Welcome to another week.
A woman who says she was repeatedly raped by paedophiles in Telford during her childhood, has told the national media that the attacks were so awful that she tried to commit suicide before leaving the town to escape her abusers.
During the course of the interview, the woman, who is now in her thirties, explains that she had several abortions after falling pregnant by the paedophiles who raped her. The number of abortions she had is not mentioned, or whether they were carried out by the NHS or a private clinic, though the article suggests that they were performed whilst the woman was still a minor.
We also do not know whether the place which carried out these abortions alerted social services or the police.
Today, NHS staff involved in the abortion process are obliged to contact social services if they suspect a child is at risk of sexual abuse. And in Wales, a new law implemented in April of this year now makes it compulsory for health care professionals to report suspicions of child sexual abuse.
Tensions between pro-life and pro-choice centres also exist, and have led to some pro-life organisations based in America covering up sexual abuse and closer to home in the UK, using scare tactics to deter women from having abortions.
Abortion clinics could be viewed as an incredibly important venue for identifying and preventing further abuse of children, though little mention of them is made in recent research on child sexual abuse in the UK. They are also places where reporting abuse can sometimes be overshadowed by moral or religious principles as with pro-life pregnancy centres, or a lack of understanding as to why children may become pregnant.
The nation’s Independent Inquiry Into Child Sexual Abuse has been tasked with looking at institutions which may have failed in their duty to protect children from exploitation.
Our question this week then, is just this: do you think the Inquiry should investigate abortion clinics, both NHS and private as part of its work?
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
I think obtaining information and records from abortion clinics would be very informative indeed (if indeed records were always kept) and this avenue should be pursued.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz Davies formulated an excellent critique and suggests that the CRIMINAL aspect of the inquiry should be strengthened in parallel to the INVESTIGATIVE / STATISTICAL fact-finding.
https://lizdavies.net/2016/08/11/goodbye-goddard-though-i-never-said-hello/
If only women and their wishes and feelings were heard at all stages of pregnancy!!!
LikeLike
The problem would be back street abortions will come to the fore if abortion clinics were to tell authorities of suspected abuse. Great idea but you have to bear in mind how abortion clinics came about.
LikeLike
Backstreet abortion clinics were made obsolete when the procedure was legalised, but there is always room for improvement in the way things are done. Above all, access to meticulously kept records is vital. Unfortunately, shady procedures do not encourage scrutiny and these are potential weaknesses so – yes to monitoring all such procedures. Those that have nothing to hide will not fear inspection and the more positive the outcome, the more confidence will be inspired among those who need help.
LikeLike
Thank you so much for your comments. This question focuses less on illegal or unregulated clinics, and more on the clinic as an important venue for detecting child sexual abuse, and breaches of any duties within this setting. The notion is that as a place, it may hold vital clues to abuse, the culture of abuse and the way institutions like clinics have responded to it in the past and indeed now.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Musings of a Penpusher and commented:
The more information made available the better. Those with nothing to hide have nothing to fear.
LikeLike