2018 is set to be another interesting year for child welfare.
If last year was about government understanding how children impact the economy and society from the ground up, this year will be about a broader awareness of how government can empower under resourced services by looking at the ingenious ways in which families have begun to access information.
The first trend policy makers and stakeholders will need to watch is the growing use of social media, by both families and professionals. Parents and children have been using social media for several years now, primarily for support and advice purposes. Social workers are taking to sites like Facebook and Twitter to contact hard to reach families, and to gain some insight into their service users. Like all internet activity, it can be a force for good when used properly, but there are still some important concerns surrounding child professionals’ use of the net to gather information about service users, which center around privacy.
For some thoughts on how this trend has been developing, these articles below offer information and the latest guidance in this area:
- Social Workers Told To Keep On Posting, In New Social Media Guidance
- Social workers could use social media checks to ‘enhance’ assessments, serious case review says
Our advice to service users: if you don’t wish to have you information accessed by anyone other than friends and family, make your accounts online private, using the settings provided on each platform. Vet friend requests as well.
Our advice to professionals: don’t break the law. Privacy is real, and it’s protected by statute and regulation. Make sure that you know the rules in this area and if you don’t, take the initiative and access guidelines for yourself, and your team.
Another trend to watch is the rise of the informed parent across medical matters. This phenomenon was first highlighted by the Ashya King case, where the parents disagreed with doctors about how to treat their son’s cancer and fled abroad to get the treatment they wanted for Ashya. In this case, the parents had done their own, meticulous, research. The treatment Ashya received abroad worked, and he made a full recovery, despite the original doctors saying it wouldn’t and threatening to remove Ashya from his parents in the process. The latest case on this issue was reported last week, with parents rejecting a hospital’s care plan because the family believe the recommendations are detrimental to their daughter. They have also been threatened with the removal of their daughter if they don’t comply, but they’re not giving up. The links on this trend are below:
- Timeline, in articles, of the Ashya King case
- Latest: Parents of sick child in row with hospital hit out at foster care threat
Access to information will be a major topic over the next 12 months. We predict some child welfare organisations will try to restrict that access, and others will try to infiltrate social platforms to offer their own advice and support with a view to engaging service users and winning clients. We predict this will be the big race in 2018.
Let us know what you think.
Researching Reform 
I am an old fella but I remember in the fifties the State never interfered in private family lives unless a child was so severely injured or neglected as to amount to a crime.
Nowadays a couple of professionals (sometimes social workers who cannot speak understandable English ) only have to say a child is at risk to be believed by a judge who will believe them over parents and send children to adoption or foster care.
How can a devoted but maybe ill educatedmu mum who has just given birth defend herself against. Crystal ball predictions of risk by so called experts??
Yes she is entitled to legal aid from lawyers who advise her to agree to everything the sa demand and get well paid for that!!
Stop taking children for future risk and most of the injustices would be resolved. After all perhaps the worst risk of all for children is STate care! Prostitution,drug addiction, sexual abuse,or prison await most of them and eve v social workers say that state care unfit children to be parents themselves and they make that an excuse for taking even more children into care for foster care or forced adoption!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Simply put. its an industry with big money to be made from the Misery and destruction of entire families. could it be the Crime of the Century!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dr Manhattan it is Crime of the Century its an abuse of power crystal ball law does not exist in criminal law for a reason! Imagine if they started convicted people on the basis that they ‘may’ commit a crime i.e. murder rape abuse etc in the future and are therefore a risk to the public, I predict a riot on that one, yet parents and children are estranged on the basis of ‘opinion’s’ of so called professionals based on nothing more than predictions and psycho babble (with no way of disputing fabricated reports to make parents unfit despite evidence to disprove what is written, sometimes cut & pasted reports, this happens everyday we should be rioting!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Musings of a Penpusher and commented:
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing we’re told; it would be well if social workers remembered this before thrusting their often unwelcome attentions where they are not required. Parental instincts often guide where the ‘trained minds’ of the professionals fear to go. It’s all about survival and is one of the strongest of our primeval attributes and that ‘gut’ feeling is rarely wrong.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike