• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Daily Archives: February 28, 2017

Consultation For Vulnerable Witnesses Giving Evidence In Family Courts

28 Tuesday Feb 2017

Posted by Natasha in Researching Reform

≈ 2 Comments

The government has now published a consultation inviting everyone to share their views about how to best to support vulnerable witnesses giving evidence in court. 

The consultation refers to Draft Practice Direction 3AA, Vulnerable persons: participation in proceedings and giving evidence, which is intended to support a new Part 3A of the Family Procedure Rules.

The new Part 3A of the Family Procedure Rules place a duty on the court to consider:

a) whether a party’s participation in proceedings is likely to be diminished by reason of vulnerability and, if so, whether it is necessary to give “participation directions” for assistance; and

b) whether the quality of evidence given by a party or witness is likely to be diminished by reason of vulnerability and, if so, whether it is necessary to give participation directions. (This provision on giving evidence extends to children.)

The questions asked in the consultation are:

When read with draft Part 3A of the Family Procedure Rules:

1. Do you agree that draft PD3AA gives sufficient guidance on the duties of the court, parties and their representatives in relation to vulnerable witnesses? If you do not agree, please give reasons and explain what further guidance you think is needed.

2. Do you agree that draft PD3AA (particularly when combined with draft rule 3A.7) gives sufficient guidance on the term ‘vulnerability’, specifically in terms of how to identify if a party or witness is a vulnerable person? If you do not agree, please give reasons and explain what further guidance you think is needed.

3. Do you agree that draft PD3AA gives sufficient guidance on how the court should assist a vulnerable person to participate and give evidence effectively? If you do not agree, please give reasons and explain what further guidance you think is needed.

4. Do you agree that draft PD3AA is clear about the responsibilities of the parties and any legal representatives including when applying for directions and preparing for or conducting cross-examination? If you do not agree, please give reasons and explain what further guidance you think is needed.

5. Do you have any other comments on draft PD3AA?

All comments should be sent to:

Joanna Furlong, Family Justice Policy, Justice and Courts Policy Group, 3.40, Ministry of Justice, 102 Petty France, London SW1H 9AJ

or email:

 FPRCSecretariat@justice.gsi.gov.uk

The closing date for submissions is 5pm on Friday 17th March, 2017

consultation-vw

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 7,517 other followers

Contact Researching Reform

Huff Post Contributer

For Litigants in Person

Child Welfare Debates

February 2017
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728  
« Jan   Mar »

Children In The Vine : Stories From The Family Justice System

Categories

  • Adoption
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and The Court of Protection
  • Articles
  • Big Data
  • Bills
  • Case Study
  • child abuse
  • child abuse inquiry
  • child welfare
  • Children
  • Children In The Vine
  • Circumcision
  • Civil Partnerships
  • Consultation
  • Conversations With…
  • Corporal Punishment
  • CSA
  • CSE
  • Data Pack
  • Domestic Violence
  • Encyclopaedia on Family and The Law
  • event
  • Family Law
  • Family Law Cases
  • FGM
  • FOI
  • forced adoption
  • Foster Care
  • Fudge of the Week
  • Fultemian Project
  • Huffington Post
  • Human Rights
  • IGM
  • Inquiry
  • Interesting Things
  • Interview
  • Judge of the Week
  • Judges
  • judicial bias
  • Law to lust for
  • legal aid
  • LexisNexis Family Law
  • LIP Service
  • LIPs
  • Marriage
  • McKenzie Friends
  • MGM
  • News
  • Notes
  • petition
  • Picture of the Month
  • Podcast
  • Question It
  • Random Review
  • Real Live Interviews
  • Research
  • Researching Reform
  • social services
  • social work
  • Spotlight
  • Stats
  • Terrorism
  • The Buzz
  • The Times
  • Troubled Families Programme
  • Twitter Conversations
  • Update
  • Voice of the Child
  • Voice of the Child Podcast
  • Westminster Debate
  • Who's Who Cabinet Ministers
  • Your Story

Recommended

  • Blawg Review
  • BlogCatalog
  • DaddyNatal
  • DadsHouse
  • Divorce Survivor
  • Enough Abuse UK
  • Family Law Week
  • Family Lore
  • Flawbord
  • GeekLawyer's Blog
  • Head of Legal
  • Just for Kids Law
  • Kensington Mums
  • Law Diva
  • Legal Aid Barristers
  • Lib Dem Lords
  • Lords of The Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • PAIN
  • Paul Bernal's Blog
  • Public Law Guide
  • Pupillage Blog
  • Real Lawyers Have Blogs
  • Story of Mum
  • Sue Atkins, BBC Parenting Coach
  • The Barrister Blog
  • The Magistrate's Blog
  • The Not So Big Society
  • Tracey McMahon
  • UK Freedom of Information Blog
  • WardBlawg

Archives

Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
    Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
    To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
    <span>%d</span> bloggers like this: