• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Daily Archives: May 3, 2017

Local Authority Child Welfare Assessments At School May Not Be Legal

03 Wednesday May 2017

Posted by Natasha in child welfare, Researching Reform, social services

≈ 5 Comments

In March, Researching Reform made a Freedom Of Information request asking the government to outline the law or policy which allowed social workers to go into schools and interview children regarding child welfare concerns.

It took a little time to get a response, however the person at the Ministerial and Public Communications Division who provided the answer did apologise, and even took the time to highlight the relevant information, which comes from statutory guidance entitled Keeping Children Safe In Education.   This is the relevant part of the guidance which can be found at paragraph 59:

“Governing bodies and proprietors should ensure that the school or college
contributes to inter-agency working in line with statutory guidance
Working together to safeguard children. Schools and colleges should work
with social care, the police, health services and other services to
promote the welfare of children and protect them from harm. This includes
providing a coordinated offer of early help when additional needs of
children are identified and contributing to inter-agency plans to provide
additional support to children subject to child protection plans. All
schools and colleges should allow access for children’s social care from
the host local authority and, where appropriate, from a placing local
authority, for that authority to conduct, or to consider whether to
conduct, a section 17 or a section 47 assessment.” 

There are a few different points to make on this. The first is that the statement above comes from statutory guidance, which is not legally binding. So, whilst local authorities should follow the guidelines on offer, there is nothing which says they must follow them. By its nature statutory guidance is fluid, and whilst it urges government departments to abide by it, deviation from it is allowed – especially if there are competing interests at play.

This takes us to our second point. The very helpful FOI response also outlines another important fact. Ms or Mr J Radford tells us:

“KCSIE [Keeping Children Safe In Education] is clear that the best interests of the child must be at the heart of all safeguarding activities.”

In the wake of cases involving social workers arriving at schools to take children off the premises, and councils being rapped by Ofsted for seeing children during school hours, there is a growing need to look carefully at this guidance and at the very least revise it. Removing permission for social workers to interview children for the purposes of s.17 or s.47 assessments unless the child has specifically asked for the visit on school grounds, would be even better.

And so we now have competing child rights and human rights interests which affect this guidance.

Visits from social workers at school carry enormous stigma. Children already part of child protection proceedings are acutely aware that their childhood experience is different to their peers not undergoing the same investigations and it can be terribly embarrassing. Repeated school visits could even lead to emotional harm.

Ofsted’s gripe with the practice is that it also disrupts a child’s education, which is an important point.

This guidance then, sits at odds with the legal duty on government bodies to ensure that a child’s welfare remains paramount throughout child protection and child welfare proceedings. Given the spate of cases which have seen Ofsted pull up the policy on education grounds, and the Local Government Ombudsman criticise a council’s ‘ad lib’ deviation from the policy which was clearly not in the child in question’s best interests, there is also an argument that the guidance is leading to direct breaches of children’s right to education.

You can look at our request and read the reply, and attached documents here. 

SW school visits

 

 

 

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 7,426 other followers

Contact Researching Reform

Huff Post Contributer

For Litigants in Person

Child Welfare Debates

May 2017
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Apr   Jun »

Children In The Vine : Stories From The Family Justice System

Categories

  • Adoption
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and The Court of Protection
  • Articles
  • Big Data
  • Bills
  • Case Study
  • child abuse
  • child abuse inquiry
  • child welfare
  • Children
  • Children In The Vine
  • Circumcision
  • Civil Partnerships
  • Consultation
  • Conversations With…
  • Corporal Punishment
  • CSA
  • CSE
  • Data Pack
  • Domestic Violence
  • Encyclopaedia on Family and The Law
  • event
  • Family Law
  • Family Law Cases
  • FGM
  • FOI
  • forced adoption
  • Foster Care
  • Fudge of the Week
  • Fultemian Project
  • Huffington Post
  • Human Rights
  • IGM
  • Inquiry
  • Interesting Things
  • Interview
  • Judge of the Week
  • Judges
  • judicial bias
  • Law to lust for
  • legal aid
  • LexisNexis Family Law
  • LIP Service
  • LIPs
  • Marriage
  • McKenzie Friends
  • MGM
  • News
  • Notes
  • petition
  • Picture of the Month
  • Podcast
  • Question It
  • Random Review
  • Real Live Interviews
  • Research
  • Researching Reform
  • social services
  • social work
  • Spotlight
  • Stats
  • Terrorism
  • The Buzz
  • The Times
  • Troubled Families Programme
  • Twitter Conversations
  • Update
  • Voice of the Child
  • Voice of the Child Podcast
  • Westminster Debate
  • Who's Who Cabinet Ministers
  • Your Story

Recommended

  • Blawg Review
  • BlogCatalog
  • DaddyNatal
  • DadsHouse
  • Divorce Survivor
  • Enough Abuse UK
  • Family Law Week
  • Family Lore
  • Flawbord
  • GeekLawyer's Blog
  • Head of Legal
  • Just for Kids Law
  • Kensington Mums
  • Law Diva
  • Legal Aid Barristers
  • Lib Dem Lords
  • Lords of The Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • PAIN
  • Paul Bernal's Blog
  • Public Law Guide
  • Pupillage Blog
  • Real Lawyers Have Blogs
  • Story of Mum
  • Sue Atkins, BBC Parenting Coach
  • The Barrister Blog
  • The Magistrate's Blog
  • The Not So Big Society
  • Tracey McMahon
  • UK Freedom of Information Blog
  • WardBlawg

Archives

Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
    Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
    To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
    %d bloggers like this: