• About
    • Privacy Policy
  • GSW
  • Guide To Making A Subject Access Request
  • In Dad’s Shoes
    • An Overview
    • Invitation
    • Media
    • Photos
    • Press Release
    • Soft Launch
    • Speeches
    • Summary
  • Media Coverage
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Voice of the Child Podcasts

Researching Reform

Researching Reform

Daily Archives: September 24, 2013

Matrimonial Survey 2012

24 Tuesday Sep 2013

Posted by Natasha in Family Law

≈ 2 Comments

We came across this interesting report by Grant Thornton, which appears to have been published on 13th September of this year, and which focuses on the actual and perceived impact of the Family Procedure Rules 2010, co-habiting couples and case-law, and the impact of alternative dispute resolution on separating couples. The report helpfully compares the data from their 2011 survey.

There are some statistics of note:

  • Much like our US counterparts, the main reason cited in divorce proceedings was falling out of love, with extra marital affairs a close second
  • Most marriages last between 11 and 20 years
  • Most lawyers questioned in the survey wanted to see increased protection for cohabiting couples, closely followed by the introduction of no fault divorce
  • 42% of those asked felt that co-habiting couples should not get the same rights as married couples (and a further 15% said No, subject to certain conditions)
  • The use of collaborative law is on the rise

It’s worth a quick gander.

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Foster Carers as Kin Paid Less than Non Relatives – Court Rules Unlawful

24 Tuesday Sep 2013

Posted by Natasha in Children, Family Law

≈ 2 Comments

In what appears to be an as yet un-published judgment (which we hope will be published in due course, but if we have made a mistake, please do tell us), the Court of Appeal have upheld a foster carer’s case against a local authority which refused to pay her the same amount as a non-relative would be paid, to care for her nephews and her niece.

The claimant foster carer applied for judicial review of the local authority’s payment policies and was granted the review, with the judge agreeing that the policies were unlawful. 

The Court of Appeal held that the local authority’s policies and subsequent actions were unlawful based on the fact of discrimination as between related and non-related carers.

The local authority’s appeal was therefore dismissed.

We have not researched this area, but we were fascinated by this case and wondered how many LA’s out there are discriminating in this way. Is it a large-scale nationwide phenomenon, or an isolated incident? Given that Tower Hamlets is a large borough, we have a feeling others may be doing the same.

What this case does illustrate however, is just how malevolent fostering policy can become. The discrepancy in pay looks to us at least, to be playing on the sentiment that foster carers who are related to the children they care for are less likely to object to being paid lesser sums because of the emotional pull in the situation; an already existing attachment and, arguably, a sense of duty. An economic calculation by government, no doubt, but one with a chilling consequence for children in care. In this case at least, the policy appears to be geared towards the notion that payment is assessed by looking at different classes of carers. And here we must be careful, because we are not even talking about distinctions based on ability or qualifications; if we were, one could argue that those carers who are related to the children being cared for should be paid more – precisely because they are more likely to understand these children better and could potentially offer more tailored support for those children.

But shouldn’t payment be assessed on the individual needs of each child, rather than a terribly apartheid-like class system of carers, if we must focus on money in foster care, which in the real world undoubtedly we must, as children require caring in a material sense, too? This of course, does already happen in practice, but a more efficient system would require a much more sophisticated assessment process, and one which could go horribly wrong, in the wrong hands. Still, we need to shift the focus away from offensive divisions like the one this case highlights.

(Notification of this decision was published in the brilliant Appeal Tracker service by LexisPSL).

Share this:

  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,468 other subscribers

Contact Researching Reform

Huff Post Contributer

For Litigants in Person

Child Welfare Debates

September 2013
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« Aug   Oct »

Children In The Vine : Stories From The Family Justice System

Categories

  • Adoption
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and The Court of Protection
  • Articles
  • Big Data
  • Bills
  • Case Study
  • child abuse
  • child abuse inquiry
  • child welfare
  • Children
  • Children In The Vine
  • Circumcision
  • Civil Partnerships
  • Consultation
  • Conversations With…
  • Corporal Punishment
  • CSA
  • CSE
  • Data Pack
  • Domestic Violence
  • Encyclopaedia on Family and The Law
  • event
  • Family Law
  • Family Law Cases
  • FGM
  • FOI
  • forced adoption
  • Foster Care
  • Fudge of the Week
  • Fultemian Project
  • Huffington Post
  • Human Rights
  • IGM
  • Inquiry
  • Interesting Things
  • Interview
  • Judge of the Week
  • Judges
  • judicial bias
  • Law to lust for
  • legal aid
  • LexisNexis Family Law
  • LIP Service
  • LIPs
  • Marriage
  • McKenzie Friends
  • MGM
  • News
  • Notes
  • petition
  • Picture of the Month
  • Podcast
  • Question It
  • Random Review
  • Real Live Interviews
  • Research
  • Researching Reform
  • social services
  • social work
  • Spotlight
  • Stats
  • Terrorism
  • The Buzz
  • The Times
  • Troubled Families Programme
  • Twitter Conversations
  • Update
  • Voice of the Child
  • Voice of the Child Podcast
  • Westminster Debate
  • Who's Who Cabinet Ministers
  • Your Story

Recommended

  • Blawg Review
  • BlogCatalog
  • DaddyNatal
  • DadsHouse
  • Divorce Survivor
  • Enough Abuse UK
  • Family Law Week
  • Family Lore
  • Flawbord
  • GeekLawyer's Blog
  • Head of Legal
  • Just for Kids Law
  • Kensington Mums
  • Law Diva
  • Legal Aid Barristers
  • Lib Dem Lords
  • Lords of The Blog
  • Overlawyered
  • PAIN
  • Paul Bernal's Blog
  • Public Law Guide
  • Pupillage Blog
  • Real Lawyers Have Blogs
  • Story of Mum
  • Sue Atkins, BBC Parenting Coach
  • The Barrister Blog
  • The Magistrate's Blog
  • The Not So Big Society
  • Tracey McMahon
  • UK Freedom of Information Blog
  • WardBlawg

Archives

  • Follow Following
    • Researching Reform
    • Join 813 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Researching Reform
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: