Researching Reform’s open letter to the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, which asks the senior judge to overhaul the family courts’ approach to cases has been published by The Times.
The letter asks the President to remove the adversarial process inside the family courts, and explains that the culture inside the system is responsible for the system’s deterioration rather than austerity measures.
The letter outlines how the adversarial process increases conflict, allows lawyers to profit from the chaos that follows and as a result leaves law firms with no incentive to address the courts’ underlying issues. In the open letter, Researching Reform uses private family law processes to highlight the damage the current approach causes, and how an adversarial justice system for family cases has ultimately destroyed the legal profession.
The letter is behind a pay wall but is available to read at no cost by registering your details with The Times.
For those interested in legal issues, The Times Law daily newsletter, The Brief, sends everything straight to your inbox so you don’t have to fish around for the latest developments within the family justice system and elsewhere. Twitter users can also follow The Brief over at @JudgeJohnHack.
Very many thanks to The Times for publishing our letter.
Very well done Natasha. Why not try other papers, and perhaps have the letter signed by many of your supporters who have been through this failed system?
LikeLiked by 4 people
Pingback: The Times publishes Researching Reform’s open letter to Family Court President – ExposingTheLeft
Well done!
Even after a decade of konstant and senseless litigation via doussins of hearings in front of an array of different judges, I am still taken aback by the Kafkaesk environment every time I not only step into the court, but step into the process yet again.
One day volumes will be written by law historians about how profoundly wrong this and previous generation of judges and politicians got it. Millions of children lost loving parents with devastating consequences for society and thousands of lawyers weee gaming the system sucking blood from families in crises. Incompetent judges with no stake in the outcome supported by a CAFCASS semaingly unaware of what good looks like for children oblivious to the progress made in Northern Europe decades ago. It is corrupt, outdated and incompetent at its core. And no-one apparently is responsible.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Well done Natasha with the number one blog.
Number one blog because it’s one done with transparency and you really do bring stories/articles and information across fair and balanced, yet you manage to weigh this up and still be supportive to the families who are/have suffered so so much injustice at the same time.
I’m so happy and pleased, getting Researching Forum’s open letter to the family court president published in ‘The Times.’. Especially after coming across this article today on top-
https://inews.co.uk/news/courts-should-be-allowed-to-order-a-baby-into-care-ahead-of-its-birth-says-senior-judge/?fbclid=IwAR1gx1EU-weY1gBQiJibm8wG4EELOLo10nda-jET4pt51O0QcTRGJmhZk4o
Well done Xx
LikeLiked by 3 people
What a terrible story, thank you for sharing it. Thank you for your amazing support too and all the incredible work you do xxxx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aww, god bless you and thank you too Xxxxxx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well done your making getting our voice heard … thank you God Bless you and your important work!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Really kind of you, thank you. Credit to The Times also for being so supportive.
LikeLike
typo please omit the word ‘making’ no edit my end!
LikeLiked by 1 person
i have noted in the past that there is no edit feature to correct errors.it would be good to have this.
LikeLike
I have an edit button as a poster (rather than as an admin for the site), so not sure why you don’t have one?
LikeLike
I dont see any Edit button when posting a reply etc. only ”
Cancel reply” thats it.
LikeLike
Not sure why. Maybe it is something to do with how posters access the site or register. I’m sorry, I can’t offer more than that.
LikeLike
Well done
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Musings of a Penpusher and commented:
At last; a sensible response to some questionable proceedings and an overlong wait for the wheels of justice to turn in the right direction.
LikeLiked by 2 people
A heartening result at last.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Keep up the good work,
its slow and tough to make an impact in this controversial arena but constant impact on the shell of this tough nut will eventually produce Cracks and the Dam will break in the end.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Having fairly recently been put through the mincer of the family court system, I’d definitely agree with Ms Phillips, and it’s refreshing to see an insider put forward such a compassionate view. The conflict that some of these lawyers stir up, presumably to drag matters out and make them more expensive, beggars belief, yet it is the only recourse we have. I fail to see how it can be claimed that this system has destroyed the legal profession when they continue to profit from it. It does not however I believe increase the respect that the public has for such a system, neither does it lead us to trust that we will be treated fairly by it.
The system is in my view not fit for purpose, but I suspect that reform would be difficult because of the vested interests acting within it. Definitely food for thought.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pingback: To Our Readers: Merry Christmas, Thank You, Let’s Make 2019 A Monster | Researching Reform