We’ve got more news stories today, which we think are worthy of sharing:
The Buzz
21 Friday Feb 2014
Posted News, Researching Reform, The Buzz
in21 Friday Feb 2014
Posted News, Researching Reform, The Buzz
inWe’ve got more news stories today, which we think are worthy of sharing:
daveyone1 said:
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLike
Dana said:
Adoption forced adoption laws!!
LikeLike
Dana said:
Whistleblowers call time on corrupt Child Support Agency
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2565352/Apologists-paedophilia-As-Mail-exposes-links-senior-Labour-figures-vile-paedophile-group-one-man-abused-child-asks-wont-admit-wrong.html
Lawyer wants apology!
LikeLike
Dana said:
http://blogs.abc.net.au/queensland/2013/03/forced-adoption-apology.html?cid=6a00e0097e4e688833017ee989f88b970d
Radio link from Australia. The situation has not changed in the UK!!
LikeLike
Dana said:
LikeLike
Dana said:
http://www.herefordtimes.com/news/11020878.Long_serving_social_worker_struck_off/
LikeLike
Dana said:
http://www.charismanews.com/world/42866-will-london-follow-belgium-into-euthanasia
Last year in Scotland, Margo Macdonald introduced a bill to legalize assisted suicide, and in Westminster, Lord Falconer is also pushing for a change in the law.
http://rt.com/shows/sophieco/belgium-senator-euthanasia-advocate-959/
http://rt.com/politics/child-euthanasia-ruaaisn-adoption-352/
Lower House MPs have asked the Foreign Ministry to study the recently passed law allowing child euthanasia in Belgium in order to decide if its citizens should be legally banned from adopting Russian kids
LikeLike
Dana said:
http://rt.com/usa/nsa-employee-son-death-817/
http://rt.com/news/human-trafficking-slavery-crime-746/
http://rt.com/news/child-uk-trafficking-slavery-589/
http://rt.com/news/human-trafficking-slavery-shocking-050/
Meanwhile, British girls trafficked for sexual exploitation in 2011 made up nearly one half of all UK slavery victims, according to the study. One incident reportedly involved a girl who was raped by 90 men in the course of one weekend.
“We have allowed human beings in the UK to be bought and sold as mere commodities for profit, gain or gratification. How on earth have we arrived at a place where there is no ambition or leadership to stamp out this appalling crime?” CEO of anti-human-trafficking charity Unseen, Andrew Wallis, who also worked on the report, said.
More reasons why there should not be forced adoptions! Since the authorities have no idea where these children end up, how can they possibly say there are safeguarding them! The very reason they were taken from their families!
But they shouldn’t be taking them in the first place and they can’t keep them safe once taken into care! Abuses are so much worse than if they had left them alone!
http://rt.com/news/children-care-homes-uk-226/
NCCPR long has argued that many children now trapped in foster care would be far better off if they had remained with their own families and those families had been given the right kinds of help.
Turns out that’s not quite right.
In fact, many children now trapped in foster care would be far better off if they remained with their own families even if those families got only the typical help (which tends to be little help, wrong help, or no help) commonly offered by child welfare agencies.
That’s the message from the largest studies ever undertaken to compare the impact on children of foster care versus keeping comparably maltreated children with their own families.
So if Edward Timpson wants the BEST for the CHILDREN then he should take a look at the LARGEST EVER STUDY ever done involving 38,000 CHILDREN and begin to implement it!
LikeLike
Dana said:
http://www.charismanews.com/world/42889-invading-parental-rights-scotland-moves-to-assign-social-worker-to-every-child
Invading Parental Rights, Scotland Moves to Assign Social Worker to Every Child
Almost 8,000 children have been singled out for “targeted intervention” as part of a pilot for the Scottish National Party’s (SNP) controversial state guardian proposals, a Scottish newspaper has revealed.
The plans to assign every youngster a state-employed named person—whom a top lawyer says could “cut across” the rights of parents—are being voted on for the final time later today in Holyrood.
The scheme has been trialed in the Highlands since 2010, and a council spokeswoman says 7,927 children have been given a “child’s plan” by a head teacher or health visitor.
Before the trial began, there were just 64 children on the child protection at-risk register in the whole Highland council area.
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch, says the figures from the Highlands suggest that “thousands of families are having their privacy interfered with on a daily basis.”
He says this “staggering” number should force the SNP to “abandon this increasingly authoritarian policy.”
The Christian Institute is campaigning against the SNP’s plans, which come under the Children and Young People (Scotland) Bill.
The charity has written to senior law officers in Edinburgh and London, urging them to refer the matter to the U.K. Supreme Court to decide whether it is legal for the Scottish Parliament to enact this bill.
Colin Hart, director of The Christian Institute, says, “Senior politicians and the law officers have the powers to act as and when required. It is clear that this bill breaches European rules through its attack on the family.
“It is nothing less than a state-sponsored, fundamental attack on ordinary parents and their rights to raise their children.”
The Christian Institute received a legal opinion from leading human rights lawyer Aidan O’Neill, which said the scheme would have powers that “cut across” the rights of their parents.
O’Neill warned that the plans may not be compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, which says the state should respect “private and family life.”
Tory member of the Scottish Parliament Liz Smith opposes the state guardian proposals and will attempt to introduce an opt-out clause for parents who do not want their child to have a named person when the bill is debated and voted on in Holyrood later today.
Writing in the Scottish Daily Mail, she said the plan “threatens to take much-needed resources away from our most vulnerable children.”
The Church of Scotland has also warned that the named-person scheme “diminishes the role of parents,” while the Evangelical Alliance in Scotland says the plans raise “serious concerns about the role of the state in modern Scotland.”
But the heads of 13 children’s charities have told ministers they “strongly support” the principle, saying it puts into legislation the practice of a “more joined-up approach” that is already being rolled out across Scotland.
LikeLike
Dana Raymond said:
The Telegraph gives an account of a woman who had her children taken by social services.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/8349748/Social-services-took-my-children.html
LikeLike
Dana said:
http://www.thestarphoenix.com/life/topic.html?t=SEO+Title&q=Foster+child+dies+after+concerns
Death of a child in foster care.
LikeLike
Dana said:
http://www.fostercareuk.co.uk/statistics
What is not shown is:
How many children make abuse allegations against foster carers?
How many foster carers are found to abuse children?
How many deaths occur in foster care?
How many children go missing and are not reported as such?
How many children self harm as a result of being in care?
How many children commit suicide in foster care?
How many foster children want to go home?
LikeLike
Dana said:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10668702/Egg-on-judges-face-as-sons-return-home.html
Judge’s orders force 2 children away from mum on Christmas Day to a father who walked out on them 11 years ago but they are now back home! The kids voted with their feet! 2 social workers agreed they should be back home which although it was the right decision, it also proves the power of social workers! The Judge will rubberstamp their decision, what else can she do?
LikeLike