The Sentencing Council has this morning, published a new set of guidelines advising courts to jail offenders breaching court orders, including sexual harm prevention orders and non molestation orders. The guidelines will come into effect on 1st October, 2018.
The guidance comes after an investigation by The Sentencing Council found that courts were routinely imposing penalties far below the recommended maximum allowed by law.
A consultation launched by The Sentencing Council confirmed that virtually no data was currently available on the types of orders breached, and information about those breaches was also no collected or stored. The consultation also reveals a further, deeply concerning issue: entrenched cultural views inside the criminal justice system around sex abuse and how the crime is perceived by professionals inside the court system. Whilst the Sentencing Council is clearly advocating for jail time where sex offenders breach an order, the majority of respondents in the consultation took the view that the current sentences being passed down in cases like these, were adequate. Here’s an extract from the report:
“The majority of respondents believed the [sex offence] penalties to be proportionate, although a small proportion thought in some cases they were too lenient. As already noted, some respondents did not approve of the proposals and thought the penalties were too high, noting a marked difference between sentences in existing guidance.”
This view exists, despite the fact that studies have shown a growing concern about the UK’s sentencing of sex offenders, both in relation to how judges currently decide penalties and the outdated way in which the law operates in this area.
The idea that sex abuse is still not considered a serious offence by judges is something that needs to be investigated, separately, in another consultation.
Another issue aggravating sentencing decisions stems around the current crisis in our prisons. Overcrowded and under resourced, judges and police have been trying to address the problem by sparing offenders jail. Allowing sex offenders to walk free purely because our prisons and our police force can’t cope with the demand should never be allowed.
The guidelines published today do not represent a landmark move towards greater protection of vulnerable men and women and the public at large. The Council issued guidance in February of this year, calling on tougher penalties and jail time for domestic abuse offenders, however there seems to have been little uptake on these guidelines, which have now been in force for over four months.
Until the government addresses the cultural problems inside the system guidelines like these will remain largely unused. Researching Reform suggests judges should be given rigorous training on the characteristics and impact of sexual abuse, as well as listening to presentations by victims of abuse, in order to understand the crime better.
Bad news for those who are Falsely accused of DA in the family courts. people will be going to jail even when they are innocent.more Tax payers Money down the drain. at £800+ pw per prisoner its expensive keeping people in jail.
LikeLike
The Government make millions a year from the prison industry known as PRINDUS, Woolworths use to have all of their garden furniture made by prisoners in Pentonville prison, Burtons use to have their suits made by the prisoners and it goes on what is made by prisoners and millions for the Governments who pay pennies to the prisoners, in the 70 s when i organised the prisoners wives and families society now known as PACT I learnt of PRINDUS and i asked Governments to pay prisoners a wage so that prisoners could support their families no answer. So the more prisoners more money for the Governments as for sex offenders lock them in a cell all alone 24 by 24 and let them be abused sexually and sexual abuse does go on in prison
LikeLike
I am also concerned about some of the wrongful accusations that have appeared in the news and their consequences on the lives of those who become victims of unjustified accusations. It suggests that a certain amount of anonymity should be allowed initially; both to the accused, as well as to the accuser, until guilt has been established beyond reasonable doubt.
I’m not sure prison is the solution for such offenders, although the offence, if proved, deserves a serious penalty and one that will serve as a real deterrent. Perhaps humiliation through unwanted publicity or curfew and tagging to restrict freedom of movement as well as the imposition of a huge fine might suffice.
The latter might be taken directly from wages or salary over a period commensurate with a prison sentence as long as the physical threat posed could be completely neutralized. So far, only a prison sentence can guarantee that – and it is the threat of violation that is most intimidating for the victim.
Of course, at the end of the sentence, the threat of violation could start again when the offender is freed. Prison cannot guarantee a cure so the conundrum remains for no one can have the perfect answer.
LikeLike
Pingback: New Guidelines Urge Courts To Jail Sex Offenders and Domestic Abusers Who Breach Orders « Musings of a Penpusher
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike