although I use to fly to London once a month.

In 1989 I bought a property which became known as Fun Tott’s Day Nursery in Muswell Hill North London, and was also the chairperson for the childminding Association. I brought change for child minding to be in the High Street and at the same time I was on the committee for the Haringey community, and also a volunteer in the evenings with the Baptist Church in Dukes Avenue, London, feeding the homeless.

From 1995 to 2003, I set up a helpline and campaigned for justice for women world wide against Hormone Replacement Therapy and in 1998 I hired the whole of the Brighton Conference Centre and organised the first conference in the world on the side effects of H.R.T.

Doctors came from all parts of the world as guest speakers with world wide media attention which led to a book being written by the best selling Author Martin Walker, which used my data base which had in excess of 11,000 women’s experiences.

I was also invited to Downing Street by Baroness Cumberlege, and in 2000 the National Health Service registered the menopausal help line as the National help line for hormone advice for England Scotland and Wales.

In 2007, due to my knowledge of alternative health I was invited to India by Doctor Leo Rebello to be guest speaker at two AIDS conferences and to study and work with the street children.

I have also worked in Cairo Egypt with Doctor Adel Badr with the street children.

In 2010 the charity (Children Screaming To Be Heard) was registered for research into why many children are being failed by the care system. The charity [was] in the process of raising funds for organising the first safe houses for the runaway children.

I [was] in touch with many Ministers and Lords, and in 2013 submitted to Earl Listowel and Sir James Munby suggestions for the new children’s and families bill still being debated in the House of Lords. Much of the research was also forwarded to many children’s ministers and Government departments.”

In 2014, Maggie continued to campaign the government to build safe houses for children who had experienced abuse and neglect. She also asked the BBC to raise a monument in memory of all those children who had lost their lives to abuse. 

Researching Reform is grateful to Maggie for all the important child welfare developments she shared with us over the years and for her kindness in conferring the benefit of her vast experience on the project.

We may not have always agreed with Maggie’s point of view on various topics, but her heart was enormous and her spirit indomitable. Our thoughts are with her grandson, and extended family.

Many thanks to Andy for alerting us to Maggie’s blog post.

CSTBHW.png

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Buzz

06 Friday Sep 2019

Posted by Natasha in News, Researching Reform

≈ 1 Comment

The latest child welfare items that should be right on your radar:

  • Police chief faces backlash over comments suggesting those who used guns could have their children taken into state care
  • Con artist who defrauded a desperate mother going through family court is jailed 
  • Love me or leave me: the possible impact of Brexit on families in the UK and beyond

Buzz

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Civil Justice Council Launches Consultation On Vulnerable Witnesses

05 Thursday Sep 2019

Posted by Natasha in Consultation, Researching Reform

≈ Leave a comment

The Civil Justice Council has just launched a consultation which invites respondents to offer feedback on ways in which vulnerable witnesses could be better supported by the courts.

The consultation will look at the current procedures and legislation around vulnerable witnesses in the family courts, and will focus in part on the cross-examination of vulnerable and alleged vulnerable witnesses by proven and alleged domestic violence offenders.

Vulnerable witnesses inside the justice system can include children, victims of sexual abuse and domestic violence and parties with physical and mental health conditions.

While the consultation aims to look at issues arising in both civil and criminal courts in relation to vulnerable parties, the consultation has been launched specifically because  of a recommendation made by the nation’s Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), which was added in its April 2018 Interim Report.

In that report, the IICSA recommended special statutory protections for vulnerable witnesses who had experienced child sexual abuse and who were claiming compensation in civil court cases for that abuse. The panel also advised that those protections should be in line with legislation supporting vulnerable witnesses in criminal courts across the country.

The Ministry of Justice asked the Civil Justice Council to consider the issues raised by the Inquiry’s recommendation and to put together a report.

Though the exact percentage of vulnerable witnesses going through the civil and family courts is not known, in the criminal courts 18% of witness were recorded by the Crown Prosecution Service as either vulnerable or intimidated from 2015 to 2017.

However, a civil court user survey indicated that 25% of individual Claimants who completed the questionnaire said that they considered they had a physical or mental condition.

In the Justice Council’s report, the Council says that there is “clear room for improvement in the way that claims relating to child sexual abuse cases are managed by parties and the Court.” It added , “In undertaking this [consultation], the Council was asked to consider vulnerability of parties and/or witnesses in civil actions not just in relation to claims arising from sexual assault/abuse but also more widely i.e. in relation to the wide variety of other types of civil claim.”

Pages 20 to 33 of the consultation set out the background to vulnerable witnesses inside the family courts, what has been done so far to address concerns about how these witnesses are treated and the current gaps inside these courts when it comes to protecting vulnerable witnesses.

These pages offer a very useful breakdown of how such witnesses have been treated in the family courts historically, new initiatives being implemented, and current legislation being considered like the Domestic Abuse Bill.

The report the Council produces runs to 74 pages, and includes 7 recommendations:

  1. Amend the current procedure rules (and any relevant accompanying practice directions) to focus the attention of all civil Judges, parties and advocates upon the issue of vulnerability;
  2. Directions Questionnaires should be amended to request information as to the vulnerability or potential vulnerability of a party;
  3. Enhanced training of civil judges in relation to issues of vulnerability;
  4. HMCTS should review and produce guidance in relation to the use and funding of
    intermediaries in civil cases;
  5. HMCTS should ensure that individual court centres/courts should (after consultation with the Designated Civil Judge and Designated Family Judge) prepare comprehensive operational protocols around vulnerable witnesses;
  6. As a matter of urgency HMCTS should ensure all staff who handle civil cases are given adequate training with regard to identifying, communicating with and assisting vulnerable court users and;
  7. The Judicial College and the CPS should consider the need for guidance /training/re-enforcement of training as to applications for and the making of/refusal to make compensation orders in cases of sexual assault/abuse.

The consultation itself is short, running to just three questions.

These questions are:

  1. Are there issues in relation to vulnerable parties /witnesses in the civil courts which that have not been covered/adequately covered within this preliminary report? If so please give relevant details;
  2. Do you agree with the proposed recommendations set out at section 7? If not why not? and;
  3. Do you believe that there should be further or alternative recommendations? If so please set out relevant details.

Responses to the consultation can be emailed to vulnerableparties-CJC-consultation@judiciary.uk, or popped in the post to:

Civil Justice Council E205, Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL

The Council also offer the following guidance:

“If you are responding in writing, please make it clear which questions you are responding to. You should also indicate whether you are replying as an individual or submitting an official response on behalf of an organisation and include: – your full name, – your position (if applicable), – the name of organisation (if applicable), – an address (including post-code), – an email address, and – a contact telephone number.”

A list of respondents will be published on the Council’s website, as well as a summary of the responses received.

Deadline for submissions is 23:59 on Friday 11 October 2019.

You can read the Council’s report and access the consultation questions here. 

CJC

 

 

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Care Leaver Internships with the Civil Service

04 Wednesday Sep 2019

Posted by Natasha in Interesting Things, Researching Reform

≈ 3 Comments

As part of the government’s Care Leaver Internship Scheme, two new internships have been offered.

The internships, which are both paid, are for jobs working as an Administrative Officer and an Executive Officer within the Department for Education.

Other government bodies who have participated in the care leaver internships scheme include the Department of Health and Social Care, the Department for Work and Pensions, the Foreign & Commonwealth Office, the Ministry of Justice and the Crown Prosecution Service.

You can apply for the positions if you were eligible for a leaving care support package when you left care, and are aged between 18 and 30. No qualifications are required for these positions.

The roles can be taken up in one of forty eight locations around the country.

The government’s web page for the internships offers the following descriptions for each job:

  • Administrative Officer (typical salary £17,400 per annum); you will be working in a supporting administrative role with no line management responsibilities, and typically within a team structure.
  • Executive Officer (typical salary £20,000 per annum); you will be involved in problem solving, business planning and policy making within Government. They usually work within a supportive team structure, under the direction of relevant team leaders. They can also hold individual responsibility for pieces of work within a programme or project. Those that apply unsuccessfully for the Executive Officer role may be considered for the Administrative Officer role.

Applications need to be submitted online through the civil service job site and the deadline for applying for these roles is five minutes before midnight, on 26th September.

If you have any questions you can email the government at leavers.care@education.gov.uk, or WhatsApp them on +44 7502 496583.

Full details can be accessed on the government’s internship page. 

 

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

In The News

03 Tuesday Sep 2019

Posted by Natasha in News, Researching Reform

≈ 3 Comments

The latest child welfare items that should be right on your radar:

  • Social workers face troubling questions over the death of three-year-old Alfie Lamb after his mother’s boyfriend pleads guilty to crushing him to death with a car seat – England 
  • New Bill will ‘strengthen children’s rights’ in family law court cases – Scotland 
    • Press release for Scotland’s new Children’s Bill (includes draft of the Bill)
  • Thousands of vulnerable children risk falling foul to hostile environment due to ‘woefully inadequate’ support – EU

boy-reading-newspaper-new-001

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Telegram
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,594 other subscribers

Contact Researching Reform

For Litigants in Person

September 2019
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« Aug   Oct »

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 820 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: