These are the stories we feel should be right on the radar:
- Cyril Smith M1 child abuse probe closes over lack of evidence
- Unwanted racial references in child-abuse reporting
- Pilot service launched to aid victims of child abuse
In The News
30 Thursday Jul 2015
Posted in News
Researching Reform 
CYRIL SMITH â are we surprised? It is clear to see or strongly suspect once again those at the top are protected .Police officers at the time were silenced and this is the reason why Teresa MUST allow police officers to speak out freely and in a safe place about what they knew and when and who silenced them, without ramifications of the official secrets act. Not to do so will NOT bring transparency in the Child Abuse panel inquiry
LikeLike
Child abuse has been going on in the UK for 100s of years and yes with them who run the country who are in powers to protect the children, why are there 100s of charities to protect the kids and what do they do, YES GIVEN MILLIONS OF POUNDS a year to shut up and why are there so many Ministers along with the Lords all they do is sit and talk and talk with many involved in child abuse and at the end of the day for the poor victims it is always WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE AND YOU ARE OUT OF TIME, and oh yes them in power such as SMITH they are dead resigned or to ill, no wonder the uk is known as the centre of the EU for the paedophiles, and what of the courts so called experts boy what a corruption here all for money unless they are also into sexually abusing the kids in care as well, because I do not know of any court experts who send the kids back home, and do remember if there are only approx. 97.000 kids in care then how can the 100s of foster and adoption agents in this country make the millions of pounds what from a mere 97,000 kids, and why do so many social workers whilst still employed by the social services register their own companies, if bloody Parliament knew as much as I knew but then I suppose they do and does any one really think they would put a stop to the paedophiles and the sex abuse and the millions being made of course not as we can NOW read of SMITH another case closed, I often speak to a young man from the care one day he was dressed as a boy and abused and another day dressed as a girl and abused he tells me I don’t know if I am a boy or a girl and he has no evidence only what is in his mind and sufferings, and what of the little girl aged about 4/5 at 2 o’clock in the early mornings in the strand face full of make up one could see She was drugged up she was with an African lady I knew where she was going did the police, yes of course but did nothing and nether could I, so Mr Smith and the rest of you may you all rot in hell.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on tummum's Blog.
LikeLike
Marie Black was in my opinion shafted by her counsel when ordered (unlike the other defendants) not to give evidence herself preventing her from denying the allegations against her ,and her counsel decided also not to question any of the children making the allegations or the man who altered hundreds of court documents to ensure no leading questions were left in and that nothing that could reflect badly on the local authority remained.
Given these facts the jury really had to find her guilty even though the whole affair was in fact ss revenge on Marie because 3 years previously the press described how social workers illegally snatched her baby daughter in France and took her into State care in UK but were forced by a UK court to bring her back again to her mother,Marie in France !
LikeLike
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike