The Justice Committee, a parliamentary group set up to examine the policies, spending and administration of the Ministry of Justice and related public bodies, published a report on 3rd July, which recommends reworking the current criminal law guidelines for sentencing around child cruelty offences, including the need to obtain expert evidence on psychological harm, and developmental harm on a child.
The recommendations were made after the government floated a consultation on the topic. Respondents included judges, criminal justice organisations, local government, members of the public, lawyers and NHS bodies.
The report tells us that 623 offenders were sentenced for child cruelty crimes, in 2016, with 6 offenders sentenced for causing or allowing the death of a child, and 23 for causing or allowing serious physical harm to a child. To date, there have been no convictions under Section 3A of the FGM Act 2003.
The report also confirms that more women than men have been sentenced for these offences.
Cruelty to a Child can be broken down into four categories; assault and ill-treatment, neglect, abandonment and failure to protect.
Key proposed changes to the guidelines:
- The addition of two further offences: causing or allowing a child to die or suffer serious physical harm, and failing to protect a child from the risk of female genital mutilation (FGM);
- Setting a lower starting point for offenders who have failed to protect a child from cruelty, as opposed to inflicting it;
- Engaging expert evidence to determine psychological harm/developmental harm
- A new range of aggravating factors: for example, those in positions of power, such as a teacher or priest;
- A new range of mitigating factors, such as remorse and good character
- Looking at ways to clarify the law around failing to protect a child and committing an act against that child. The guidelines currently combine the two elements when the perpetrator of direct harm in the household is not known;
- Taking into account the complex cultural and social context which leads parents to mistakenly believe that FGM is in a girl’s best interests, during the sentencing process
The report’s findings and recommendations are likely to engage child abuse campaigners and family law reformers, who would like to see tougher sentencing for child abusers and a great deal more solid evidence in risk of future harm cases.
You can access the report here.
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
Why not allow abused children in care to report their abuse to parents or police?
Not much point making reports like these about child neglect if the child is brutally gagged !
LikeLiked by 2 people
This is a tricky one as it could improve the system in the best interests of the child or it could make it worse and boost business for the mainly SS run Fostering and Adoption agencies.
“a great deal more solid evidence in risk of future harm cases”.
this is the most significant area to focus on. thousands of childrens and parents lives have been shattered based on the Future harm nonsense.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here we go again more meetings going no where, same as an apology re the adoptions, how many millions have been paid in more wages
to the MPs and so the meetings will go on and on the MPs love their money more then kids in care being abused trafficked and much more.
Now using experts to access child abuse what do MPs think we are all stupid, when a kid is taken into care they are surrounded by so
called experts all working in a ring, kids cannot speak to a judge with out an advocate or a social worker and do remember kids in care most
live in fear and should they speak out boy are they in trouble, kids in care need the family to tell of their abuse and should they speak of
abuse the kids get moved around, even moving kids around is more money for the agencies, the agencies same as the whole system In a
child’s best interest will be paid untold money, so another meeting going no where only more tax payers money for the child abusers.
THOUGHTS ON “JUSTICE COMMITTEE SUGGESTS USING EXPERTS TO ASSESS PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM ON CHILDREN”
LikeLike
Pingback: New Sentencing Guidelines For Child Cruelty Offences To Come Into Force | Researching Reform
Pingback: New Sentencing Guidelines For Child Cruelty Offences To Come Into Force | HOLLIE GREIG JUSTICE : KAREN IRVING IS EL COYOTE IS SNAKE LOGAN