More thought-provoking family-related content is making its rounds around the internet this week, so we add some links to what we felt were interesting:
- An Apology for Forced Adoption: The NSW Parliament in Australia issues a formal apology to families whose children were forcibly removed from their care during a period of time when forced adoption laws were used to remove children from, for example, single pregnant women. It raises interesting philosophical questions for the general practice of forced adoption, today. Well worth a watch. (Thank you to Phil for sharing this video with us).
- Neon Roberts to Receive Radiotherapy Against Mother’s Wishes: This seven-year old boy is now in the full spotlight of the media glare, as his case made its way up to the High Court. The reason? Neon Roberts is suffering from a brain tumour, but his mother was concerned that radiotherapy would do him more harm than good and wanted to look to alternative therapies to help cure him. Neon’s father disagreed and so, the discussion found its way inside the court system. Now, the High Court have ruled that Neon should go ahead and have radiotherapy, in the hope that it will save his life. A fascinating case, not just for the way in which the mother’s reasoning is viewed by the presiding judge as irrational and negatively affected by emotion, but also because there seems to be a complete absence of coverage on how the little guy felt about all of this. Did Neon agree with his mother? Did he disagree? The voice of the child may not always be the only voice, but surely, it must play its part.
And finally…. The cultural phenomenon that became an international debate: School shootings and gun regulation in America.
- After the last school shooting in America, the Vice President of the National Rifle Association gives a speech on why every school should have armed police officers guarding (for our take on the speech, have a look here).

“A fascinating case, not just for the way in which the mother’s reasoning is viewed by the presiding judge as irrational and negatively affected by emotion, but also because there seems to be a complete absence of coverage on how the little guy felt about all of this.”
No surprise Natasha- the pattern is always the same .
The old patriarchal thinking is all mothers are feeble minded and therefore unable to make decisions re their own creations -children.
Ask any honest judge and he will tell you the grooming process on this.
Another mother in same situation was/is deemed a Munch Mum for giving her son brain cancer- that’s the system. Son was cut off from her for years. No contact at all.
Mothers are not supposed to be e-motional in situations like this, but if they show no e-motion- energy in motion- then they are labelled cold and also abusers.
Its catch 22.
As for the child- of course his voice is not heard- he is a chattel of the male and what fathers say goes.The little guy is not deemed a full human being.
Many judges are also groomed to believe that because father expresses interest in the child that he cares- not always the case.
It’s a shame that any deviation from what is viewed as conventionally rational is treated quite so dismissively. I would not have had the courage to look to alternative medicine if it had been my child in need, and I daresay I would have chosen radiotherapy, but that doesn’t make the mother’s view any less legitimate, even given the circumstances as they stood at the time.
It would have been interesting to know what Neon himself thought, too.
Yes, I have said it before that in the future Britain will apologize AGAIN for the social experiment that is adoption.
Natural mothers , fathers and children suffer.
All the research is there re Dark side of adoption and the % of adoptees who become criminals and murderers.
The trauma of ripping the baby from the mother causes so much damage and the system in UK knows it.
Many adoptees commit suicide, and natural mothers commit suicide too.
Still the cover ups go on. Still the Trojan Horse method is used and these children will have no way of ever finding their creators/mothers in the future.
No one will investigate of course. The cover ups re forced adoption in 2012 goes on.
No one investigates which mothers are targeted for adoption 2012-