MPs met this afternoon to talk about their concerns and the latest developments in relation to the Independent Panel Inquiry, and below we have added a few of the key points that were raised:
Simon Danczuk (Labour MP for Rochdale) made the following statements:
- Just over 100 candidates are now being considered for the role of Chair for this inquiry
- There needs to be a central role for survivors
- At a recent meeting with the Home Secretary, there was a vote in favour of making the inquiry a statutory one under the 2005 Inquiries Act (this would essentially give the inquiry greater powers such as ensuring all evidence is given under oath and legal consequences could be implemented against individuals who destroy relevant evidence which would involve criminal sanctions). All those present voted unanymously in favour of making the inquiry a statutory one.
- There needed to be proper support in place for survivors
- Conditions need to be created to allow survivors to come forward
Tim Loughton (Conservative MP for East Worthing and Shoreham):
- A Chair needs to be appointed immediately, or dual Chairs if necessary
- The Inquiry should be led by a judge. UK judges have been approached but have all declined the position, seeing it as a poisoned chalice. It may be necessary to look abroad for a judge who can fit the position and who will take it on.
- Survivors should sit on the panel
- Make the inquiry a statutory one
- Create a sounding board panel of survivors who are consulted not just at the beginning of the inquiry but throughout
Zac Goldsmith (Conservative MP for Richmond Park):
- There needs to be an assurance by the Home Office that all Ministries and Government agencies will not to destroy any documents that are even remotely connected to child sex abuse.
John Hemming (Lib Dem MP for Birmingham, Yardley):
- Approached Michael Mansfield personally, who agreed to chair the panel, but has not yet managed to persuade the Home Secretary to appoint him.
- One in seven children in care are being subjected to abuse
- It needs to be harder for state employees to conceal abuses of power. More transparency and accountability are needed, as well as less secrecy.
Other notable comments included the confirmation by the The Home Secretary that the chair can decide whether to make the inquiry statutory, and that whilst a Chair has not yet been appointed and a date for that appointment not yet known, the process is underway.
An update on the panel’s activities was also given, although there was some concern amongst the speakers at the meeting that much of what was taking place might not be considered official without a Chair at the helm. Nevertheless, the panel is currently working, and has done or is doing the following:
- It is meeting weekly in the run-up to Christmas.
- Panel members have already attended two listening meetings with victims and survivors.
- Two further regional meetings will be held before Christmas, and four regional meetings will be held in the new year.
- The meetings will provide an early opportunity for survivors to give their views, and they will help to inform the panel on how to go about its work.
We’ll bring you more news as we get it, though as you can see, the inquiry is clearly not going to go full steam ahead for a while yet. You can read the full transcript from the meeting here.
Jessica A Bruno (waybeyondfedup) said:
Reblogged this on Jessica A Bruno (waybeyondfedup).
LikeLike
Nichiren said:
Great progress and good to see some brave MPs – suggest getting former Director of Public Prosecution Sir Keir Starmer to chair as he lead to very substantial improvements to police procedures regarding ‘victim credibility’ – this has to be extended to all professions including the Judiciary, Psychiatry, Psychology and Social Work.
LikeLike
Tom Dobbie said:
I nominate myself as chair.
A consultant physicist with global business experience over many years.
Direct experience of the tricks, criminality, perjury, negligence, smearing, covering of evidence by institutions appointed to protect children over 6 intensive years.
Access to hundreds of people who have been abused by these institutions,.
Used to running teams.
Used to writing policy.
Lots of energy to solve this truthfully and effectively.
LikeLike
Maggie Tuttle said:
All children abused in care past and present should now be represented in the latest talks by their own legal teams to include the good honest Barristers and lawyers it is via the help line for the children screaming to be heard we hear of truth and the most wanted man in the legal field by families who have had their children taken on allegations only is Michael Bailey Barrister from Tanfield chambers and I would agree Mr Bailey would be the prefect Barrister along with others to include Natasha of his choice to represent the abused kids and to make sure they all have a fair hearing and I know Mr Bailey is working flat out with Claire Roberts a lawyer to help many families for no gain. Many social workers and cafcass well the whole army “IN A CHILD’S BEST INTEREST” SAY all kids in care tell lies and none know what they want, If i had one wish today i would want to address the NEW ARMY OF THE UK the S/S and the rest of the army and to tell them truth from the Nation and from a ground level, or better still it is people such as I can sit in meetings as I have done in years gone by and debate with them that are suppose to know having only learnt from the old boys net work. If they only they knew the truth I wonder would any of them shed a tear, NO and for this reason children are screaming to be heard.
http://www.childrenscreamingtobeheard.com the silent witnesses here lies the truth.
LikeLike
Dana said:
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/westminster-sex-abuse-scandal-ex-cabinet-minister-was-photographed-in-the-sauna-with-a-naked-boy-at-elm-guest-house/ar-BBg5qR2?ocid=U219DHP
I think its fair to say the general public have little confidence that an unbiased inquiry will take place after the previous attempts of nepotism!
LikeLike
Natasha said:
Yes, and I’d like to see the list of 100 candidates being considered too.
LikeLike
daveyone1 said:
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
Dana said:
Hi Natasha, So would I! I would be happy to see the names of the MPs who continued to push for inquiries into abuses or would that be considered to be too biased? It’s good to know not all are morally corrupt! It’s in their interests to know who abused kids in Westminster, I’m sure they don’t want to be tarred with the same brush as those who abused!
LikeLike
Dana said:
One child in seven subjected to abuse in care!!!!!!!!
What exactly are the government doing about it?
Ofsted check on care homes but what independent checks are done on foster carers?
Judges state they are taking a child into care to safeguard them but it’s clear that just being in care does not guarantee that!
LikeLike
Pingback: HISTORIC #ChildSexualAbuse #CSA debated in House of Commons on 27 November 2014 | National Inquiry into Organised, Orchestrated & Historic Child Sexual Abuse
Maggie Tuttle said:
MPs cannot speak out against each other because it would be going against the old boys network , the old saying is, it is not what you know but who, so what do MPs and the rest of the old boys network know, how to make money by debating debating and dabating and let the Nation think they are all debating on behalf of the children being abused or what ever other problems affecting the Nation, and what of Sir James Munby when one knows how governments love to play hide and seek then just maybe Sir Munby was put in place for a year so the Nation will believe governments are not just debating and debating they say look we have Sir Munby bringing change, so what has changed for the kids in care
since Sir Munby became a voice for change.
NOT A LOT AND NOT A LOT WILL CHANGE
REMEMBER KIDS ARE A MULTIBILLION POUND INDUSTRY WITH SO MANY JUDGES HOLDING SHARES IN THE FOSTERING AND ADOPTION AGENCIES HOW MANY MPs HAVE SHARES “All in a child’s best interest”
http://www.childrenscreamingtobeheard.com the silent witnesses here lies the truth.
LikeLike
crossofchangeorg said:
Reblogged this on Sheva's Cross of Change Blog.
LikeLike
Pingback: Child Abuse Inquiry -Today’s Meeting Between The Panel and Survivors | Researching Reform
katesjc6189 said:
Reblogged this on Supporting UK Justice: For the Defence! by a layman.
LikeLike