Welcome to another week.
The nation’s Independent Inquiry Into Child Sexual Abuse is to hear a potentially game changing witness statement today.
David Hill, who was shipped to Australia from England by UK charity the Fairbridge Society during the 1950s as a child migrant, will tell the Inquiry about the terrible conditions at the child migrant farm he was sent to. Hill will also ask the charity to make a full apology, and will be calling on the British government to provide full compensation for the several hundred children who were abused at farms run by the society.
The charity, which is supported by British aristocracy and is alleged to have links to the royal family, has repeatedly refused to say sorry for what happened at their farms. A staggering 60% of the children sent to Fairbridge Molong were sexually abused.
The scale of abuse at these institutions was well known at the time. in February 2015, Lord Blackheath told the House of Lords that he and many others were involved in shipping children to places like Australia, in the full knowledge that they would be emotionally and physically abused by the religious orders and charities who were meant to be looking after them. Blackheath also confirmed that he knew the children were being illegally shipped over – they did not have the proper legal permissions to travel. Many were also abducted from their parents or forcibly removed without any kind of due process.
David Hill’s testimony adds to the growing number of voices calling on the government to be held accountable for its actions. In 2015, Researching Reform wrote to the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in Australia to share evidence of government failures which directly affected children who were abused in Australia. We also communicated with the nation’s Independent Inquiry Into Child Sexual Abuse inviting them to extend their scope to include children illegally transported to Australia, which they did in June of last year.
And in January of this year, former Prime Minister Gordon Brown went straight for the jugular, saying the government’s behaviour was tantamount to criminal negligence.
Hill’s evidence today could be the tipping point on this issue, opening up a floodgate of claims, and calls for the government to be put on trial for its actions.
Our question this week is a simple one: do you think the government should be tried for its part in the sexual abuse of children they sent to other parts of the world?
Ian Josephs said:
I think they would spend their time much better investigating abuse of children in care right now.They should ask why children in care are forbidden to report abuse during contact visits by parents.
They should ask why police refuse to even take statements from parents who report injuries or sexual abuse of their children in State care.
Typically they will concentrate on the past which cannot be changed and will ignore the present and the future for another 70 years……………
LikeLiked by 1 person
maureenjenner said:
Reblogged this on Musings of a Penpusher and commented:
The evil that is at the heart of children-in-care; past and present. It must be acknowledge, exposed, and stamped on and cut out – root and branch.
LikeLiked by 1 person
dr. manhattan62 said:
“Our question this week is a simple one: do you think the government should be tried for its part in the sexual abuse of children they sent to other parts of the world?”
i cant see how a Govt from the 1950s can be held accountable when most of the offenders will be dead by now.
the most sensible line of action would be to prosecute each individual who took part in the criminal actions and were happy to go along with it. these people should also be stripped of assets under the proceeds of crime act and the money paid into a central compensation fund for all those abused. the current Govt can then top up those payouts as appropriate.
LikeLike
daveyone1 said:
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike