A debate in Westminster looking at family justice reform is to take place on Wednesday 15th November, but its underlying agenda is likely to disappoint serious reformers and raise eyebrows, too.
Whilst very little information has been offered about this debate – we still don’t know who organised or sponsored it, what the full list of topics will be and who will be attending – there are some clues on the event’s page over at the Parliament website. We have also received information from a Families Needs Fathers Cymru representative which sheds further light on the real agenda behind the debate.
The politician hosting the event is Suella Fernandes MP, who is the Conservative MP for Fareham. A former member of the Education Committee, she now sits on the Education, Skills and the Economy Sub-Committee, which looks at ways in which education can boost the economy.
Suella was also on the Draft Investigatory Powers Bill (Joint Committee). The Bill, which was ratified in 2016, came to be known as The Snooper’s Charter, for its invasive surveillance powers.
Suella’s voting record is interesting too.
Relevant to the debate itself, she is an outspoken advocate for a presumption of shared parenting, and campaigns on Fathers’ Rights issues. Her work is supported by Families Need Fathers, though it’s not clear whether she feels the same way about the Fathers’ Rights organisation.
Suella appears to have become vocal about Fathers’ Rights around March of this year, writing for news outlets like The Times, and sponsoring the Family Justice Bill in that same month. The Bill’s aim was to make Child Arrangement Orders enforceable and to establish a presumption of shared parenting in law. It was ultimately set aside during the general election, but Suella never made any attempt to revive it after the Conservatives won.
She also used the Ten Minute Rule to introduce the Bill. As politicians and researchers will tell you, this makes the Bill nothing more than a soundbite, and is not considered a serious attempt at passing a law. We wonder whether Suella was upfront about this tactic, whilst appealing to angry and often desperate fathers willing to champion anyone showing an interest in their cause. Even if that someone might be an opportunist looking to bag a share of the votes.
It’s a sentiment not lost on some Families Need Fathers campaigners. One FNF post which featured another one of Suella’s soundbites, this time from her newspaper article on Fathers Rights, hosts a series of comments from FNF supporters. One comment, from Jo Woodage, reads:
Suella never acknowledged the post or offered a response.
Coming back to the debate itself, a briefing paper is going to be made available at some point, though no time frame is given for its publication. The page does explain that if you’d like to be alerted when the briefing paper is published, you can email the team to request a notification.
As for the topics that are going to be discussed, five potential themes are listed as tags right at the bottom of the page. They are: Civil partnerships, Cohabitation, Divorce, Family law, Marriage. There are Briefings Papers listed too, which focus on contact and residence, no fault divorce, prenuptial agreements and cohabitation.
FNF Cymru seem to have much more detailed information on what the debate will actually focus on, lending fuel to the fire that Families Need Fathers have had a large hand in this event. The FNF Cymru page’s update suggests that the following topics will be discussed:
· The need for a presumption of shared parenting
· The enforcement of child arrangement orders
· No-fault divorce
· The enforceability of prenuptial agreements
· Rights of cohabiting couples
· Opening up family courts
And at the bottom of the post, we are told: “We [FNF Cymru] have provided quite a lot of input to Suella on this. Please encourage your MP to attend.”
The debate coincides with a report released recently by the Nuffield Foundation which invites the government to consider no fault divorce, as well as a report entitled A Manifesto To Strengthen Families, which was produced by the Conservatives. The recommendations in the manifesto are typical of what you might expect from the party. They focus on ways to bolster conventional marriage through financial incentives as a way to lessen economic burdens on the state, which Tories believe are brought on by a rising trend in cohabitation.
If the debate is heavily populated by Conservative MPs, it’s bound to be nothing more than an effort at ensuring policy around couples focuses on boosting conventional marriage. This could potentially turn the clock back fifty years, in much the same way that Brexit and the government’s other disastrous policies have done. That the Conservatives, and Suella, may have used the Fathers Rights movement to prop up their debate is something FNF campaigners will have to decide for themselves.
As a Westminster Hall Debate the event will take place in the Grand Committee Room, one of the rooms Researching Reform uses for its Westminster Debates and so the debate should be open to the public.
It will be interesting to see who will be speaking at this event, and what the briefing paper has to offer, too.
We’ll keep you posted.
A very big thank you to DadsHouse for alerting us to this debate, and to Paul Apreda for kindly sharing information about Families Need Fathers’ support for this event.
13 Nov.Medway children services will drag me to jail because I cririsised social workers online and named my son by his first name. Facing substantial term in.prison
LikeLike
I wonder what happened to free speech !
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Musings of a Penpusher.
LikeLike
Regrettably David Norgrove, Former chair of the Family Justice Review, 2011 chose to falsify facts originating from the Australian Family Court to bulster his somewhat lilly livered report. Until the fianacial incentives are removed from child custardy cases we will NEVER see justice in our Family Courts or those throughot the Commonwealth ,USA and beyond!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
Delighted to be able to shed a little more light on this debate https://www.facebook.com/Families-Need-Fathers-Both-Parents-Matter-Cymru-263187500387675/notifications/
LikeLike
Hi Paul, thank you for your comment, however the link doesn’t seem to be working..
LikeLike
Oh I do feel silly Natasha – hopefully this will be an improvement https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1789527924420284&id=263187500387675
LikeLike
Thank you so much for all this information, it’s much appreciated.
LikeLike
In case you missed it Suella gave a speech in the Commons under the Ten Minute Rule Bill provisions on 28th March this year https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2016-17/familyjustice.html She has been an outspoken supporter of reform of the Family Justice system
LikeLike
Pingback: The Hidden Agenda Behind Westminster’s Debate On Family Justice Reform | HOLLIE GREIG JUSTICE
Reblogged this on No Punishment without Crime or Bereavement without Death!.
LikeLike
I URGE EVERYONE TO TELL THEIR MP TO ATTEND AND CONTRIBUTE TO THIS! https://www.writetothem.com/
LikeLike
Why Family Law Needs Reform Now! By Suella Fernandes http://www.f4joz.com/news/newspage.php?yr=17&id=250
LikeLike
Reblogged this on | truthaholics.
LikeLike
Same sad story here.. good dedicated Dad GAGGED, NO CONTACT, HUMAN RIGHTS BREACHES, DOL’S and IMPRISONMENT LOOMS by the evil Family Court System.. It is just a massive “ABUSE OF POWERS”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Families Need Fathers – Bother Parents Matter, is a children’s rights organisation not a fathers rights organisation as you incorrectly describe us.
Ian Findlay
(TRUSTEE)
LikeLike
the problem with “children’s rights” is that they cant enforced unless the child wants them to be. thats what Social workers tell parents who have been cut off form contact.
its all about control and LAs are very good at it.
LikeLike
youtu.be/5VDs7ZLnUgw
Please watch this , the guy making the recording inside the family court exposes the corporate agenda behind stealing our children , this video was previously banned from you tiube , its what they don’t want people to see . please watch
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes ive seen this one. it was shared on here not so long ago.but thanks anyway.
LikeLike
Pingback: The Hidden Agenda Behind Westminster’s Debate On Family Justice Reform | HOLLIE GREIG JUSTICE
The role of Cafcass deciding on a child’s future with a five minute telephone interview with their mother and not speaking to the children needs to be seriously looked at.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Contents Of Fathers’ Rights Debate In Westminster Revealed | Researching Reform