The Supreme Court has overturned a ruling in the Court of Appeal which prevented children who had been abused from suing alerted local authorities who did nothing to protect them.
This is a very welcome development.
The previous judgment in the Court of Appeal had effectively blocked claims by survivors who were known to be suffering but did not find themselves in full time state care, or subject to a care order of any kind. The ruling affected a significant number of cases and left victims feeling traumatised and sidelined.
The latest decision in the Supreme Court now means that children can sue for negligence where a local authority failed to protect them from harm.
Some quotes from members of the legal team and researchers who worked to help represent the claimants in the case have been published in an article by the Independent.
Peter Garsden, a partner at Simpson Millar, who acted on behalf of children’s charities Article 39 and The Care Leavers’ Association: “This is a groundbreaking decision that has served to clarify the law as far as the duty of care that social workers have towards young people and children who are not necessarily in a care institution, but are known to be at risk.
“This decision affects some of the most vulnerable members of our society and we are delighted that those affected will continue to have access to the justice that they deserve in instances where they are let down by those they have put their faith in.”
Carolyne Willow, director at Article 39: “We are particularly concerned about the continuing scandals of mistreatment in child prisons and local authorities’ failures to take robust, protective action.”
David Graham, national Director of The Care Leavers Association: “We hope the courts will now quickly deal with the backlog of cases from adults who were failed as children.”
The Local Government Association (LGA), which represents councils in England and Wales said they would look at the ruling and “carefully assess any implications for local authorities.”
Further Reading:
- New Ruling Blocks Abuse Survivors From Suing Councils – Here’s How To Reverse It.
- LANDMARK RULING: Foster Children Can Now Sue Local Authorities For Abuse (2017)
They put words in to our children
LikeLike
Isn’t it amazing that a Supreme Court had to make a ruling that should have been a given!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Children removed from parents suffer trauma all the time! Children’s court does not have to
“prove” allegations made by Cps! CPS manufacture lies to make a case about parents, and make it extremely difficult for parents to prove their innocence
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a huge step forward for children that are also being abused in the care system now today..they have rights to have their own solicister ..i’m hoping ss will now focus on removing children that truly need to be safeguarded instead of removing children that parents just needed a little support..the foster care and adoption targets set out by government has lead to ss removing children that are not abused in any which way to feed a profit industry run by the fostering and adoption agencies including legal aid solicitors feeding from the trough .. this has brought so much corruption within the system that has fed bank accounts from judges to mp’s ..it has fed the grooming business it has allowed pedophiles to operate within the system ..time to drain the swamp
LikeLiked by 2 people
If they are serious about preventing abuse why not ALLOW children in care to report abuse by fosterers to parents at contact? At present they are banned ,free speech is suppressed and contact stopped immediately if abuse is reported or discussed .
LikeLiked by 2 people
The big Scandal is that LAs are preventing Children from having a Voice by unlawfully blocking referrals to groups like NYAS. also information gathered from the Child by Schools and mental health groups such as Place2be who work with troubled children in Schools are denying access to the data they collect from Children. even denying FOiRs.
this has been flagged up to various Govt depts but nothing is ever done about it.
LikeLike
That’s a catch 22 exspecily if the child doesn’t really know the meaning of abuse or if they don’t even realize the abuser abusing them from being raised by the person looking up to them and they are the father/parent not knowing any better as per the other parent trying to provide structure and guidance when the child gets angry they feel there being abused .
LikeLiked by 1 person