The latest news on child welfare:
- Priest attacks ‘shameful’ failure of abuse inquiry (Scotland)
- Smart Justice – Government Tries To Make Courts More Caring
- Blindspot: why social workers don’t always support contact between children and foster carers
In The News
12 Friday Feb 2016
Posted in Researching Reform
Researching Reform 
The contact for children in care and the social workers, I have now in the past years spoken and received emails from 100s of families and it is amazing to hear all families reporting that their contact was stopped and 9/10 say that the social workers have said that the child
BEFORE OR AFTER CONTACT WETS OR SOILS THEM SELVES AND THAT THE CHILD BECOMES DISRUPTIVE
OR WE HAVE
YOUR CHILD HAS SAID THEY NO LONGER WANT CONTACT
This is all hear say from a social worker
Then we go to the kids out of care and the lies they were told about contact and why they were in care it is time the families stopped communicating with social workers if the contact is stopped the families fill out the forms and go back to the court for contact, no families will ever get any where with a social worker who has already told them lies, and I will say again it is the families who ALLOW THE S/W to rule and say as they do, remember always go to the top other wise do as many families do and continue to write to the S/W and get no where, or as in the past couple of years families are told to fill in a book of your life give it to the SW and when your kids are out of care they will receive your life story when in fact a kid in care or out of care wants the love of the family they were taken from.
do not continue to give the social workers the power to rule it is the courts with the power for contact, if you have a problem with the council rubbish collection you don’t go to the dustman you go to the top of the council so it is up to the families to bring change not dustmen
LikeLike
Families of children taken against their wishes to be fostered, regard the day that children leave their foster families as the day they and their children are finally free from the system. Families do not want them to have any more contact with their former carers than absolutely necessary.
If foster carers want contact, let them have four sessions per year in supervised contact centres and see how they like it.
Children in care against their wishes are brainwashed into thinking that the Foster Carers are their family and that their birth family no longer want them or care for them
.
After time Stockholm Syndrome kicks in and the process is complete, until the day the money runs out and the fostered child is abandoned because his/her bedroom is needed for another (Paying) child, leaving the former fostered child scarred for life.
Foster carers in my opinion are part of the problem, if they are truly decent people fostering for the right reasons and not for the financial rewards or to have access to vulnerable children to abuse, let them just receive the same benefits that families would have received and let them donate the difference to local charities to help families in need.
Until they are prepared to do this, as far as I am concerned they are part of the problem and will always remain so.
LikeLike
They are indeed, part of the problem. If it’s primarily about the money, it’s not primarily about the kids. Simples. Same with the CSA extracting money from non-resident parents who can’t see their children, or have very limited ‘contact’. They don’t ask about emotional help, just the money. it’s all about the money. Not about the children.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on World Peace Forum.
LikeLike
We have heard a lot about the use of Special Guardianship Orders that were originally for kinship carers but seem to be highjacked by foster carers. A few years ago the financial support for SGO’s was not on a par with Fostering. It is now, so statically SGO’s will increase. Contact between the child and the Birth family is supposed to continue but contact is being stopped, often citing the “Children’s Voice”. ” I don’t want to see them” is the refrain social workers tell the family. Of course there is no way of proving if the child really did say anything of the kind. I suspect it’s because the carers don’t want the bother and are worried about the impact the family will have on the child. It might be the kids will want to live with their own family! Research states it ‘s the one thing the kids in care have in common, they want to go home!
LikeLike
The pattern is always the same.
Break up the natural family is the order of the day.
Hitler mustt be so proud that British etc copy his ideas.
However Hitler was in fact a puppet of the RC cult and the British.
History shows us how native families in USA, Australia, Ireland etc were split up, their languages removed, their clothes burned, their hair cut off etc and their elders- grandparents who carried the family wisdom all cut off from the children.
We still hear social workers use the language assimilating children into our culture – because it is somehow better.
We see now where the abused child is perfect material to make a profit fom while the loved child is useless.
“A rehabilitated child is a lost customer and lost profit. Whereas an abused child filled with resentment, who has seen no positive role models, only witnessing thuggery all around, is likely to remain on the criminal path, repeatedly returning to prison- this is where the profit lies! Surely someone could sort this out.
Panorama 2016 Teenage Prison Abuse Exposed, BBC1 & BBC2, 11 & 15 Jan and BBC iplayer.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06ymzly?utm_source=Howard+League+E-bulletin&utm_campaign=0f54871f43-E_bulletin1_15_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_a581d7b9f8-0f54871f43-75844605
Follow the money trail for the truth.
Then research the Roman Empire and the RC control over all children/slaves from birth/berth to grave and how much each live birth/berth is worth. That birth bond tells us clearly that once birth is registered and bond issued- the child is a slave of the system ruled from Roma- with its Red Mass each year and its judges etc in Vatican Red robes.
LikeLike
Just an observation………..
When a child goes into care social workers try to get the children to forget their families but when a child leaves care the child tries to forget they were ever in care.
Where does that leave the child?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another observation…..
Parental alienation is emotional child abuse and social services are called in but what is it called when social workers alienate children from their families by stopping contact?
Why is it they are never convicted?
news.stv.tv/east-central/315309/social-workers-conviction-for-stopping-family-contact-quashed/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reasons to stop a parent seeing their child.
http://www.familylawquestions.co.uk/page9/page12/page10/page27/
LikeLike
Many thanks to Maggie Tuttle Children screaming to be heard, for sending me further information on parental alienation.
This is the website of Karen Woodall.
https://karenwoodall.wordpress.com
Insight into why a child rejects a parent.
The same happens to children in care. Social workers should read this to understand how alienation happens and the damage done to the child when they promote no contact plans!
LikeLike
Social workers always use the excuse that “It will disturb the placement” Meaning that is nothing to do with “The best interests of the child” but all about making it easier for the foster carers and vicariously the system as a whole.
LikeLike
Mike, according to the website I put up earlier, family law questions, it seems that is a common reason. Is it really true? Doubtful. Research has said contact doesn’t disrupt the “placement”
A point should be made, that when children were allowed to see their families, they adapted well and benefitted from seeing their family.
One must question why social workers do not advocate contact in their plans for the children and often when they do, its scant, into twice a year! It is variable, some social workers advocate more, recognising the need.
In Private Law contact happens so much more than in Public Law. It would be incomprehensible to suggest that one party of a divorcing couple should only see their child only twice a year! It is only when a child is taken into care that the alienation of the family by social workers is de rigueur! The law via the Children’s Act says contact should be encouraged but social workers flout those laws! Best interests of the Child? No! How can it possibly be? Public Law is not supposed to be punitive but it clearly is! To both the children and parents and the extended family! Reading Karen Woodall shows what happens to the child!
LikeLike
Hi Dana, from their point of view, the less contact the child has with their family, the sooner Stockholm Syndrome will sink in and the child will begin to like his/her captors, making it easier for them to be controlled.
Parental alienation is very high on their agenda, they want children in care to forget their families because then when they become adults and have children of their own, these children then will be vulnerable and without family support, can easily be taken into the care system, thus perpetuating the money-go-round which is what the system is really all about.
Many social workers/foster carers, ex social workers and others involved in the system have interests in fostering/adoption agencies. These agencies are paid more than actual foster carers. It is a goldmine for them paid for by the misery children in care are subjected to.
LikeLike
Mike, I think you have something!
I see they have changed their name from social services, connotations with Hitler’s SS, to Children’s Services. Well another misnomer!
LikeLike
Smart justice, courts more caring! Can’t type for laughing!
LikeLike