A discussion in the House of Commons on Tuesday has revealed that the government will soon be announcing legislative proposals to prevent alleged and proven perpetrators of domestic violence from cross examining their partners in court.
Criminal courts currently have legislation to prevent this from happening, but no such legal protections are offered in family courts. A sharp rise in litigants in person thanks to aggressive austerity measures, is partly responsible for an alarming new trend which features alleged abusers and proven offenders questioning their victims in court. The experience often re-traumatises vulnerable victims and can lead to severe mental health problems, with some victims even taking their own lives.
To date the only way a victim of domestic violence in The Family Court can prevent an abuser from cross examining them is by asking the judge to put Practice Direction 12J into effect, which invites the judge to step in and stop the cross examination from taking place. The Practice Direction however is only a form of guidance, and does not require a judge to stop the cross examination as of right.
A new law has been on the cards for some time, however Brexit and other matters being given priority have delayed things.
Justice Minister, Dominic Raab also confirmed the following on Tuesday:
- Section 28 pre-recorded cross-examination for vulnerable witnesses will be extended to family law cases
- Around £7 million has been allocated to 97 rape support centres across England and Wales in order to provide independent specialist support
- That support will be available to victims before and after the conclusion of a trial, regardless of the verdict.
Expect to hear more details about the proposed legislation shortly. We’ll keep you posted.
If you’d like to find out how cross examination in this context affects victims in court, our article over at HuffPost has more information.
Ian Josephs said:
Not too sure about this…… Already the accusers have the advantage of anonymity that is denied to the accused in rape cases.and now they want even more. Of course many accusations of rape are genuine but many alas are not and for the latter the right to cross examine may be the last and only way for a defendant to prove innocence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Musings of a Penpusher and commented:
Reform for the better is always good news but until this is on the statute books the Family Court could help victims of abuse today just by ensuring that every Family Court and judge knows about Practice Direction 12J and uses it every time a vulnerable partner or parent risks being cross examined by an abuser.
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
Reblogged this on | truthaholics.
Pingback: REPORT: Family Courts Are Failing To Protect Domestic Abuse Survivors | Researching Reform