• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • Guide To Making A Subject Access Request
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Daily Archives: October 26, 2013

Judge of the Week: Sir James Munby

26 Saturday Oct 2013

Posted by Natasha in Judge of the Week

≈ 21 Comments

Here at Researching Reform, we make no secret of the fact that we have double standards – when it comes to the relative responsibilities of professionals versus parents inside the family justice system. Professionals have a duty to carry out their work with competence, and parents and children going through the system rely on their expertise to navigate the process. That is why Sir James Munby’s latest statement on shoddy social work makes him our hero this week.

In a recent case, which Sir Munby, the President of the Family Division, presided, two social workers from Bristol failed to tell parents whose children were being adopted , why their children were being taken from them, despite a court order specifying this needed to be done (and what an indictment on the system that we even need such a court order in instances like these). 

To make matters worse, the parents did not find out the reasons for the removal of their children until 45 minutes before the adoption order, we presume, was due to be finalised, giving the parents no chance at all of mounting a challenge. For those of us who work inside the system on a daily basis, this scenario will not seem unusual – we cannot count the myriad times this sort of thing has happened to parents and children we assist as they go through the process. And it’s all part of the game that’s played in court – merely viewed as “strategy” most of the time, the culture inside the system has become so sick, that our very own President had to issue a court order, clearly, to enforce the correct procedures for the adoption process – social workers are required to tell parents why their children are being removed from them, in a timely fashion.

Sir Munby goes on to criticise the Bristol social workers in a searing attack, referring to their actions as, ‘deplorable’ and ‘symptomatic of a deeply rooted culture in family courts’. 

The President then went on to say that such action in future could lead to consequences for social workers, which has been interpreted by some to mean the possibility of imprisonment. 

For his continuous courage as he faces an uphill struggle to battle the inadequacies of the system, for his insight and understanding, and his willingness to understand the impact that poor practice has on families and parents, and for being resolute in eradicating incompetence and lethargy inside the family justice system,we make Sir James Munby, our Judge of the Week.

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,452 other subscribers

Contact Researching Reform

Huff Post Contributer

For Litigants in Person

Child Welfare Debates

October 2013
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Sep   Nov »

Children In The Vine : Stories From The Family Justice System

Categories

  • Adoption
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and The Court of Protection
  • Articles
  • Big Data
  • Bills
  • Case Study
  • child abuse
  • child abuse inquiry
  • child welfare
  • Children
  • Children In The Vine
  • Circumcision
  • Civil Partnerships
  • Consultation
  • Conversations With…
  • Corporal Punishment
  • CSA
  • CSE
  • Data Pack
  • Domestic Violence
  • Encyclopaedia on Family and The Law
  • event
  • Family Law
  • Family Law Cases
  • FGM
  • FOI
  • forced adoption
  • Foster Care
  • Fudge of the Week
  • Fultemian Project
  • Huffington Post
  • Human Rights
  • IGM
  • Inquiry
  • Interesting Things
  • Interview
  • Judge of the Week
  • Judges
  • judicial bias
  • Law to lust for
  • legal aid
  • LexisNexis Family Law
  • LIP Service
  • LIPs
  • Marriage
  • McKenzie Friends
  • MGM
  • News
  • Notes
  • petition
  • Picture of the Month
  • Podcast
  • Question It
  • Random Review
  • Real Live Interviews
  • Research
  • Researching Reform
  • social services
  • social work
  • Spotlight
  • Stats
  • Terrorism
  • The Buzz
  • The Times
  • Troubled Families Programme
  • Twitter Conversations
  • Update
  • Voice of the Child
  • Voice of the Child Podcast
  • Westminster Debate
  • Who's Who Cabinet Ministers
  • Your Story

Recommended

  • Blawg Review
  • BlogCatalog
  • DaddyNatal
  • DadsHouse
  • Divorce Survivor
  • Enough Abuse UK
  • Family Law Week
  • Family Lore
  • Flawbord
  • GeekLawyer's Blog
  • Head of Legal
  • Just for Kids Law
  • Kensington Mums
  • Law Diva
  • Legal Aid Barristers
  • Lib Dem Lords
  • Lords of The Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • PAIN
  • Paul Bernal's Blog
  • Public Law Guide
  • Pupillage Blog
  • Real Lawyers Have Blogs
  • Story of Mum
  • Sue Atkins, BBC Parenting Coach
  • The Barrister Blog
  • The Magistrate's Blog
  • The Not So Big Society
  • Tracey McMahon
  • UK Freedom of Information Blog
  • WardBlawg

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 813 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: