Welcome to another week.
In a recent article in The Times online, it has been suggested that the nation’s Independent Inquiry Into Child Sexual Abuse has gone beyond its intended role in creating its Truth Project, which The Times claims has turned the inquiry into a pseudo-judicial body, effectively trying facts as if it is a court of law. The article also goes on to say that the Inquiry is simply too big and too ambitious a project.
Setting aside the fact that The Times misunderstood the remit of the Truth Project completely (and had to print a correction as result), it is true that the Inquiry has grown in size since its creation. The Inquiry has had to extend its investigation out of necessity, due to the sheer number of allegations the police and other law enforcement organisations have received. It also has to contend with being the latest in a very long line of inquiries which have done little to improve safeguarding practices, so whatever they do now must be bold and progressive.
However, not everyone agrees that widening the net is the best way forward or that the Inquiry should engage in any form of fact finding. The cost of the Inquiry alone is set to reach into the millions and the likelihood of gathering evidence that in many cases will be several decades old seems small – much of this evidence is likely to be missing, destroyed or not archived in the first place. Critics of the Inquiry also doubt that the investigation can offer anything new to the large volume of research looking into state failings in the context of child sexual abuse.
Our question then, is just this: do you think the Inquiry is right to go all out, or should it pull back its investigation?
Researching Reform 
The British have not only abused Children in the UK but have abused children world wide just click onto the link to know truth http://worldsworstmassmurderer.blogspot.co.uk/
Then there are charities who use to sell the kids big time who are involved in this that or the other, well involved in every which way
We cannot help the past abused kids as there is to much money involved re the insurance and the big names being named we have already seen millions of pounds set aside for the abused victims only for people such as Lady Macur to say to 700 abused victims NO CASE and why is it costing millions of pounds for the meetings on child abuse when the so called prats in Government are on high wages then paid again like Lady Macur to say no case, it is time the LAMBS TO THE SLAUGHTER as the world knows the Brits to be, we need to start to protect the future generations We need to open the family courts and allow evidence to be produced judges to be investigated before they sit in judgment and sell the kids, in actuel fact the Lords and the Commons need closing down, but having said that most of the homeless in the city are from the care system so lets turn Parliament into a home for the homeless, yea if only. I hear from so many families who have the evidence of their kids being abused in care and have no doors to open and many families who do or have complained the contacts are stopped and the bloody judges sorry crooked judges do nothing but then if people check out the judges some have shares in the agencies, as I have always said the British children are a multibillion pound industry, and supposing we come out of the EU my god no kid has a chance in hell in this so called Great British Empire.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Musings of a Penpusher and commented:
There may be a question of ‘Can we afford it?’ which then beggar’s the question, ‘Can we afford NOT to have it?’
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why on earth should the Inquiry NOT go ‘all out’, Natasha???
How many children suffer every day anew and how many continue to suffer and how many don’t survive or can’t cope as survivors?
Come on! The further out the better, surely!!!
For example, the Inquiry might consider checking why the data of only 152 of 326 local authorities is being used on the official site, since the email addresses published either bounce or don’t answer.
LikeLike
Few questions:
What is the welfare of children worth?
What is too much cost and effort where the welfare of children is concerned?
How big it too big an inquiry where understanding past and present systemic failings is concerned?
Will understanding the failings of the past prevent harm of today’s and tomorrow’s children?
Oh and of course – do those who suggest the inquiry has too large a remit believe in justice? Or is justice something with a time limit?
LikeLike