Welcome to another week.
The government has just unveiled new plans to speed up adoption in a bid to channel more vulnerable children into permanent placements, rather than temporary foster homes with a view to returning them to their parents where possible.
The move is an attempt at placing more children with adoptive parents, within a quicker time frame.
Education Secretary, Nicky Morgan, described the new strategy as a “watershed moment” which would provide vulnerable children with the support and security they need. However social workers have expressed concern at the new policy, claiming it is a money saving scheme, and suggesting that the research used to push this new policy is questionable and does not provide evidence that the policy itself would even encourage more people to adopt.
Our question then, is just this: do you think the government’s latest policy on adoption is right?
You can read the new measures in full, here.
Forced adoption is in my opinion a crime against humanity and can never ever be right .Speeding it up to increase numbers will help to further enrich the adoption and fostering agencies already making millions of £s out of what has become an outrageous and pitiless racket.Parents who resist by “going public” will continue to be jailed………..
The UK is unique because it is the only country in the world where :-
1:- Babies are removed at birth for mere “risk of emotional abuse”
2:-Pregnant mothers leave their homes in a steady stream to give birth in foreign countries that do not take babies at birth for risks that may never happen.
3:-Family courts in nearly every town up and down the country are overloaded with cases where desperate parents beg in vain to keep their children from fostering or forced adoption.
And to think that the UK used to be the land of liberty and free speech ……………
LikeLike
One only has to know of the outrage of the British forced adoption so what does the British Governments do to cover their rears (In a child’s best interest)change the laws for foster carers who can now adopt or become the special guardian, what the Governments need to address urgently is the facts that many children can live with a family member but as we know families are just part of the multibillion pound children’s industry grandparents are assessed at a great cost by the court experts and most of us know that social services all work in a little ring of so called experts who know full well that no family members will have rights to a child they love, so why all of the assments, then we have grandparents spending thousands of pounds in the courts only to be told your grandchild does not want to see you again fill in this book of your life and let us know what you would like on your Epitaph read from the link. http://www.childrenscreamingtobeheard.com/dear-grandma/
Kids in care have begged some on hands and knees to live with their grandparents or stay with the parents but the children remain the silent witnesses, and in 2014 the governments said kids as young as 10 can speak in the court what a load of bull, Governments just say this that or other and the Nation thinks oh well change if only those laws were true so what are kids in care for apart from money and jobs, they are kids to be abused in every way and end up on the streets prisons detention centres or under the mental health act and guess what from the cradle to the grave kids in care are abused they have no doors to open and nor do the families.
Foster parents to be given new adoption rights | The Sunday …
http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/article1682334.ece
Marie Woolf and Sian Griffiths Published: 27 March 2016. Print. Foster parents, carers and potential adopters will have the same right as parents and relatives.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/111/made
LikeLike
No
LikeLike
Right??? It is OUTRAGEOUS that the government doesn’t even acknowledge or respond to what the MEPs found when they came for their fact finding visit: that an unusually high number of adoptions are taking place in the UK, compared with other countries…
And they didn’t even go into the statistical comparisons of ‘snatching’ or fostering.
But the battle of grandparents for our future generations continues in Brussels: on April 19th Ruby Harrold-Claesson will speak on behalf of Nordic countries to the Petitions Committee what I presented two years ago.
A Czech MEP has over 700 cases on file in Norway. The funding of contact centres is traced back to the City of London…
But the topic will be debated in the EU Parliament! Watch updates to our petition: https://www.change.org/p/eu-parliament-abolish-adoptions-without-parental-consent We changed the title from “Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent” due to the progress on the EU agenda.
LikeLike
Is it any wonder that Cameron and the rest want to come out of the EU then the British people will have no where to go for Justice as the world knows the British courts are so corrupt same for the children in care the only doors open for them is by the sex abuses and the paedophiles who open their little legs The UK is and has always been so evil the British governments can no longer sell the children to Canada Australia as in days gone by so what better then adoptions fostering and guardianships and I would bet via all of these new so called laws that many kids are sold to paedophiles in other parts of the world this along with kids names being changed. Thank god for people such as Sabine she is a strong lady and she will continue to speak out for the kids,
LikeLike
The proposals have worrying temporal dimensions; specifically, the time available for social work to ‘do’ social work (work that supports existing families) will be further constrained. We might ask whether the desire to speed up the process has more to do with a disregard for the meaning and value of social work in the first place. Social workers should be given more resources to do what they are supposed to be doing rather than be reduced to administrators of the adoption system.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This Policy is again based on “Family Destruction”. These are vulnerable HUMANS not animals or ornaments and they do have FEELINGS whilst, our inhumane Government has no Human instincts nor do they know the true meaning of EMPATHY.
LikeLike
Yes Destruction of the family unit – 100% like Hitler and SS did in Germany and Europe.
If you check the old texts in all religions you will find that humans are actually referred to as cattle.
Also in court your names in capitals means you are not humans but corporations – otherwise business cannot be done.
Its all explained as Auto Genocide with the cattle references etc from the top of the power pyramid.
http://www.whale.to/b/crow.html
“Politicians have to make difficult, executive decisions for their constituents, even if it seems unfair. That’s what they are elected for and they are giving the voters what they really want. If politicians refuse to make these decisions, they won’t get reelected. There are lots of people willing to run for office and make those executive decisions if the current politicians won’t do it. These choices are natural and a fact of life, Martha. I told you, every society does it.”
Surprised and confused, I replied, “Wait a minute, are you telling me that our society intentionally kills our own people, even women and children, only because the wealthy don’t want to share? That these deaths are intentionally planned?
Don’t the wealthy know that poverty is one of the ‘natural’ byproducts of capitalism, that capitalism depends on an official ‘average’ five percent unemployed to hold it up? Are you telling me that all politicians, local ones to national ones, not only know about this murder but willingly participate in it?”
“All of them know about it, Martha,” he told me. “Now you do, too. Don’t ever call me again and don’t ever quote me. I’ll deny I ever told you this.”
Common Purpose role was/is to destroy the family -it leads SS depts outside authority.- all groomed and brainwashed to do their job as family wreckers.
The pain and suffering from the true human beings is the source of energy for the inhuman among us.
LikeLike
They’re always going to ‘speed up adoption’ and it’s always a ‘watershed moment’ or a ‘tipping point’. If it happens, it will undoubtedly mean more cases of forced adoption which is against all humanity and common sense except in a small minority of cases. I think there’ll be a few more rumblings about this but in the end it will be quietly dropped like most ‘initiatives’ are about Family Law.
In passing, I would gently point out to Maggie that Cameron is campaigning to stay inside the EU, not leave it. And most countries in the EU do not practice forced adoption, or are working towards abandoning the practice. I still want to leave, though! Simply the fact that they haven’t had the accounts signed off for twenty-odd years is enough. Any business would have gone to the wall by now under those circumstances. And our Family Courts are indeed corrupt, but no more so than those in the rest of the EU I’ll wager.
LikeLike
thousands and thousands of children were sold to world countries or as governments and some charities will say sent abroad to live a better life in the days of the poor and work houses well the fostering adoptions and guardianships are just the same but its all now made legal to buy and sell kids by the agencies with the army of the SS, and under the children’s human rights it states no child should be sold for what ever, so much for children’s rights world wide. Look at the link as here http://ifsw.org/what-we-do/ is this why many parents cannot flee this evil so called Great British Empire
LikeLike
This Adoption policy is so wrong on so many levels.
The research into adoption outcomes for the children has been ignored. The child’s family, in many cases want the child but are veoted by social workers and they cannot have them. It is also worrying that adoption is often used to traffick children.
The government appears to wish to bury the child abuse scandals that have occurred in foster care by changing their policies to push for adoptions. The onus to protect the children taken by the family courts will then fall to the adopters not the government. This will also create a need for babies and under fives as they are the “chosen” ones. T
No doubt we will get to hear of the adoption atrocities in due course but the government won’t care as they will no longer be their responsibility.
The past PM Blair policies are just being regurgitated by the current PM Cameron, who hasn’t got an original thought in his head. If he had we would see better policies from this so called family man. The research clearly states kids are better off at home than in foster care so why hasn’t the government “reforms” put “care in the childs own home” as a priority and not adoption!
LikeLike
Common Psychological and Emotional Effects of Adoption
Some common issues observed in adoptees are:
Depression
Anxiety
Self-esteem issues
Reactive attachment disorder (RAD)
Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
Identity development
General feelings of grief, loss, and rejection
http://adoptionvoicesmagazine.com/my-second-mama/do-adoptees-have-more-problems/#.VvqyEHoYEdV
LikeLike
https://www.adoptionhealing.com/ginni.html
All adoptees have effects from their adoption experience. The degree of the effects and symptomatic behaviors vary a great deal.
There are vulnerabilities shared by all adoptees. In those most vulnerable, a distinct pattern of behaviors can be seen. Some have labeled this the “Adopted Child Syndrome.” (Kirschner)
Adopted ‘children’ are disproportionately represented with learning disabilities and organic brain syndrome. (Schecter and Genetic Behaviors)
Mental health professionals are surprised at the alarmingly high number of their patients who are adopted. Studies show an average of 25 to 35% of the young people in residential treatment centers are adoptees. This is 17 times the norm. (Lifton, BIRCO–Pannor and Lawrence)
Adoptees are more likely to have difficulties with drug and alcohol abuse, as well as, eating disorders, attention deficit disorder, infertility, suicide and untimely pregnancies. (Young, Bohman, Mitchell, Ostroff, Ansfield, Lifton and Schecter)
LikeLike
Lady P. The government doesn’t care! They need to offload the kids as quick as possible! Anyone will do! The production of a clean record and acting ability, to pull the wool over social workers eyes, will enable a prospective adopter/trafficker to have a child to use or abuse how they wish! Could even get paid! If their intention was altruistic at the beginning but the going get tough, it’s OK, the kid can be dropped back into the system, which often happens when they become teenagers and get stroppy when they lose their “cuteness”as the adoptive mother realises she only wanted a baby or small child to fullfill a need in her, not fulfill a need in the child!
LikeLike
https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/pastadoptionreport.pdf
Themes identified in the research literature
The available information highlights the following themes:
•
the wide range of people involved, and therefore
the wide-ranging impacts and “ripple effects” of
adoption beyond mothers and the children that were adopted;
•
the role not only of grief and loss, but the usef
ulness of understanding past adoption practices as
“trauma”, and seeing the impact through a “trauma lens”;
•
the ways in which past adoption practices dr
ew together society’s responses to illegitimacy,
infertility and impoverishment;
•
anecdotal evidence of the vari
ability in adoption practices;
•
the role of choice and coercion, secrecy and silen
ce, blame and responsibility, the views of broader
society, and the attitudes and specific behaviours of organisations and individuals;
•
the ongoing impacts of past adoption practices,
including the process of reunion between mothers
and their now adult children, and the degree
to which it is seen as a “success” or not; and
•
the need for information, counselling and support
for those affected by past adoption practices
LikeLike
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
http://www.adoptionlegalcentre.co.uk/2015/12/adoptive-parents-and -the-misuse-of-section-20/
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-08/inside-indian-adoptions:-children-caught-in-human-trafficking-we/6758798
Google CEOPs on “adoption & child trafficking”
Who knew that kids would be adopted just for the child benefits and housing benefits??? What shocking is that the government knows all this!
Adoption is becoming known as Child Laundering!
LikeLike
Adoption. How far will local authorities go?
http://www.ridleyandhall.net/adoption-how-far-will-local-authorities-go/
LikeLike
pensioners ruling westminster with loss of memory
http://www.childrenscreamingtobeheard.com/pensioners-ruling-westminster-lo...
10 Jul 2014 – Elizabeth Butler Sloss is just another person to head the organised child abuse ….
This I wrote in 2014 and since then what has changed we have had many more
pensioners in charge for the victims of child abuse lets look at Lady Macur she forgot that 700 victims were abused and dismissed the case she should have taken her LECITHIN for the memory lets hope that Mrs Goddard will do so, and in actual fact all bloody members of Parliament needs to renew their brain cells then maybe they will become normal and the victims will have justice and Britain can have freedom.
LikeLike
It is clear to me that many social workers are deliberately remiss in carrying out their duties in saving children they know are definitely at risk of harm by leaving them with abusive parents and guardians, giving them chance after chance, then when the child dies using it as an excuse to remove more children from families with whom it is claimed they are at risk of harm – emotional or otherwise – when they know this not to be so. Situations such as this have been going on for many years, being part of the EU hasn’t made any difference, not to this and not to a lot of others either, so I don’t think leaving would have any effect on this. My experiences with care proceedings (a long time ago) were a shock in that I discovered that social workers and other ‘professionals’ lie and twist the facts, inventing many false ones, to remove children from good parents who perhaps simply need help of some sort. The costs incurred are astronomical – a complete waste of government and local authority funds: ie taxes, which could be better spent on essential services for such as the elderly or handicapped that have been cut due to a supposed lack of funds. All these proceedings do is to keep affected children in the system, whether it be due to drug taking or committing crime later, keeping the courts etc busy, or needing the use of mental health services. The whole thing is a racket, designed to keep victims within the eye of the judicial and care systems. This keeps a lot people in guaranteed employment for a very long time at the expense of the lives and wellbeing of others. The children definitely don’t matter and are just seen as cash cows to these leeches.
LikeLike
I agree with what you have written but then it is also control of the population which goes back to the Eugenics
LikeLike